Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
The True History of vi (and vim)
How a broken pascal compiler, a 300 baud modem, and a 1970s terminal helped create the (in)famous text editor.
August 08, 2023
post photo preview

Earlier this week (August 3rd, 2023), Bram Moolenaar, creator and long-time maintainer of Vim passed away.  The following article -- originally published earlier this year -- has been updated to include a brief history of Vim.


Everyone who has spent any time with UNIX or Linux knows about vi — the ubiquitous text editor that seems to have existed since the dawn of time itself.

Likewise, there are better than even odds that the first time you ran vi (or vim, which is based on vi)… you got stuck and couldn’t figure out how to exit the gosh-darned program.

Don’t feel ashamed. It’s a right of passage.

Your first experience with vi / vim looked something like this. You know it’s true.

What follows is the story of that much loved — and much hated — text editor. Where it came from, who created it, how it was almost very different, and why on earth it is the way it is.

It all started with ed

As with so many stories in computer history, the tale of vi begins long before vi, itself, ever comes into existence.

Our story begins in August of 1969, at AT&T Bell Labs.

There, Ken Thompson was beginning work on what would become UNIX. At that time it was a barebones system, running on a PDP-7, consisting of only three little components: an assembler, a shell… and a simple text editor known as “ed”.

Ed, which is (obviously) short for “editor”, is a line-mode text editor — meaning you edit one line of text at a time. A process which can drive any person to the brink of madness.

Being a line editor, ed doesn’t look like much. So here’s a screenshot of the ed manpage.

Historical Side Note: The design of ed was inspired by QED (which is short for “Quick EDitor"“) — a similar line-mode text editor created for the Berkeley Time Sharing System in the mid-1960s — and was re-written for MULTICS (the precursor to UNIX) by Ken Thompson. So it seems natural that, when Thompson needed a basic text editor for UNIX… he would base it on the design of QED, which he was already so familiar with.

Ed quickly became the defacto line-mode text editor for UNIX — remaining a part of the POSIX standard to this very day.

A wild Pascal appears

A few years later, in 1975, Ken Thompson went to Berkeley (the University of California) and built a Pascal compiler for UNIX.

There, his Pascal compiler came to the attention of a student at UC Berkeley… Bill Joy. The man who would go on to create vi.

From Bill Joy’s 1999 interview with Linux Magazine:

“What happened is that Ken Thompson came to Berkeley and brought this broken Pascal system, and we got this summer job to fix it. While we were fixing it, we got frustrated with the editor we were using which was named ed. ed is certainly frustrating.”

As with so many stories in the advancement of software… work begins when a programmer gets frustrated with existing software.

“We got this code from a guy named George Coulouris at University College in London called em - Editor for Mortals - since only immortals could use ed to do anything. By the way, before that summer, we could only type in uppercase. That summer we got lowercase ROMs for our terminals. It was really exciting to finally use lowercase.”

Anyone who has used ed for any sizable project knows how frustrating it can be to use. While ed has many strengths (and is great for usage via shell scripts) editing large portions of text is not one of them.

Now, with inspiration from the “em” text editor, things really kicked into gear.

From the August 1984 issue of UNIX Review:

“So Chuck (Haley) and I looked at that and we hacked on em for a while, and eventually we ripped the stuff out of em and put some of it into what was then called en, which was really ed with some em features. Chuck would come in at night - we really didn't work exactly the same hours although we overlapped in the afternoon. I'd break the editor and he'd fix it and then he'd break it and I'd fix it. I got really big into writing manual pages, so I wrote manual pages for all the great features we were going to do but never implemented.”

Put simply… ed + em = en. Sort of.

Also, I love the whole “I wrote manual pages for all the great features we were going to do but never implemented” part. Been there!

Modems and Terminals and vi weirdness

Back to the 1999 Linux Magazine interview:

I don't know if there was an eo or an ep but finally there was ex. [laughter] I remember en but I don't know how it got to ex. So I had a terminal at home and a 300 baud modem so the cursor could move around and I just stayed up all night for a few months and wrote vi.”

ed… em… en… [eo… ep?]… ex… then, finally, vi.

That is how we got to vi. The family tree of vi, if you will.

Worth noting here that “vi” is short for “visual mode of ex”. Running “vi” is literally a shortcut for launching the “ex” text editor directly into the full screen “visual mode” instead of the default “line mode”

In fact, if you were already running ex, you could enter the “visual mode” by entering the vi command.

And, what’s that? Vi was programmed on a 300 baud modem?

Seriously. Considering a 300 baud modem is 1/4th the speed of a 1200 baud modem (which transmits text slower than most people can read it)… this explains much of the design of vi.

“It was really hard to do because you've got to remember that I was trying to make it usable over a 300 baud modem. That's also the reason you have all these funny commands. It just barely worked to use a screen editor over a modem. It was just barely fast enough.”

Here, Bill Joy compares the reasons behind the design differences between emacs and vi:

“The people doing Emacs were sitting in labs at MIT with what were essentially fibre-channel links to the host, in contemporary terms. They were working on a PDP-10, which was a huge machine by comparison, with infinitely fast screens.

So they could have funny commands with the screen shimmering and all that, and meanwhile, I'm sitting at home in sort of World War II surplus housing at Berkeley with a modem and a terminal that can just barely get the cursor off the bottom line.

It was a world that is now extinct. People don't know that vi was written for a world that doesn't exist anymore.

Short, single character commands in vi kept things usable even of that slow connection.

As Bill Joy put it, “vi was written for a world that doesn't exist anymore.”

While the hardware limitation of the 300 baud modem had a significant influence on the design of vi… arguably the terminal (and keyboard) being used by Bill Joy had an even bigger impact.

That terminal: the ADM-3A built by Lear Siegler.

The ADM-3A is the model of terminal that Bill Joy programmed ex visual mode (aka vi) on.

For example: Why does vi use H, J, K, and L for cursor movement? Because, on the ADM-3A, those keys doubled as the arrow keys.

The keyboard layout of the ADM-3A.

You’ll also note that the Escape key is where the Tab key is on most modern keyboard. That’s why Esc is the vi mode switching key… it was, on that keyboard, easy to hit without moving your left hand off of the home row.

And, despite common keyboard layouts no longer being like this, vi stayed this way.

Vi almost changed significantly

A fun little sidenote: Bill Joy almost added multi-window support and other features… but he didn’t have backups of his code. And, as is the way, he lost that code.

“I was in the process of adding multiwindows to vi when we installed our VAX, which would have been in December of '78. We didn't have any backups and the tape drive broke. I continued to work even without being able to do backups. And then the source code got scrunched and I didn't have a complete listing. I had almost rewritten all of the display code for windows, and that was when I gave up. After that, I went back to the previous version and just documented the code, finished the manual and closed it off. If that scrunch had not happened, vi would have multiple windows, and I might have put in some programmability - but I don't know.”

Yep. We were this close to vi being quite different in those early days.

But the source code got “scrunched”.

Which is a technical term. I think.

Vi… forever

In May of 1979, Bill Joy — who was also the driving force behind BSD — released the first public version of vi (the visual mode for the ex text editor) as part of the 2nd release of the Berkeley Software Distribution (2BSD).

While, at this point, BSD was not yet a full operating system — it was an archive of a few pieces of software for UNIX — this was the launching pad for what would become one of the most famous (and infamous) text editors ever created.

While vi may have initially only been distributed to a mere 75 people (as part of the 2BSD archive)… it would go on to become a standard of POSIX, distributed on nearly every UNIX-alike system for the last 40 years.

More likely than not, people will be struggling to escape from vi another 40 years into the future.

Heck. A million years from now only three things will remain: cockroaches, Hostess Twinkies, and vi.

All because Bill Joy used an ADM-3A terminal on a 300 baud connection to build a text editor to fix a broken Pascal compiler.

Not too darned shabby for a mode of a text editor written for a world that doesn't exist anymore.

The Story of Vim

As popular -- and historically significant -- as vi is... one of vi's clones is, arguably, even more widely used: Vim.  Linux users regularly vote for Vim as their favorite text editor (or, at least, one of their favorites).

The path from vi to Vim wound through Unix, Atari ST, and Amiga systems... and back again.

  • In 1987, a man named Tim Thompson created a vi clone (from scratch, with no code copied from vi) for the Atari ST.  He called it STEVIE (which stands for ST Editor for VI Enthusiasts.)
  • In 1988, STEVIE was ported to OS/2, Amiga, and UNIX by Tony Andrews.
  • Later in 1988, Bram Moolenaar took the source code for the Amiga port of STEVIE and began modifying it to meet his own needs.  The result was Vim (or "Vi IMitation").  Because it wasn't a fork or port of Vi... but an imitation.
  • Moolenaar would continue to work on Vim for the next few years, eventually making the first public release in 1991.

Eventually (in 1993), the "Vi IMitiation" name was changed to "Vi IMproved"... and Vim was ported to an incredible number of platforms -- from UNIX to DOS to Haiku.

And it still uses those same, crazy, vi default keys... inspired by the ADM-3A.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
17
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Trans Pride Month Starts Early for GNOME

One month is not enough "PRIDE" for the GNOME Foundation. The Open Source Desktop Environment wants PRIDE Month to be "5 or 6 weeks long".... and has already started.

00:16:05
Microsoft Creates MS-DOS EDIT.COM Clone in Rust

The classic DOS text editor has returned! Sort of. And it's written in Rust.

00:21:14
Open Source SQL Workbench Says "No Republicans Allowed!"

The Apache licensed SQL query tool says Republicans (and many others) are not welcome to use their software due to "despicable politics" and "contempt for human rights."

00:17:14
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

I think I could go for staff meetings like this:

post photo preview

I think of that one interview @Lunduke did years ago.

post photo preview
50% off Monthly, Yearly Subscriptions! Lifetime Subs for $100! Let's get everyone subscribing to The Lunduke Journal!

The number of free subscribers to The Lunduke Journal has absolutely exploded — across a bunch of platforms — which is truly amazing. The real Tech News is spreading farther than ever.

In fact, the free subscriber growth is so utterly massive, that if even a tiny fraction of you became a paying subscriber… The Lunduke Journal would become comfortably financially set for a very long time. Able to continue reporting on Big Tech — and corrupt Tech Foundations — well into the future.

All without taking a penny from Big Tech.

With that in mind, let’s do something awesome… something that will make Big Tech really grumpy.

Let’s get as many people subscribing to The Lunduke Journal as possible. Right now. This week. Let’s make this Big-Tech-Free, Non-Woke Tech News publication financially set for a good, long time.

To give everyone a kick-in-the-butt to help make that happen, I’m going to discount absolutely every type of subscription in a crazy way — through Friday, May 9th.

  • %50 off Monthly — Now $3 / Month (was $6 / Month)

  • %50 off Yearly — Now $27 / Year (was $54 / Year)

  • %50 off Yearly MP4 Downloads — Now $27 / Year (was $54 / Year)

  • %50 off Lifetime Subscriptions — Now $100 (was $200)

That Lifetime Subscription one is crazy.

Seriously. Make a one-time donation of $100, and be subscribed to The Lunduke Journal… for life. (This includes full access to the community Forum.)

If even 1% of the new free subscribers who have joined in the last month take advantage of this… The Lunduke Journal will be fully funded through the end of this year. And then some.

Let’s make it happen. Scroll down. Pick which ever subscription type works best for you. Then high-five yourself for making Big Tech grumpy.

Just be sure to do it by the end of the day on Friday, May 9th. The prices all go back to normal after that.

50% Off Yearly or Monthly Subscription:

50% off a Yearly or Monthly subscription to The Lunduke Journal are available via both Locals and Substack. (This includes full access to the community Forum.)

That means $3 / Month. Or $27 / Year (which works out to $2.25 / Month).

Via Lunduke.Locals.com:

Via Lunduke.Substack.com:

The Famous Lifetime Subscription:

The "World Famous Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscription" is exactly what it sounds like. Pay once and get full access to The Lunduke Journal. For life.

And now, through Friday, May 9th… you can snag one at a crazy discount. Normally these are $200… but you can grab one for $100. (You can also pay more if you’d like to donate a little extra.)

The Lifetime Subscription can be obtained via Locals, Substack, or using Bitcoin. All three options work great and are super easy. Scroll down and choose your option.

How to get a Lifetime Subscription via Locals:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Locals.com/support.

  2. Select "Give Once".

  3. Enter "100" (or more) into the amount field.

  4. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

How to get a Lifetime Subscription via Substack:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Substack.com/subscribe.

  2. Select the “Lifetime Subscription” option.

  3. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

If you would also like full, Lifetime access to Lunduke.Locals.com (which is included):

  1. Make a free account on Lunduke.Locals.com.

  2. Email “bryan at lunduke.com” with the email address you use on both Substack and Locals (can be different email addresses).

  3. Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status on Locals.

How to get a Lifetime Subscription with Bitcoin:

You can also obtain a Lifetime Subscription via Bitcoin.

bc1qyjakve8fywm8pz2v99v57yhjj0vzr2vjze6fcq

  • Email "bryan at lunduke.com" with the following information: What time you made the transaction, how much was sent (in Bitcoin), and the email address you use (or plan to use) on Locals.com or Substack.com.

50% Off DRM-Free, MP4 Downloads:

Want to be able to download every show The Lunduke Journal releases (and watch them on whatever device you like)? Yeah. You can do that. For 50% off.

Note: This DRM-Free download option does not include access to the Forum. This option is strictly for downloading the episodes.

Make a One Time Donation

Subscription not enough (or not your thing)? Want to toss in a one-time donation to The Lunduke Journal? There’s a few great options!

Via BitCoin:

Send any amount of BTC to the following address:

bc1qyjakve8fywm8pz2v99v57yhjj0vzr2vjze6fcq

  • Email "bryan at lunduke.com" with to let us know it was you! You can choose to keep your donation anonymous if you prefer. (Either way, all BTC donations get included in the matching deal.)

Via Locals:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Locals.com/support.

  2. Click “GIVE ONCE”.

  3. Enter any amount you like.

You Make This Possible

A huge thank you to all of the subscribers who have made The Lunduke Journal possible. Because of you, we have been able to do true Tech Journalism — to tell the stories that no other Tech News outlet has the cajones to touch.

And to all of you new Lunduke Journal subscribers: Welcome to the last bastion of truly independent, Big-Tech-Free, ad-free, non-Woke Tech Journalism.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
Lunduke Interviewed by Side Scrollers

Yesterday I joined the Side Scrollers show for an hour-long interview.

We covered the Adobe Copyright fight, PewDiePie and Linux, Pokemon Go and the CIA, and how The Lunduke Journal came to be. Definitely worth a watch. I join the show around the 56 minute mark.

 

Next Monday (May 12th), I’ll be a guest on Citizen Podcast with Dan Hollaway.

Critically Important Reminder: The Lunduke Journal refuses to take any funding from Big Tech. The coverage from The Lunduke Journal is only possible because of you.

And with efforts to silence The Lunduke Journal ramping up (including fraudulent copyright take-downs on YouTube), your support is needed more than ever before. If you haven’t already become a subscriber… there’s a lot of options.

All of them make a huge difference:

Without your support, so many stories about Big Tech and Woke Tech would never get told.

Seriously. Now’s the time to support this work, if you are able.

And a huge thank you to each and every one of you. You are making the Tech World a better place.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
Adobe silences Lunduke, "GNOME is Antifa", & Linux Leftists v. PewDiePie
The Lunduke Journal coverage for the week ending May 4th, 2025.

This has been one heck of a weird week — both for Open Source in general, and The Lunduke Journal in particular.

From GNOME contributors declaring that “GNOME is Antifa” to Open Source project leaders declaring that they intend to block PewDiePie fans from using Linux — because PewDiePie fans are, according to Open Source Leftists, “fascists”. Just plain weird.

And, of course, the saga of Adobe working to silence The Lunduke Journal continues to march forward.

As usual, most of these stories were not only broken by The Lunduke Journal… but most Tech News outlets have refused to cover them at all.

Highlights from the last week (ending Sunday, May 4th, 2025):

Those links are all to X — but you can also find all of these shows on every other platform where The Lunduke Journal is available (including Rumble, Podcast, YouTube, and the rest).

Reminder: The Lunduke Journal refuses to take any funding from Big Tech. This type of reporting is only possible through the support of all of you. There are a number of ways you can help out — and, big or small, every option goes directly towards funding this work.

Without your support, so many stories about Big Tech and Woke Tech would never get told.

Seriously. You make The Lunduke Journal possible.

Thank you.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals