Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Mozilla Firefox Goes Anti-Privacy, Pro-Advertising
After buying advertising company, the browser maker goes all-in on data collection.
July 15, 2024
post photo preview

Mozilla is positioning itself as an Advertising and Artificial Intelligence company, and is actively sacrificing the security and privacy of Firefox users to be successful in that business.

Need proof of such an outlandish claim?

Look no further than the recent release of Firefox version 128... and the inclusion of "Privacy-Preserving Attribution".

What in the heck is "Privacy-Preserving Attribution"?

"Hey!  Privacy preserving!  That sounds fantastic!  What's the problem?"

This is, in essence, a bit of functionality -- specifically designed for online advertisers, and websites which implement advertising -- which collects and reports browsing activity back to the advertising companies.

"But it uses the word 'Privacy'!  That means it's private!  And that's good!"

Naming this bit of functionality "Privacy-Preserving Attribution" was a stroke of deceptive genius... as it truly does not preserve privacy.  By design.

This is an example of doublespeak, in line with : "War is Peace", "Freedom is Slavery", and "2 + 2 = 5".

To fully understand the issue, let's look at how "Privacy-Preserving Attribution" works (from a very high level).  Step-by-step.

  1. The Firefox web browser collects your data as you browse a website.
  2. That data is sent to a Mozilla server.
  3. Mozilla then bundles all the data from multiple users together -- into batches -- and sends those batches of data to the servers of advertisers.

Now, in theory, this would allow some of the data being sent to advertisers... to be potentially a bit more private.  Or, at least, slightly obfuscated by having the data of multiple users smashed together.

Unfortunately there are three key problems:

  1. The data being sent to the Mozilla server is neither anonymous, nor private.  Mozilla knows everything.
  2. Mozilla now owns an advertising company.  Mozilla is the advertiser.  Which means Mozilla is sending your private, identifiable data from one of their servers... to another one of their servers.
  3. Even if neither of those two points were true, there is enough data sent -- even in batches -- to reconstruct personal, identifiable information.

As you can see, "Privacy-Preserving Attribution" appears to be custom designed to give the appearance of privacy... without actually providing true privacy.

The Path of Mozilla

Let's put all of this into the context of what has been happening with Mozilla over the last few years.

What can we determine from all of this?

It certainly is obvious -- especially considering the actions over the last few months -- that Mozilla is being driven towards an anti-privacy, pro-AI, pro-Advertising business.

If their recent activities are any indication of their future actions, it seems reasonable to expect more AI and Advertising announcements over the next few months.

Which, for people who use Firefox as a "pro-privacy" browser, may not be welcome news.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
23
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
With Git Moving to Rust, How Long Until a Git Fork?

Git 3.0 is scheduled to ship "second half of 2026", with a mandatory requirement of Rust. Which means Git will no longer build on many platforms. Setting the stage for a successful fork.

The Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscription:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/the-lunduke-journal-lifetime-subscription

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:15:13
February 06, 2026
NetBSD Says No to Rust

"Rust in the core of NetSD is probably a non-starter," says long-time NetBSD developer. "Keeping Rust working is quite a bit of work."

The Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscription:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/the-lunduke-journal-lifetime-subscription

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:20:49
February 05, 2026
PSX Emu Dev Says No Packaging for Arch or NixOS

Connor McLaughlin, the developer of Duckstation, a popular Playstation emulator, calls NixOS and Arch Linux "hostile package environments", and blocks building for those Linux distributions.

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:13:03
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

Controversial opinion.

I think Lunduke is wrong on Rust.

I has clearly been adopted by the next generation. It can plug in very nicely into various ecosystems and tools. I am planning to adopt it as well for app development (logic part, not the view).

At the end of the day, if modern kids, people etc want to use Rust then it makes sense for the projects to start exploring it and investing in it today.

Not doing so might lead to old timers retiring without anyone left to replace them.

Rust is not a bad language at all. It definitely has a bad reputation for the way it was being pushed a few years back. But honestly, I don't see those "rewrite in Rust" mobs much these days.

U see people doing amazing projects and organic adoption skyrocketing.

That's why I don't think adding Rust into traditionaly C code bases is a bad idea.
It prepares the project for the "changing of the guard".

This was always bound to happen some day if not Rust then Zig or something else but as it turned out, it's Rust.

February 06, 2026

Life reward - iPad time with my grandson.

Shhhh - he doesn’t know it’s a refurbed Android tablet 😎

post photo preview

It's bad enough that "they" want to put RUST in every FOSS Project.

However, forcing children to Learn RUST as their First Language is taking things too far.

post photo preview
January 31, 2026
$89 Lifetime Offer Ends at Midnight!

I’ll make this quick: The $89 Lifetime Subscription offer for The Lunduke Journal ends at midnight tonight (Saturday, January 31st).

Once the calendar reads “February” — poof — the deal is gone.

If you wanted to save 70% on a Lifetime Subscription, these are your final hours.

A huge thank you to everyone who has signed up during this crazy deal. We are this close to filling up the 4th Lifetime Subscriber Wall (there’s a possibility it might fill up in the next few hours).

Far beyond anything I was expecting. All of you are absolutely amazing. The Lunduke Journal would not be possible without you.

If you were on contemplating grabbing that Lifetime Sub, I’d jump on it right now. The price goes back up to normal ($300) in about 12 hours or so.

Get it while it’s cheap!

-Lunduke

Read full Article
January 30, 2026
The End of the $89 Lifetime Sub is Nigh!

Quick reminder: The massive deal The Lunduke Journal has been running — 70%+ off Lifetime Subscriptions, 50% off all other subscriptions — ends after tomorrow (Saturday, January 31st).

Considering that, here are the steps I recommend:

  1. Grab the $89 Lifetime Subscription before it ends tomorrow night.

  2. High five yourself for saving money and supporting Indie Tech Journalism.

  3. Maybe… grab a donut?

That is all.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
January 25, 2026
$89 Lifetime Lunduke Subs ends this week!

Quick heads up, that the $89 Lifetime Subscription to The Lunduke Journal discount ends… at the end of this week!

Discounting Lifetime Subscriptions by over 70% was an absolute blast. So many of you took advantage of the offer that we’re now up to four Lifetime Subscriber walls at the end of every video. Crazy!

But something that awesome can’t last forever. Which means that, in just a few days, Lifetime Subscriptions will return to their regular price of $300.

With no plans to do another wild discount like that any time soon.

So.

  1. If you haven’t already, snag an $89 (via Bitcoin) or $99 (via Substack or Locals) Lifetime Subscription.

  2. Then let me know if you’d like to be added to the Lifetime Wall of Shame Awesomeness.

My guess is, a the current rate, that 4th Lifetime Wall will be full by Friday.

Bonkers.

And, once again, thank you to each and every subscriber. The Lunduke Journal would not be possible without you.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals