Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Mozilla Faces Financial Uncertainty After Google Loses Lawsuit
The Google Search Engine Cash Cow may be about to dry up for Firefox.
August 12, 2024
post photo preview

It's no secret that Mozilla has been -- for several years -- almost entirely reliant on funding from Google in order to bankroll the continued development of Firefox.  In fact, over 80% of Mozilla's revenue comes directly from a deal where Google is made the default search engine within Firefox.

Now, a legal ruling against Google -- declaring the company to be an illegal monopoly in the Search Engine market -- could cause all of that funding to dry up.

Possibly putting Mozilla out of business in the process.

The Google Antitrust Lawsuit

On October 20th, 2020, The U.S.A.'s Department of Justice (along with 11 States) filed suit against Google -- specifically alleging that Google held a monopoly on the Search Engine market, and had engaged in anticompetitive practices.

On August 5th, 2024, US District Judge Amit Mehta ruled against Google.

"After having carefully considered and weighed the witness testimony and evidence, the court reaches the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly. It has violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act.

 

Specifically, the court holds that (1) there are relevant product markets for general search services and general search text ads; (2) Google has monopoly power in those markets; (3) Google’s distribution agreements are exclusive and have anticompetitive effects; and (4) Google has not offered valid procompetitive justifications for those agreements. Importantly, the court also finds that Google has exercised its monopoly power by charging supracompetitive prices for general search text ads. That conduct has allowed Google to earn monopoly profits."

What, exactly, does all of this mean?

It means -- in part -- that Google may be forced to significantly change how it operates its search business -- including paying companies like Mozilla and Apple for default or prominent Search Engine placement.

How this impacts Mozilla & Firefox

Some of the details documented in the lawsuit -- including in the deposition with Mozilla's ex-CEO, Mitchell Baker -- are fascinating.

From the August 5th ruling:

"Google also has a revenue sharing agreement with the browser developer Mozilla, whereby it pays Mozilla % revenue share in exchange for the default search placement on the Firefox browser.

 

The search access points on Firefox include “the search box” in the browser, “the navigation or location bar,” any “search box displayed on a Firefox Startpage,” among others.

 

If Mozilla implements the “this time, search with” feature on its mobile application, the revenue share paid under the Google-Mozilla agreement drops from %[REDACTED] to %[REDACTED]."

In short: Google pays a set revenue-sharing percentage to Mozilla to be the default search engine within Firefox.  What is that percentage?  That specific detail is redacted in all of the documentation.

But we do know that the easier Firefox makes it to use a non-Google search engine (such as with a "this time, search with [a non-Google Search Engine]..." feature)... the less money Google pays Mozilla.

And, from ex-CEO Baker's deposition the following details were provided:

"Google’s 2021 revenue share payment to Mozilla was over $400 million, or about 80% of Mozilla’s operating budget.  Mozilla has repeatedly made clear that without these payments, it would not be able to function as it does today."

Which simply confirms what we all have been able to assume for a number of years: Mozilla is dependent on Google to fund current operations.

Should Google be prohibited from continuing this existing deal, it could require a dramatic change to Mozilla: either by forcing Mozilla to find other funding sources... or engage in massive layoffs.

What Happens Now?

But will Google be prohibited from continuing such a "Default Search Engine" deal with Mozilla and others (like Apple)?

That remains to be seen.  At this point Google is likely to appeal the ruling -- which will likely delay any remedy phase of this case.  And, should Google's appeal ultimately fail, the remedy / penalty phase of this case could go in a large number of different directions.

Just the same, a prohibiting of "Default Search Engine" deals (at least as they currently exist), seems like an obvious remedy that is likely to be implemented.  And, should that happen, Mozilla's finances will change in a major way (having 80%+ of your revenue going away will have a massive impact on any business).

None of this, however, will be a surprise to Mozilla... the corporation clearly has seen this coming.

The Firefox Mega-corporation has been making significant changes to their business over the last few years -- downplaying their flagship product (Firefox) while focusing on A.I. investments, purchasing an advertising company, and massive internal power struggles which seem focused on rebuilding Mozilla as an advertising company.

Just the same, considering the lack of realized revenue from their A.I. or Advertising initiatives, it's hard to see how Mozilla will weather this storm without siginificant layoffs.

But the timing -- and details -- of what happens next remains to be seen.

While I have your attention, there were also a few interesting (and amusing) side-notes and tidbits within this legal ruling.

The Government Sees Mozilla as "Marginal"

Within the August 5th ruling there were a number of statements, regarding the Firefox marketshare, which I couldn't help but find somewhat amusing.  

"Firefox’s contribution to the overall search market is so small that the additional output it produces, at most, marginal procompetitive benefits."

... and...

"its share of the browser market is so low that it does not move the competitive needle"

Firefoxes "share of the browser market is so low" that it doesn't "move the needle."

Ouch.

Firefox Experiments on Users

The ruling included several references -- often from the Mozilla ex-CEO's deposition -- to experiments run on Firefox users.  Specifically switching the default search engine for small subsets of users.

"Mozilla has run experiments to assess a potential switch of the default [Search Engine] from Google to a rival. It tends to run these experiments when its agreements come up for renewal."

... and...

"From 2021 to 2022, Mozilla once again switched the default [Search Engine] to Bing for 0.5% of desktop Firefox users."

This sort of experiment was, apparently, repeated regularly.

Have you ever noticed your Firefox default search engine change?  Out of nowhere... your search engine was now... Bing?  You may have been part of one of Mozilla's many experiments on their users.

Considering the rocky terrain that Mozilla is facing -- in part as a consequence of this Google ruling -- my guess is we'll see Mozilla Firefox conducting many additional "experiments" in the months ahead.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
12
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
4Chan and Kiwi Farms File Lawsuit Against UK

It is both an important legal case... and a brilliant trolling of the British government.

The article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/4chan-and-kiwi-farms-file-lawsuit

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:21:00
Microsoft Fires "Intifada" Employees

This last week, a group of anti-Jewish Microsoft employees got rowdy. Microsoft fired some of them and sent The Lunduke Journal a statement. Then held a media briefing. Let's watch it together.

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:27:39
Video of "Worker Intifada" Occupying Microsoft President's Office

Last week the Microsoft "Worker Intifada" ransacked a farmers market and chanted "Go away, Jews!" Today they got arrested in Microsoft's President's office. We have the video.

The Brad Smith office "occupation" video clips:
https://x.com/LundukeJournal/status/1960502030692229479

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:19:50
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

🌈 💥 I suppose that I would spend my time with "Tropico", or the first two "Fallout" games, or entertain myself with "Day of the Tentacle."

😸 I actually felt a little better, "Doom Scrolling" the post.

post photo preview

Reinstalling OSX on my old PPC Mac Mini. It verifies the install CD whether you like it or not. I can't stand that kind of thing. “Oh now, it's for your own good, you know”. My own good is “not having to sit around for half an hour waiting for verification of a disc that I already know is good and don't actually care if it isn't anyway because it's a 20-year-old OS on a 20-year-old machine and I'm only doing this because I messed up a Linux install and actually want to check that the hard disk will still boot an OS”.

Grr.

19 hours ago
post photo preview
Android to Require Developer ID Checks
Want to publish Android software? You'll need to let Google verify your identity. Plus: Google commits to supporting Sideloading and Third Party App Stores.

Google has announced that they will be requiring all Android Apps — including “sideloaded” apps installed outside of the Google Play Store — to undergo developer identity verification.

Android Developer ID Check

“Starting next year, Android will require all apps to be registered by verified developers in order to be installed by users on certified Android devices,” says Google. “Think of it like an ID check at the airport, which confirms a traveler's identity but is separate from the security screening of their bags; we will be confirming who the developer is, not reviewing the content of their app or where it came from.”

 

These requirements will go into full effect in September of 2026 (one year from now), but only for developers in four countries: Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand.

Countries which, according to Google, suffer from “fraudulent app scams, often from repeat perpetrators”.

The idea seems simple enough: If a developer is known to make Android malware, Google will have the ability to block their software from being installed. Thus preventing the spread of Malware.

We will see how well this system works, in practice, next year.

 

It also remains to be seen when this “Google App Developer Identity Verification” requirement will be enforced in other countries (such as the USA). For the moment, Google is simply saying “2027 and beyond”… so there’s still time left for this policy to be modified.

As part of the process, Google is launching a new “Android Developer Console”, specifically for developers to verify their identity and register their applications.

The Practical Impact

What does this new “ID verification” for Android Devs mean… in the real world?

Once this change is worldwide:

  • A developer must be “verified” before their software can be installed via any mechanism — including Sideloaded Apps, and alternative App Stores (such as F-Droid).

  • Developing and publishing Android software, in an anonymous fashion, will no longer be supported.

Google is also, it appears, committing to continuing to allow “sideloading” and third party App Stores for the foreseeable future.

In other words: If a user wants to sideload software, or use F-Droid, Google will allow that. But Google is going to know the real-world identity of the developer / publisher of any software that gets installed.

The War on Sideloading, Revised

Google and Apple have been at war with the concept of “sideloading” (aka “Installing software the normal way”) for several years now. With both companies adding new features to their systems which allow them to block the ability of users to install “non-approved” software.

 

In that context, this particular announcement from Google is a bit of a double edged sword.

From Google’s announcement:

“To be clear, developers will have the same freedom to distribute their apps directly to users through sideloading or to use any app store they prefer. We believe this is how an open system should work—by preserving choice while enhancing security for everyone.”

On the one hand, requiring ID verification for developers is clearly a big step towards increased control over what software is installable on the systems we own.

On the other hand, Google is making it clear they intend to support sideloading & third party App Stores into the future.

Something they have been hesitant about in the past.

Read full Article
post photo preview
All Lunduke Journal Videos Now Free for Everyone
All Articles. All Audio Podcasts. And, yes, all Videos from The Lunduke Journal. Free. For subscribers and non-subscribers alike. On all publishing platforms.

The Short-Short Version: Articles, Podcasts, and Videos — from The Lunduke Journal — are now, once again, free for absolutely everyone. Subscribers and non-Subscribers alike. On all publishing platforms.

The Slightly Less Short Version

A little over two weeks ago, The Lunduke Journal implemented a change. All of the Articles & Audio Podcasts would remain free for everyone… but the Videos would now be published as subscriber exclusives. Non-subscribers would no longer have access to videos.

This was what is known as a “Huge Mistake Made by a Total Bonehead”.

 

While the motivation for that change was well intentioned (to provide some perks for all of the amazing subscribers who make The Lunduke Journal possible, and maybe encourage some new subscribers in the process)… in practice it was an absolute disaster.

The key problem with making all of the videos “Subscriber Exclusives” was, in hindsight, incredibly obvious:

Many people will subscribe to The Lunduke Journal on one platform… but prefer to watch (or read… or listen) to The Lunduke Journal on a completely different platform.

For example: Someone who subscribes on Locals may watch the videos on YouTube. Another person who subscribes on Substack may watch on Rumble. And so on.

And, by making those videos “Subscriber Only”, it made watching The Lunduke Journal’s videos significantly more difficult for… Subscribers. The very people it was supposed to be a perk for.

Whoopsie Daisy

Well. Shoot. I’m man enough to admit when I’ve made a mistake. And, boy howdy, was that a mistake!

 

Effective immediately, Videos are now officially free for everyone (just like the Articles & Podcasts). On all platforms which The Lunduke Journal publishes to. Because making sure reading, listening to, and watching The Lunduke Journal is convenient for all of you is a top priority.

Over the next day, all of the “Subscriber Exclusive” videos (published over the last 2 weeks) will become free for everyone.

Running The Lunduke Journal is Not Easy

Just as an aside: What we’re doing with The Lunduke Journal is… unique.

Pretty much every Tech Journalist is funded by Big Tech. Money for advertisements. Money for sponsorships. Money for “paid articles” that look like real journalism but are, in fact, just repackaged ads and press releases.

Take away that Big Tech money and 9 out of 10 Tech News outlets would go out of business tomorrow. Which means they all need to keep Big Tech happy. And that shows in their coverage (and their refusal to touch many important news stories).

By choosing to not take a single penny from Big Tech, The Lunduke Journal has the freedom to tell the truth. To follow the Tech News stories wherever they lead (no matter who it makes grumpy).

But it also means that keeping The Lunduke Journal in business is even trickier than it is for all of those Brand X Tech News Outlets (which already have a hard time staying afloat, even with the Big Tech moolah).

What’s amazing… is that we, against all odds, have pulled it off. For several years now, The Lunduke Journal has stayed in business without taking a dime from Big Tech. And that’s all thanks to all of you. Thank you for making this possible.

If you haven’t grabbed a subscription, just a reminder that now is a great time to do that. 50% off through the end of August (which is a few days from now).

Want to support The Lunduke Journal having all videos (and everything else) for free for the world? That would be a great way to do it.

Once again. Seriously.

Thank you.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
post photo preview
Omarchy 2.0 - The Arch-Based, Hyprland, Non-Woke Distro
The 2.0 release of the unabashedly nerdy, developer focused, & DEI-free Linux distribution is here. And people are flocking to it.

Omarchy, an Arch-based Linux distribution which self-describes as “An opinionated Arch + Hyprland Setup”, has just published their 2.0 release.

 

Omarchy was started by David Heinemeier Hansson (DHH), the creator of Ruby on Rails, as a command-line and developer focused (and unabashedly nerdy) configuration of Arch Linux.

In the short time since it began (back in June), Omarchy has captured a massive amount of interest and has grown to become a full-fledged distribution in its own right.

Omarchy 2.0 boasts a new ISO installation method, AUR-free installation, a Chrome micro-fork with live theme switching, a Starship prompt, a new icon, and 400 other changes (from 45 contributors).

 

According to DHH, the Omarchy Discord now has over 6,000 members with the website having received over 100,000 unique visitors in the last month.

Not too shabby for a Linux distribution that is only 2 months old.

Speaking of Discord, if the Omarchy installation fails, it displays a QR code with an invite link to the Omarchy support channel. I thought that was a rather nice touch.

 

Worth noting that Omarchy — and the Hyprland window manager, which Omarchy uses by default — both were added to “Lunduke’s Non-Woke Software List” this month.

 

Omarchy is yet another Open Source project which has steered clear of Woke & DEI politics… and has seen tremendous success and adoption. We have seen that same scenario play out repeatedly now, with projects like OpenMandriva, XLibre, Hyprland, & Brave.

Avoid DEI. Experience a flood of users, contributors, and excitement.

A pattern is emerging. Hopefully more projects learn this important lesson.


The Lunduke Journal is the last bastion of truly independent Tech Journalism. Ad Free, Big Tech Free, Non-Woke, & Audience Supported.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals