Comedy • Gaming • News • Science & Tech
Firefox Money: Investigating the bizarre finances of Mozilla
Payments to nonexistent companies? Funding politics? Reliance on a single customer? And that's just for starters.
August 05, 2023
post photo preview

This article was originally published in December of 2022, exclusively for subscribers to The Lunduke Journal.  It is being re-published now -- free for all -- as the importance of this topic (and the bizarre questions surrounding Mozilla) continues to grow.

Mozilla, the Foundation behind the Firefox web browser, is absolutely mammoth — with over One Billion Dollars in assets.

  • Where does all that money come from?

  • Where is it being spent?

  • With Firefox marketshare in a nosedive, how is Mozilla reacting?

The Lunduke Journal spent some time with Mozilla’s financial disclosures and came away with some wild observations — bizarre expenditures (including to companies that don’t even seem to exist) and political organizations with no relationship to Mozilla’s core business.

There’s a lot here. Read to the end. It gets wild.

What, exactly, is Mozilla?

There seems to be a great deal of confusion about what sort of organization Mozilla actually is. Many seem to be under the impression that it is simply a Non-Profit focused on the development of Firefox. And, while that is partially true, it is only a small part of the much bigger picture.

At the top exists the Mozilla Foundation. A not-for-profit corporation that operates out of California.

The Mozilla Foundation is the sole owner (100%) of two for-profit corporations: Mozilla Corporation and MZLA Technologies Corporation.

Both the parent “Foundation” and the wholly owned “Corporation” are run by the same CEO and Executive Chair: Mitchell Baker.

In fact, the “not-for-profit” and “for-profit” aspects of Mozilla are so tightly intertwined that the auditors report makes a point of calling the collective group of three organizations simply “Mozilla”… and reports on their finances as a single entity.

One other misconception that many have is that Mozilla’s primary focus is the development of the Firefox web browser. That does not appear to be the case. These are the three “Areas of Focus” according to The Mozilla Foundation.


Rally Citizens. Connect Leaders. Shape the Agenda.

A strange set of areas to focus on, as you’ll see.

One other item to remember as we go through these details: Firefox market share has been in a free-fall for some time. Depending on the source, it fluctuates between 3% and 7% of the total web browser market.

How much money does Mozilla have?

As of 2021, Mozilla (including the Foundation and the wholly owned For-Profit Corporations), had total assets worth over $1.1 Billion USD. That’s Billion. With a B.


This includes close to $400 Million in cash. Overall assets jumped by roughly $200 Million over the previous year.

As you would expect with such numbers, Mozilla saw a significant increase in revenue in 2021. Up over $100 Million (to just over $600 Million).


At the same time as total revenue was skyrocketing, overall expenses went way (way) down. By roughly $100 Million. With the deepest cuts being focused in “Software development”.


To put it another way: If Mozilla stopped earning money today… it has enough assets to fund their current expenses for roughly 3 years. Thanks in large part to rising revenue combined with cutting software development work.

Where does that money come from?

If you look at the “Change in Net Assets” chart above, you’ll notice that the vast majority of revenue comes from “Royalties” ($527 Million), with advertising and subscriptions ($56 Million) and Contributions ($7 Million) as the next two largest line items.

“Contributions” is donations from people like you. Mozilla actively seeks donations because, as they put it, “We rely on donations to carry out our mission.”


It is worth noting that this statement is not true.

Mozilla does not, in fact, “rely on donations” to carry out their mission. In fact, if you removed donations from the yearly revenue entirely, it would have no impact on Mozilla’s ability to pay for any of their expenditures. And Mozilla could not pay more than a small fraction of their bills from the yearly donations.

Since “Royalties” makes up such a large percentage of Mozilla revenue, let’s drill into that a little bit. Royalties for what, exactly? According to the Foundation’s 2021 report:

“Royalties - Mozilla provides Firefox web browser, which is a free and open-source web browser initially developed by Mozilla Foundation and the Corporation. Mozilla incorporates search engines of its customers as a default status or an optional status available in the Firefox web browser. Mozilla generally receives royalties at a certain percentage of revenues earned by its customers through their search engines incorporated in the Firefox web browser.”

Got it. Search engine deals. That’s the cash cow. And, while the annual report is light on the details, it does provide this key bit of information…

“Approximately 83% and 86% of Mozilla’s revenues from customers with contracts were derived from one customer for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Receivables from that one customer represented 69% and 73% of the December 31, 2021 and 2020 outstanding receivables, respectively.”

In other words: The vast majority (roughly 70%) of all of Mozilla’s yearly revenue comes from default search engine placement of just one customer.

That customer, while not named in the report, is obviously Google (and parent company, Alphabet).

Without that revenue, Mozilla could not continue to operate at their current level of expenditure without eating into their assets.

How much does their leadership earn?

While we’re on the topic of expenditures, it’s worth taking a small detour into the compensation of the Mozilla leadership. From the Mozilla Foundation’s 2021 Form 990:


The head of Mozilla earned roughly $5.6 Million during 2021. The rest of the executive team ranged, more or less, from $100k to $300k.

Interesting to note that the Mozilla CEO earned nearly as much ($5.6 M) as Mozilla received in donations ($7 M).

Also interesting that the CEO received a bonus of nearly $5 Million… considering the precarious position that Mozilla is in (being dependent on a single client continuing to pay for Search Engine placement). Unless there’s a secret deal going on, that looks like a company teetering on the edge to me. Strange to reward a CEO for that sort of future uncertainty.

Where, exactly, does all that money go?

Mozilla is a Billion dollar corporation. While their flagship product is the Firefox Web Browser, the software development needs of Firefox — including manpower, services, and other expenses — do not fully utilize the massive revenue of Mozilla.

Not by a long shot.

Which begs the question… what is all of that money being spent on?

Here is a short sampling, based on available public documentation, of exactly how much money is being spent… and where.



During 2021, Mozilla paid $387 Thousand dollars to someone called “MCKENSIE MACK GROUP.”

“[Mckensie Mack Group] is a change management firm redefining innovation in the white-dominant change management industry.”

From their LinkedIn page, Mckensie Mack Group describes itself thusly: “Black-led and nonbinary-led, MMG is a global social justice organization”.

Mckensie Mack is a public speaker who regularly discusses her anger at “White Colonialism” and her dislike of “CIS” men and women. The “Mckensie Mack” company website blog primarily discusses abortion and Trans related issues.

Why would a company that develops a web browser want to pay her close to half a million dollars (in one year)? That remains unclear. It is, however, worth noting that this is a far larger expense than any of the executive team of Mozilla earn in salary (other than the CEO).



$100,000 was paid to an organization listed as “Action Research Collaborative.”

What, exactly, is “Action Research Collaborative”?

That is a surprisingly difficult question to find an answer to, as they have no website whatsoever.

One of the few references to it is in a Cornell newsletter from earlier this year, where one of the founders states that Action Research Collaborative is a “standing institutional home that can support action research projects that bring together researchers, community members and policymakers, to be able to work together and address pressing issues as they arise.”

Which… doesn’t really tell you much of anything. No product or project. No client. No website. Nothing.

That founder, Neil Lewis Jr., appears to have focused his career on “vaccine acceptance”, problems with “white” people, and his theory that “white people” can not be victims of discrimination.

What does this “Action Research Collaborative” actually do? Why would Mozilla need their services and be willing to pay $100,000 for it?

That remains entirely unknown.

While The Lunduke Journal does not like to delve too deeply into the Political Woods (tm), it should be questioned why so much money — possibly millions of dollars donated by individuals who thought they were supporting a web browser — is being funneled into highly political organizations that seem to have no involvement with the World Wide Web, Web Browsers, or any related standards.

Weird Discretionary Spending


$30,000 to “MC Technical Inc.” in 2021. Who are they? Well, they don’t have a website, that’s for sure. The business registry listing is about the only thing of the company that seems to exist. The listed address is someone’s house.

How does a mostly-non-existent company, with no online presence at all (no website, social media, reviews, etc.), get paid $30,000 in “discretionary” money from Mozilla?

That’s just straight up weird.


And then there’s the $375,000 in discretionary spending given to “New Venture Fund.”

According to Influence Watch:

“The New Venture Fund (NVF) is a 501(c)(3) funding and fiscal sponsorship nonprofit that makes grants to left-of-center advocacy and organizing projects and provides incubation services for other left-of-center organizations. The fund focuses primarily on social and environmental change.”

Mozilla, the developer of Firefox, gave $375,000 to a “Fund” that specifically exists to provide money and services for political organizations of one particular “alignment”.

Why? In what way does this help Firefox? Or Firefox users?

So many questions…

The deeper we dig into Mozilla and their financials, the more questions come up.

  1. Why does Mozilla give so much money to political speakers that have no relationship to their core business?

  2. Why does Mozilla seem unconcerned with alienating a large portion of their user base (which is already shrinking)?

  3. Why do some of the recipients of Mozilla money appear to be nothing more than empty shells of companies — not even having a simple website?

  4. Why does Mozilla continue to take donations if it doesn’t need them?

  5. Where does Mozilla spend those donated dollars? Do they go to the strange discretionary spending or political organizations?

  6. With the 70%+ reliance on Google (a competitor) for revenue, why is Mozilla spending money on projects that have no goal of being profitable (and have no relation to their core business)?

  7. What happens when the Google funding goes away? Mozilla appears certain that it never will (based on their spending)…. why is that?

  8. Why is Mozilla decreasing software development funding when development of Firefox is the cash cow?

And that is, literally, the tip of the iceberg.

The Lunduke Journal has sent out numerous questions and requests for comment to organizations listed here (among many others) to find answers. Will any be forthcoming? It will be interesting to see.

August 5th, 2023 Update: To date, no request for clarification or additional details has been answered.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
What else you may like…
"The return of RSS" - Lunduke's Big Tech Show - September 20th, 2023 - Ep 045

Yes. This is a video.

Yes. RSS Podcast feed is returning.

Lots of good stuff. This is an episode less about the Tech world... and more about The Lunduke Journal.

Watch. Listen. And enjoy.

Live Streamed on September 20, 2023 6:26 PM ET
September 20, 2023
Lunduke's Nerdy Live Stream

Problems with the livestream on Locals? This stream is also live on...



September 18, 2023
Windows 3.1 Week is almost here!


September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
September 12, 2023
"Talking about building Linux Tycoon 3 for Android & Gameboy" - Lunduke Journal Podcast Special Announcement

I'm ridiculously excited about this. So I had to talk about it.

Here's all the details:

"Talking about building Linux Tycoon 3 for Android & Gameboy" - Lunduke Journal Podcast Special Announcement
September 04, 2023
"The Art of Making Windows Tolerable with Chris Titus" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 4th, 2023 - Ep 040

I am joined today by Chris Titus -- Tech YouTube-inator, and software developer -- to talk about his quest to make Microsoft Windows far more enjoyable to use through his "Ultimate Windows Utility". A single application that fixes many of the shortcomings of Windows. Removing telemetry, debloating the system, and other such necessities.

This episode is free for every nerd on Earth -- even those without a subscription to The Lunduke Journal. Feel free to share it with your friends.

"The Art of Making Windows Tolerable with Chris Titus" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 4th, 2023 - Ep 040

Some handy tools for Windows 3.1 here:

Browsers, wing, video players... bunch of good stuff.


This should probably wait till Sunday, but I know me: I'll forget.

post photo preview
How to run Windows 3.1 software on Windows 10 & 11 (64bit) & Linux
Because... because... why not?

Modern, 64bit versions of Windows… don’t support running Windows 3.1 software.

Linux distributions can’t run Windows 3.1 software either. (At least… not out of the box.)

This is, obviously, a tragedy. How on Earth are we expected to play Castle of the Winds or SkiFree on modern operating systems!?

Luckily, Wine does an astoundingly good job of supporting Windows 3.1 software… though many might not realize it (as most people are focused on the support for Windows 95 and later software).

On Windows

If you’re on Windows, you’ll want to grab a copy of Winevdm — a version of Wine specifically for running Windows 3.1 software on modern 64 bit Windows. Free and open source. Good stuff.

Installation is dog simple. Run “install” and — shazam — you can now run Castle of the Winds on Windows 10 / 11. Along with just about anything else you might like.

I don’t use Windows very often. But, when I do, I darn well better have access to Castle of the Winds and SkiFree. Darn it.

On Linux

Things are even easier on Linux. Simply install Wine from the default repositories for your distribution.

On Debian (and Ubuntu, etc.):

sudo apt-get install wine

On Fedora:

sudo dnf install wine

On Arch:

sudo pacman -S wine

Whamo. You’re good to go.

There are other ways…

Using Wine to run Windows 3.1 software (either on Linux or Windows) works fairly well for the majority of software out there. But, occasionally, you’ll run into snags.

Sometimes… some pretty big ones.

For those instances, looking at running Windows 3.1 in a dedicated emulator (such as QEMU, VirtualBox, or DOSbox) is going to net far more desirable results.

But, if the software you need runs in Wine, that route will give you the most “seamless” experience… as the software will run, in its own window, alongside the rest of your software.

Read full Article
post photo preview
DOS + Windows 3.11... on a single floppy!
Seriously! Fully functional Windows 3.11 booting on just ONE floppy! Bonkers!

Check out this craziness! Someone managed to squeeze a version of MS-DOS 7.1 and Windows 3.11 onto a single 3.5” floppy.

I repeat: You can boot directly into Windows 3.11… off a single Floppy.

Whoever created it goes by “DOS China Union” (seems to be a group of people)… and did this work back in 2006. I hadn’t seen this until now (and the original Geocities webpage is long gone), luckily a version is also hosted up at

Seriously. It’s absolutely insane. Check this out:

That’s what it looks like when first launching.

It then asks if you want to launch “Mini-Windows”, or just boot into DOS 7.1.

Shazam! There it is! Windows 3.11 booting entirely off a floppy drive!

And it works.

Sure, a lot of the software you’d normally expect isn’t there. But it has just enough to use. Which is pretty gosh darned impressive.

There’s the bootable floppy disk when looking at it in the Windows File Manager. Barebones… but functional. Amazing.

You can grab the floppy .img file from and it’ll boot in just about any emulator (or you can write the image to an actual floppy and boot from real hardware).

I’m going to be honest. I don’t have an actual use for this. But it’s such an incredibly cool accomplishment that I just had to share.

Read full Article
September 20, 2023
post photo preview
Windows 3.1 Week has begun!

Starting this very moment -- Wednesday, September 20th, 2023 at 8am Central Time -- The Lunduke Journal will be celebrating "Windows 3.1 Week"!

A chance to marvel in the beauty that is Windows 3.1!  To experience it all over again -- or for the first time -- and enjoy all of its quirks and peculiarities.  To run software from the Windows 3.1 era... and to see just how far we can push Windows 3.1 using modern hardware and services.

This week will include articles and shows from The Lunduke Journal -- and the entire community is invited to also post their own Windows 3.1 related awesomeness (in the form of screenshots, questions, cried for help, stories, etc.) to

There are many ways to enjoy Windows 3.1 (and related software) during the week, inclusing:

  • Running on hardware or in virtual machines
  • Windows 3.1 or 3.11 (or Windows for Workgroups)
  • An OS/2 version which includes Windows 3.1 (OS/2 Warp, eComStation, or ArcaOS)
  • Running Windows 3.1 software via WINE

There's no wrong way to run Windows 3.1!

This wonderful Windows-y week will run until 8am on September 27th, 2023.  A full week.  Of Windows 3.1.  Wild.

You can watch Lunduke's intro video here on Locals.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals