Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Mozilla Sued for Discrimination by Former CEO-To-Be
The story this lawsuit tells is a Game of Thrones style power struggle.
June 18, 2024
post photo preview

The Lunduke Journal has obtained the legal documents regarding a new lawsuit which has been filed against Mozilla, makers of Firefox, by a former C-Level executive.

And parts of it read like a Game of Thrones style power struggle within the browser maker.

  • The Mozilla Chief Product Officer was being groomed to take over as the new CEO.
  • That CEO-to-be took some medical leave to treat cancer.
  • In the days (literally) before the CEO-to-be returns from medical leave... the then-serving CEO of Mozilla, Mitchell Baker was fired -- by the Mozilla Board -- abruptly.  No warning.
  • The Mozilla Board of Directors then installed one of their own Board Members, Laura Chambers, as the new CEO.
  • All before that "CEO-to-be" could return to work, from his medical leave, and take over the CEO position.

There is a lot here -- including a tale of discrimination and abuse inside the Mozilla Corporation.

Below are screenshots of large portions of this lawsuit -- the items of particular interest to tell this story -- with each screenshot followed by a brief description and some additional details.  (If you're short on time, just read the descriptions between each screenshot... that will give you a high level overview of this story.)

 

Lawsuit: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

The lawsuit was filed by Steve Teixeria (the former Chief Product Officer of Mozilla), against Mozilla Corporation, in King County, Washington (Seattle), on June 12th, 2024.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Teixeira, the new Chief Product Officer (CPO) of Mozilla was brought on board in 2022 and was being groomed to become the new CEO (to replace Mitchell Baker).  This appeared to be the plan from Baker and at least one Mozilla Board Member.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

As CPO, Teixeira led roughly 75% of the employees of Mozilla, and oversaw the "entire commercial product portfolio".

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Firefox is reaffirmed to be roughly 90% of Mozilla's revenue.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

As CPO, Teixeira, was given high performance reviews.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Mozilla opened an entire office branch -- in Seattle, WA -- to accommodate Teixeira.  Which would make sense if the plan was to make Teixeira the new CEO.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Through September of 2023, the plan remained to transition Teixeira to become the CEO of Mozilla.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Teixeira was diagnosed with cancer (ocular melanoma) in October of 2023.  He then took leave (under the Family Medical Leave Act) until February of 2024.  Mitchell Baker remained CEO during that time... until the days before Teixeira returned to work.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Mozilla publicly announced their new CEO, Laura Chambers, on February 8th, 2024.

According to this legal filing, that decision was made (by the Mozilla Board), internally, roughly a week prior.  This would be "shortly before Mr. Teixeira" returned from leave on February 1st, 2024.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

This legal filing appears to say that Mitchell Baker was fired, by the Mozilla Board of Directors -- from her role as the CEO of Mozilla due to her "declining performance".

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

The timing here is interesting.

According to the legal filing, the firing of Mitchell Baker as Mozilla CEO was "so abrupt that they did not conduct a search for a successor".

Meaning: They were in a hurry.  For whatever reason, the Mozilla Board needed to act right then.

And the Mozilla Board -- which included Laura Chambers -- voted to install Laura Chambers as the new CEO.

All of this happened the very moment the person who was being groomed to take over as CEO, Teixeira, returned from his medical leave -- and was set to resume overseeing roughly 75% of Mozilla.

Was this the motivation for moving so quickly to install a new CEO?  To do so prior to Teixeira returning and taking over?

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

The first day back as CPO, Teixeira was instructed to lay off 50 (already selected) employees.  He had questions about who had been selected to be laid off.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Teixeira's employees were "explicitly forbidden", by the "Chief People Officer" of Mozilla (Dani Chehak), from briefing and assisting Teixeira as he returned from leave.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Teixeira expressed concerns, with Human Resources at Mozilla, that these layoffs would "disproportionately impact" "female leaders" and "persons of color".

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Teixeira was threatened, by the Chief People Officer (Chehak) to be forcibly placed "back on medical leave" if he "did not execute the layoffs as instructed".

Do what we say, fire these exact people, and don't talk to anyone about it.  Or get out.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

The new CEO, Laura Chambers, and the Chief People Officer, Chehak, insisted that Teixeira not only announce the layoffs... but falsely take responsibility for the layoff decision-making.

According to this document, Laura Chambers was throwing the person that was being groomed to be the CEO under the bus.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Teixeira was "permitted only to speak with the CEO and her direct reports".  His staff -- roughly 75% of Mozilla - was delayed being moved back under his leadership.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

There was an "outside audit" done of Mozilla's performance in "providing a diverse, equitable, and inclusive workplace culture" by Tiangay Kemokai Law, P.C..

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

According to that outside report, Mozilla's leadership provides an "inadequate response to the needs of a diverse culture" and is "incongruent with [Mozilla's] stated values and goals."

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Teixeira's former direct reports expressed, to him, "deep concerns" about leadership in his absence.  Specifically regarding "abrupt changes to strategy" and "inappropriate or abusive interactions" from the Senior VP of Strategy Operations (Suba Vasudevan) and the Chief Marketing Officer (Lindsey O'Brien).

This included complaints made to Human Resources regarding the Chief Marketing Officer.

What those complaints were, we do not know.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

The new CEO, Laura Chambers, hired a consultant to assume Teixeira's core responsibilities after Teixeira returned from medical leave.

Teixeira then received, from the newly installed CEO, his first negative performance review.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Teixeira -- once groomed to be the new CEO -- now was being forced to move into a new role. Which he did not want or ask for.

At this time he was able to work full time and did not request time off for medical care.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Teixeira's family believed that Mozilla was gathering his publicly available medical information, to be used against him in his employment.  His family then begins to remove public information regarding his medical status.

Teixeira disclosed to the new CEO (Laura Chambers) that liver cancer had been detected.

That information was then shared -- according to other statements within the lawsuit, by Laura Chambers -- with all of her direct reports.  

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Mozilla then makes it clear they wished to demote Teixeira (from a C-level executive down to a Vice President role).

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Teixeira declined the demotion (which would come with a 40% pay cut and the job would end, entirely, at the end of the year).

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Mozilla's CEO, Laura Chambers, then disclosed significant, private details of Teixeira's medical conditions to other Mozilla employees.  Without Teixeira's consent.

Chambers also told other Mozilla employees that Teixeira would be demoted (the demotion that he had just rejected).

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

A key note here: Teixeira had "not requested additional flexibility related to his disability."

On April 25th, Teixeira made a complaint, in writing, that he had been discriminated against because of his cancer.  Two days later, on April 27th, the CEO (Laura Chambers), "retaliated against Mr. Teixeira" by telling him, in a nutshell, to "take the demotion or you're fired."

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Mozilla, over the next couple days, began panicking -- instructing Teixeira not to discuss anything related to his employment with Mozilla... with anyone.  Even going so far as to draft up a new "non-disparagement and non-disclosure" document with new restrictions.

By the next week Teixeir was placed on "administrative leave".  His direct reports all reassigned to other executives.  His chief of staff fired.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Mozilla refused to provide a reason for these actions.

Mozilla then cut off Teixeira's access to all Mozilla systems (including email and messaging) -- and instructed Mozilla employees to "not communicate with Mr. Teixeira."

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

A few weeks later an "investigation" was launched into Teixeira's discrimination allegations.  However Teixeira was never contacted to participate in the investigation.  Which is strange, to say the least.

Normally an "investigation" involves all parties involved.

It would be very interesting to see the full results of that "investigation".

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Mozilla continued to falsely state that Teixeira was on "medical leave", and provided Teixeira's medical details to other employees without his consent.

Which, if true, means Mozilla is likely going to be anxious to settle this lawsuit out of court.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

This resulted in multiple Mozilla employees being led to believe that Teixeira "would pass away imminently" -- which, obviously, would be pretty distressing for both the remaining Mozilla employees and Teixeira and his family.

 

Source: Steve Teixeira vs Mozilla Corporation (et al), June 12th, 2024

 

Based on the details of this lawsuit -- should the details all prove accurate -- it certainly doesn't paint Mozilla in a good light.

  • A CEO ousted -- abruptly -- in the moments before a "New CEO-To-Be" returned to work and could take over?
  • The Mozilla Board acting with lightning speed to install one of their own into the CEO position?
  • Silencing.  Scapegoating.  Discrimination.  Abuse.

Raises many, many questions about what has been going on within Mozilla... and how specific individuals rose to power within the organization.

This document, of course, is merely one side of the story.

Should this case move to trial, we would hear Mozilla's side of the story.  That, however, seems unlikely... as these sorts of cases -- especially when they appear this strong -- tend to be settled pre-trial.

The Lunduke Journal has reached out to to both Mozilla and Teixeira for comment.  As this is an ongoing lawsuit -- and Mozilla has a strong track record of silence and secrecy -- no response is expected.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
24
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Lunduke's Week in Tech - Aug 23, 2025

USA Owns Intel & Microsoft's Intifada Problem (Plus: UK Says Email Causes Drought)

The Article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/lundukes-week-in-tech-aug-23-2025

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:39:03
Microsoft "Intifada" Shut Down After 4 Hours

Note: This video is being made free for all due to the nature of the news story. While all Audio Podcasts and Articles from The Lunduke Journal are always free, many videos are exclusive for subscribers. More details, and links, at Lunduke.com.

After the "Worker Intifada" declared they would occupy Microsoft Campus "as long as it takes" for Microsoft to cut ties with "the murderous Zionists", the event barely lasted past lunch.

The Article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/worker-intifada-occupies-microsoft

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:34:11
Lunduke's Week in Tech - August 15th, 2025

Linux Kernel Chaos & The Non-Woke Software List

The Article: https://lunduke.substack.com/p/lundukes-week-in-tech-aug-15-2026

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:45:49
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
post photo preview

“Selectramatronics”.

(By the way - minor spoiler for the ending - is there anything more eerie and yet oddly calming than the British shipping forecast?)

Funny Programming Pictures Part LXIX

Barely Any Effort Edition (tm)

https://lunduke.substack.com/p/funny-programming-pictures-part-lxix

post photo preview
post photo preview
Microsoft "Worker Intifada" says "Go Away, Jews!"
On the 3rd day of escalating events, the "Intifada" of Microsoft employees takes over a Redmond transit center, celebrates the murder of Jews, and chants (in Arabic), "Go Away, Jews!"

On Thursday, August 21st, the Microsoft “Worker Intifada” held their third event of the week — continuing their demands that Microsoft cut all ties with Israel, Israelis, and any company that does business in Israel.

This time, they ratcheted things up to officially include specific calls against all Jews.

Image
 

This third event of the week — following events on the 19th and 20th, which resulted in 18 arrests after the “Intifada” vandalized property, stole from a farmers market, and became aggressive — was scheduled at the transit station (and park & ride) next to Microsoft headquarters.

And scheduled to coincide with the evening rush hour.

Image
 

While some members of the “Intifada” had, at the previous events, shouted vulgarities and anti-Jewish statements (specifically anti-Jewish, not simply “anti-Israel”) at those walking by, this most recent event escalated the anti-Jewish messaging significantly.

With the entire crowd taking part in a chant — in Arabic — of “Jews, get out” or “Go away, Jews!”

 

The Microsoft “Intifada” event also made use of the “bloody red hand” symbolism — which specifically is celebrating the lynching of two Jews in 2000.

In that 2000 event, a Palestinian lynch mob gouged out eyes and disemboweled the Jews — with one Gazan holding up his hands, covered in the blood of the dead Jews, celebrating their murder.

Intifada Bloody hand pic
 

You can see the “bloody red hand” in this image, taken during the “Worker Intifada” event, next to the Microsoft logo — along with the statements “Microsoft powers genocide” and “Microsoft kills kids”.

 

The “Worker Intifada” has promised to escalate activities — including more violence and increasing speech “which cannot be ignored”.

 

Red paint (symbolizing blood) on Microsoft signs, fake “dead bodies”, screaming specifically anti-Jewish statements at people walking by, and getting aggressive with police.

And now the “Intifada” is adopting of imagery glorifying and encouraging the disemboweling of Jewish people — combined with loud, repeated, angry chants of “Jews get out!” — certainly seems like an escalation.

Importantly, this has quickly become not simply a political demonstration. These “Intifada” members are openly, proudly, and loudly advocating for the murder of their Jewish co-workers.

The Lunduke Journal reached out to the organizers of the Microsoft “Worker Intifada”, however they promptly stopped responding — and refused to answer any questions — once they noticed noticed the name of this publication.

The Lunduke Journal has also reached out to Microsoft for comment. As yet there has been no response.


The Lunduke Journal is the last bastion of truly independent Tech Journalism. Ad Free, Big Tech Free, Non-Woke, Audience Supported. Consider becoming a subscriber to support this vital work.

Read full Article
post photo preview
USA Now Owns 10% of Intel
The US Government is now the largest shareholder of Intel, the maker of CPUs with a secret, back-door operating system. What could possibly go wrong?

Yesterday, President Donald Trump announced that the United Stated federal government had acquired a 10% stake in Intel — making the USA the single largest shareholder.

Which raises a question: Considering the fact that Intel has implemented a secret operating system within their CPUs — a system which has total control and visibility of everything a computer does, and which computer users are not allowed access to — what are the implications of Intel now being owned, in large part, by a government?

How The Intel Deal Happened

On August 22nd, President Trump made a Truth Social post which read, “It is my Great Honor to report that the United States of America now fully owns and controls 10% of INTEL.”

Image
 

What’s especially fascinating is that, according to the President, “The United States paid nothing for these shares” worth approximately $11 Billion USD.

How, exactly did this all come to pass?

Well, the current CEO of Intel — a man named Lip-Bu Tan — is also the Chairman of an investment firm called Walden International. A position he continued to hold after becoming the new head of Intel.

Back on July 18th, the US Congress Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party wrote a letter expressing concern regarding Walden International’s investments in Chinese Communist Party tied corporations.

Image
 

But Intel CEO’s ties to China didn’t end there.

Lip-Bu Tan was also, previously, the CEO of Cadence Design Systems, which plead guilty to illegally selling chip design software and hardware to the Chinese Military.

Image
 

President Trump chimed in, on August 7th, stating that “The CEO of Intel is highly CONFLICTED and must resign immediately. There is no other solution to this problem.”

Image
 

Lip-Bu Tan sent out a letter to Intel employees, later that same day, addressing some of this — calling it “misinformation”, without providing any specifics or detailed rebuttals. He also referred to his leadership of “Walden” as a “past role”, even though his ties to Walden appear to remain.

4 days later, on August 11th, the Intel CEO met, in person, with President Trump. According to President Trump, during the meeting Trump suggested that Intel should “give” the US government 10% of Intel. And the Intel CEO replied that he would think about it.

On August 22nd, the deal was announced that it had been finalized.

Now there are, obviously, going to be many opinions about this. I have more than a few, myself. Let’s put aside some of the more political and financial concerns, for a moment, and focus in on a security & privacy issue.

The Intel Management Engine Issue

Almost every major Intel CPU, produced since 2008, ships with something called the “Intel Management Engine” (or “IME”, for short).

The IME is, to put it simply, a hidden computer inside your CPU. A hidden computer which has access to everything on your computer (absolutely everything) — but which you are not allowed any access to yourself.

A hidden computer… which even has a full web server.

Now, ask yourself, why would a secret computer — hidden inside your computer, spying on everything you do — need a web server? The answer is not a comforting one.

The IME is one of the most powerful, non-auditable, and widespread backdoors ever created. And it is in just about every Intel-powered computer on Earth. Even Google is concerned about the IME — going to drastic measures to disable it on their servers whenever possible.

And now the US federal government is the single largest shareholder of Intel.

The way I see it, the results of government ownership of Intel could impact the Intel Management Engine in one of two ways:

  • The Good: The government could provide oversight into potential, or already existing, abuses of the IME which may be impacting the security and privacy of US citizens, government agencies, and corporations. The government could even force Intel to remove the IME entirely. A massive win for computer security and privacy.

  • The Bad: The government could take advantage (or further advantage) of the IME for their own purposes. Possibly even expanding the IME’s already extensive surveillance capabilities.

Now, I don’t know about you, but my gut tells me the bad option is far more likely than the good one.

Even if that is not the intention of President Trump in making this deal… Someone, somewhere within the federal government is already planning ways which the IME can be used (or used further), in ways which we, as citizens, will not like.

But, and this is important, the US government is not the only organization with control over Intel.

The Other Big Players

While this 10% stake makes the USA the single largest shareholder of Intel, both Blackrock and Vanguard come in at a close second (both with close to 9% of the shares).

 

In fact, the top 4 shareholders of Intel now have a combined ownership of roughly 1/3rd of the entire company — that’s a lot of control.

Plus, most of those investment firms holding significant portions of several other computer companies. BlackRock, for example, also owns massive, influential stakes in Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, Amazon, and Google.

 

The control which these firms can wield over the computer industry is absolutely staggering.

Now that the US federal government is an even larger shareholder — at least with Intel — it will be interesting to see what impact that has on both the existing investment firms… and the actions of the corporations themselves.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Lunduke's Week in Tech - Aug 23, 2025
USA Owns Intel & Microsoft's Intifada Problem (Plus: UK Says Email Causes Drought)

Another week, another round of absolutely insane stories within the Tech Industry. The “USA becomes the majority shareholder of Intel” and “Microsoft Intifada” stories really jump out at me as the most wild of the week.

But, shoot, the “UK says Email causes drought” story was pretty nuts too. They’re all below.

And next week is already shaping up to be even crazier. We’re expecting the final ruling in the remedy phase of “USA v. Google” next week. Plus a few other stories that have been percolating.

I do believe a statement of “Buckle up, Buttercup” is in order.

USA Owns 10% of Intel

This story broke at the very end of the week and, I tell ya, I did not have “US Government is given 10% of Intel stock, making it the largest shareholder, without even paying for it” on my 2025 Bingo card.

Crazy. With some potentially wild consequences. This story requires a lot more digging. I’m checking in with a few Intel sources to get the inside scoop.

The Microsoft “Intifada”

This one really hits deep into the non-Tech political news. But it is all about Microsoft and Microsoft employees — with a potential boil over to other parts of the Tech industry — so it definitely deserves to be covered here.

A group of Microsoft employees have declared themselves the “Microsoft Worker Intifada” and are vowing to make life hard for Microsoft, with escalating events, until Microsoft cuts all ties with Israel.

Their first event, on Tuesday, was a bit of a dud (Article, Podcast & Video). They occupied a Microsoft Main Campus plaza, made a bit of a mess, then quickly folded at the first sign that they might face arrest.

But their second event, on Wednesday (at the same location on Microsoft campus), turned very ugly (Article). 18 arrests. Massive vandalism. Fake blood (red paint) and fake dead bodies. They ransacked a farmers market to steal material to build a barricade, got rowdy, and made a point of shouting anti-Jewish slurs at people walking by.

And their third event, on Thursday, went even further with the anti-Jewish stuff (Article). Posters celebrating the murder and disemboweling of Jews. Repeated chants, in Arabic, of “Go away, Jews!”. This wasn’t an event protesting political policies of a country. This was a wide-ranging event focused on attacking and opposing anything “Jewish” — including Jewish Microsoft employees. No arrests at the third event.

It remains to be seen what actions Microsoft will take regarding all of this. Obviously, I’ve asked. But radio silence from them.

Other Stories This Week

There were some other pretty insane stories this week.

Note: All articles and podcasts are free for all (subscribers and non-subscribers alike).

Note 2: Links for the stories are all to Substack. You can also find links to all other platforms, which The Lunduke Journal publishes to, at Lunduke.com.

Note 3: Most videos are subscriber exclusives. Subscribers on Locals, Substack, X, YouTube, or Patreon can watch all of the videos. Ad free. If you don’t have a subscription yet, you can snag one for 50% off through the end of August.

As always, thank you to all of the subscribers to The Lunduke Journal. Thanks to you, we can remain 100% ad-free and Big Tech free. Couldn’t do it without your support.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals