Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Mozilla Firefox Goes Anti-Privacy, Pro-Advertising
After buying advertising company, the browser maker goes all-in on data collection.
July 15, 2024
post photo preview

Mozilla is positioning itself as an Advertising and Artificial Intelligence company, and is actively sacrificing the security and privacy of Firefox users to be successful in that business.

Need proof of such an outlandish claim?

Look no further than the recent release of Firefox version 128... and the inclusion of "Privacy-Preserving Attribution".

What in the heck is "Privacy-Preserving Attribution"?

"Hey!  Privacy preserving!  That sounds fantastic!  What's the problem?"

This is, in essence, a bit of functionality -- specifically designed for online advertisers, and websites which implement advertising -- which collects and reports browsing activity back to the advertising companies.

"But it uses the word 'Privacy'!  That means it's private!  And that's good!"

Naming this bit of functionality "Privacy-Preserving Attribution" was a stroke of deceptive genius... as it truly does not preserve privacy.  By design.

This is an example of doublespeak, in line with : "War is Peace", "Freedom is Slavery", and "2 + 2 = 5".

To fully understand the issue, let's look at how "Privacy-Preserving Attribution" works (from a very high level).  Step-by-step.

  1. The Firefox web browser collects your data as you browse a website.
  2. That data is sent to a Mozilla server.
  3. Mozilla then bundles all the data from multiple users together -- into batches -- and sends those batches of data to the servers of advertisers.

Now, in theory, this would allow some of the data being sent to advertisers... to be potentially a bit more private.  Or, at least, slightly obfuscated by having the data of multiple users smashed together.

Unfortunately there are three key problems:

  1. The data being sent to the Mozilla server is neither anonymous, nor private.  Mozilla knows everything.
  2. Mozilla now owns an advertising company.  Mozilla is the advertiser.  Which means Mozilla is sending your private, identifiable data from one of their servers... to another one of their servers.
  3. Even if neither of those two points were true, there is enough data sent -- even in batches -- to reconstruct personal, identifiable information.

As you can see, "Privacy-Preserving Attribution" appears to be custom designed to give the appearance of privacy... without actually providing true privacy.

The Path of Mozilla

Let's put all of this into the context of what has been happening with Mozilla over the last few years.

What can we determine from all of this?

It certainly is obvious -- especially considering the actions over the last few months -- that Mozilla is being driven towards an anti-privacy, pro-AI, pro-Advertising business.

If their recent activities are any indication of their future actions, it seems reasonable to expect more AI and Advertising announcements over the next few months.

Which, for people who use Firefox as a "pro-privacy" browser, may not be welcome news.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
23
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Pop!_OS Lead: Linux Developers are “Patronizing Pedantic Megalomaniacs”

System76’s Principal Engineer doesn’t “even try to contribute to the Linux kernel anymore.”

The article:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/6052448/pop-os-lead-linux-developers-are-patronizing-pedantic-megalomaniacs

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:22:45
Zuck Regrets Censoring Facebook at Request of Democrats

"The White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire."

Warning: This show is extremely political. It has to be. There simply is no way to discuss the topic without being political. Just the same, the core of the topic is regarding the usability of digital, online publishing and messaging platforms -- a topic near and dear to the heart of those of us who have lived through the ages of the BBS, Usenet, Geocities, and the like.

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:40:29
Is A.I. Programming Really the Future?

Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, Google & everyone else says Artificial Intelligence is the future. Is my anti-AI stance reasonable?

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:23:22
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

I am probably not going to make friends for saying this, but I think moving the Linux kernel to Rust is not good for the future of Linux. While I love the FOSS philosophy and I am not a Rust or C programmer, I just don't have a lot of confidence in the major players making these decisions.

A wild Lunduke meme!

post photo preview

Even as my feelings towards Linux turn into a giant Meh! I have to be honest that I am still a fan of what all one can do with it. I think things like the MNT Pocket Reform are excellent. I think Debian running on it is a great choice. I also think that performance on the Pocket is on par with the Surface Go 4 I have. I think this is also an accomplishment.

Meanwhile I am improving my ability to type on the thing, but it means that everytime I move my fingers from the standard keys I have to look at the keyboard to avoid mistakes.

Anyway, if I had to use Desktop Linux (and seriously who cares about the whole GNU/Linux bullcrap) I would go with Debian for sure.

post photo preview
post photo preview
Last week at The Lunduke Journal (Aug 25 - Aug 31, 2024)
Telegram CEO arrested! Zuck grows a conscience! Pop!_OS won't work with Linux!

The Telegram CEO gets arrested in France.  Mark Zuckerberg spontaneously grows a conscience.  The Pop!_OS / System76 Lead Engineer refuses to work with Linux kernel developers.

What a weird friggin' week.  I'll be honest.  Didn't have any of those on my bingo card for the week.

The Videos

The Articles

Previous Few Weeks

 

Reminder: Check out The Lunduke Journal Link Central page for all the handy URLS.  Podcast RSS feeds, contact info, direct links to some of the big shows and articles and a bunch of other goodies.  And be sure to subscribe to The Lunduke Journal to help support the work... and make sure you don't miss out on anything.

Read full Article
September 01, 2024
post photo preview
Funny Programming Pictures Part LIII
Now with over 50% programming pictures! (tm)

Are all of these pictures about programming?  No.

Are all of these pictures even about computers?  No.  No, they are not.

But I did find all of them on the Inter-Tubes.  And I CTRL-C / CTRL-V'd them using a computer.  So.  You know.  There's that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
Pop!_OS Lead: Linux Developers are “Patronizing Pedantic Megalomaniacs”
System76’s Principal Engineer doesn’t “even try to contribute to the Linux kernel anymore.”

The Principal Engineer of System 76 (and the lead developer of System 76's Pop!_OS Linux distribution) has declared the Linux kernel is run by "patronizing pedantic megalomaniacs" and that he doesn't "even try to contribute to the Linux kernel anymore."

While, at first glance, these statements read like yet another round of "Open Source Drama" -- the Open Source world and "Drama" certainly go hand in hand -- the fact that the lead maintainer of one of the most prominent Linux distributions is refusing to have any involvement with the Linux kernel itself... is absolutely fascinating.

And this all seems to stem... from Rust.

Seriously.

Rust & Linux Conflict

Yesterday (August 28th), Wedson Filho (a developer working on migrating some Linux code to Rust) sent the following email to the Linux Kernel mailing list:

 

 

"I am retiring from the project.  After almost 4 years, I find myself lacking the energy and enthusiasm I once had to respond to some of the nontechnical nonsense, so it's best to leave it up to those who still have it in them."

As an example of the reason he is retiring from the "Rust for Linux" project, Wedson included a clip of a YouTube recording from the Q & A portion of a presentation on Linux Filestyems at Linux Foundation  event.

 

 

During that presentation, it was suggested that developers of Linux File System support (currently in C) needed to do significant work to accomodate developers who wanted to migrate Linux File System support to the Rust programming language.

One of the audience members disagreed with that -- saying "you're trying to convince everyone to switch over to the religion" of Rust.  Which he followed up by saying, "that ain't gonna happen".

The discussion went back and forth for a few moments and then the presentation moved on.

In short: Developers working on existing Linux kernel functionality (in C), want to continue working on their code.  Rust developers want them to either port the existing code to Rust, or spend time helping others to port it to Rust.

This, by itself, is an interesting debate as it could have rather sweeping ramifications to the Linux kernel (and related code).  But then something truly strange happened...

Enter: System76 & Pop!_OS

That's when Jeremy Soller, the Principal Engineer of System76 (a laptop and desktop PC company focused on shipping computers with Linux, specifically with their in-house developed Pop!_OS distribution), chimed in with his thoughts over on X.

 

 

"This kind of treatment is exactly why I started Redox OS from scratch and written primarily in Rust.  There is a lot of resistance to even minor beneficial change in Linux and related projects.  I don't even try to contribute to the Linux kernel anymore."

 

It's that last line that caught my eye.  "I don't even try to contribute to the Linux kernel anymore."

The lead of software engineering at a company which ships Linux hardware... refuses to work with the Linux kernel?

How utterly peculiar.  This would seem to be a massive problem (certainly an inconvenience) for System76.

But then Jeremy Soller continues... by directly, personally attacking Linux kernel developers (and, seemingly, Linus Torvalds and the rest of the Linux kernel maintainers).

 

 

"There are projects where you will inevitably have to get your changes past patronizing pedantic megalomaniacs and while the Linux kernel is not only developed by this personality type it is overwhelmingly controlled by it."

 

Patronizing pedantic megalomaniacs.

Not exactly mincing words.

Putting aside wether the System76 lead is right or wrong about any of that... it would seem to be a bizarre business strategy to directly attack and insult the people building the software which your own product relies upon.  Especially when you refuse to work on that same software.

Again, here's what we are seeing:

  • System76 ships an OS (Pop!_OS) with the Linux kernel.
  • System76 ships hardware with the Linux kernel.
  • System76 leadership refuses to work on the Linux kernel.
  • System76 leadership insults the people who do work on the Linux kernel (including the leadership of Linux).
  • That conflict appears to be originating from Rust advocates unhappy when C programmers refuse to work on Rust.

While the Open Source and Linux world is certainly no stranger to drama and conflict... this goes beyond mere "drama" and into the realm of having a significant impact on the business of System76 (both in terms of engineering and public perception).

Likewise, what does this mean for the Pop!_OS Linux distribution?  If the lead on that project (funded and run by System76) refuses to work on Linux -- and personally insults Linux kernel leadership -- what impact will that have on that particular distribution?

And all of this appears to be rooted in an anger that Rust developers have towards C programmers working on the Linux kernel.

An anger so strong... engineering leadership at System76 is willing to significantly harm his company over.

Utterly bizarre.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals