Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
The GNOME 5 Year plan: Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, & Nonexistent PowerPoint Slides
This is what the GNOME Foundation has been working on, in secret, for the last 6 months?
May 30, 2024
post photo preview

The GNOME Foundation -- the organization behind the Desktop Environment used by nearly every Enterprise Linux company -- has had a pretty wild ride as of late.

First they hired a new Executive Director, who was previously a "Professional Shaman" (a fact they immediately worked to hide... which was... you know... weird).  Then it becomes clear that they were in incredibly dire financial straits and needed to implement an emergency spending freeze.

No ifs, ands, or buts about it, the GNOME Foundation is having a rough go of it.

But, fear not!  For the GNOME Foundation's Board of Directors has announced a draft of a glorioius "Five Year Strategic Plan", painstakingly designed to solve their financial woes and get GNOME back on the right track.

From their announcement:

"This draft was created over a six-month period through a process that involved research, individual interviews, and group discussions with staff, board, and members. This draft has been reviewed by the Board and is now ready to share with the greater community."

That's right.  This plan took six months to create.  Six.  Months.  Making it, assuredly, the most well researched, detailed, comprehensive plan in the history of Open Source Software!

Prepare to be Disappointed

I'll jump right to the point:  This plan is neither detailed nor comprehensive.  It is not a "took 6 months" plan... heck... it's not even a "took 6 hours" plan.  It is, in fact, vague, poorly thought out, filled with DEI buzz words, and heavily reliant on wishy thinking.

The best thing I can say about this plan is that it is, thankfully, extremely short.

The GNOME Five Year Strategic Plan consists of just over 1,000 words and is broken up into three "Strategic Goals" sections:

  1. People
  2. Initiatives
  3. Capacity & Infrastructure

Let's go through the primary points of each section, shall we?  I mean... it's short!  So it won't take long!

(Note: The summarized points below are only slightly summarized, mostly to remove flowery, vague language... the entire, complete Five Year Strategic Plan contains very few additional details whatsoever.)

Goal One: People

Here we go.  One bullet point at a time.  With commentary and analysis on each.

  • Take the voting board from seven to eleven members.

Ok.  There are 7 board members.  They want to add 4 more.  Now there will be 11.  How will that help GNOME?  Who knows.  But it's worth noting.  Because it's one of the few times, in this whole plan, where actual numbers are mentioned.

  • Create a more inclusive leadership model prioritizing advancing women, people of color, people from under-represented regions, and people with disabilities to positions of leadership.

Ah.  Here we go.  Right out of the gate.  "Prioritizing" specific groups over others.  Also known as discrimination.

How, exactly, does discriminating against some groups -- while falsely claiming "inclusivity" -- bring in additional funds (which GNOME desperately needs to stay operational)?  Beats me!

  • Communicate the social-benefit of GNOME by describing how GNOME directly empowers people, including under-served people.

Who, exactly, are these "under-served people"?  Under-served... of what?  Spaghetti?  Have they been served too small a portion of spaghetti?

That's a joke.  We know it's not referring to spaghetti.  Or do we?  This plan doesn't say what they're talking about at all.  It might as well be all about spaghetti!

And what would the "social-benefit" be?  You know... exactly.  This plan doesn't say.  Because that would be specific.  And this plan is anything but specific.  Or useful.

  • Activate more diverse, under-served, female, transgender, and younger users and creators.

"Hey, how can we bring in a ton more money -- to bring our software development foundation back from the brink of bankruptcy?"

"Hmm.  I dunno!  Maybe say something about diversity?  Oh!  Throw in the word 'transgender'!  That oughta do it!"

  • Create GNOME Pathways Initiative (“Pathways”), an education program that recruits, mentors, educates, involves, and elevates as leaders new creators from Africa, Latin America, Asia.

Ok, here's an idea that actually has a little merit.  Recruit people, in various locales, to work on GNOME related projects.  Great.  Do that.  Why does this need to, specifically, be focused on "Africa, Latin America, and Asia"?  That's not made clear in the plan.  Maybe somebody really wants to take a trip to those areas?

It's also not clear how this would be done.  Or what sort of specific, measurable goals this would have.  Vague as vague can be.

But at least it's the beginning of a real idea.

  • Launch a badging program — “powered by GNOME”

Right about now, you might be thinking, "Wait... they've worked on this for half a year... and they only have vague concept of creating a 'badging program' but haven't come up with anything else about it?"

Yup.

  • Strategic partnerships with governments, universities, and nonprofit partners to reach new, under-served and diverse audiences.

Diverse!  Under-served!  Vague!  Huzzah!

Goal Two: Initiatives

  • Document all successes and impacts and incorporate all the new narrative into a refreshed GNOME Foundation website.

Ok.  This actually seems reasonable.  (Despite the structure of that sentence making my eyes bleed.)

Tell people all of the cool things GNOME has accomplished.  Makes sense!  That's the start of a marketing idea, right there!

... and it took the GNOME Foundation (and their new Executive Director) 6 months to simply come up with that idea.  Shoot.  Completing that entire task shouldn't take more than a small fraction of those "6 months".

What, exactly, has the GNOME Executive Director been doing for the last half year?  

  • Integrate fiscal sponsorship for Flathub apps and GNOME Circle apps

Integrate... fiscal sponsorship... for Flathub apps.

Huh.  Ok.  So... finding companies, or organizations, to become sponsors (read: advertisers) within software distributed via Flathub?  Well.  That's one possible way to raise funds.

Putting ads and sponsorships into software, though.  That sounds very... Microsoft-y.

  • Identify current critical security weaknesses in GNOME and fix them.

Wait.  GNOME wasn't fixing security weaknesses already?

That... that can't be the case.  Right?

  • Create more documentation and tooling for GNOME as a whole; having these things will also fuel increased accessibility, diversity, equity, and inclusion for creators and users.

Diversity!  Equity!  Inclusion!

That'll definitely, magically, earn GNOME more money!

Wait.  Documentation = increased Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion?

But.  How?  What?  Trying to make sense of that is making my nose bleed.

  • Create a more strategic, more inclusive, less expensive, more worldwide, and greener annual event for GNOME.

Remember when you were having a conversation with that software developer friend of yours, and he said, "Gee.  I'd absolutely go to a GNOME conference... but they just aren't green or inclusive enough."?

But, hey, less expensive events!  That seems like a good thing!

  • Identify and market to new, outward-facing, under-served, and diverse audiences.

Oh, my gosh.  Seriously?  Again with the "under-served" and "diverse" mishegaas?

What in the heck does that mean, anyway?  So if a new, potential GNOME user (or developer) isn't in whatever "diverse" group the GNOME Foundation randomly defines in the moment (because it's not called out in the "plan")... GNOME doesn't want them around?

What a weird -- and stupid -- thing to include in a plan.

Goal Three: Capacity & Infrastructure

  • Document and claim in writing through a case for support and slide deck what we have already accomplished.

Read that sentence again.  Say it out loud.  Slowly.

Then remember that this sentence took 6 months to write.  And was reviewed by the GNOME Board before being published.

Also... they didn't take 6 months to make a slide deck.  They took 6 months to say "hey, we should make a slide deck some day".

  • Quantify our impact in numbers through charts and graphs

"Hey, you know what successful Foundations have?  Charts and graphs!  Based on numbers!  Let's come up with some of those!"

6 months to think of that... but not actually make any charts.  Or graphs.

  • Seek funding for GNOME Development

SixMonths.  Just to think of the 5 words that sum up the entire, obvious reason why their foundation existed in the first place. 

Seek funding for GNOME Development.

This is something that their Executive Director (and Board) should be doing.  Every day.  Constantly.

They just took half a year... to think about maybe doing it.

  • Two or three crowdfunding campaigns each year for hard-to-fund meta activities to raise between $50K and $200K per initiative.

Great!  How many crowdfunding campaigns has GNOME run in the last half year?  Oh.  Zero?  But they want to have two or three per year?  Better get busy.

Because, you know, GNOME is running out of money.  Chop chop!

  • Fundraise around becoming a Flathub sponsor; collect demographics for contributors in Github.

Wait.  Collect demographics for contributors in GitHub?  What in the heck does that mean, exactly?  And how are those collected personal demographic details monetized?

This feels like something that's going to get GNOME yelled at.

  • Develop direct funding relationships with at least twenty new foundations, at least 20 new corporate partners, and at least ten government agencies in 2024.

Ok.  Great.  Finally!  A goal with an actual, measurable set of numbers on it!

How much of this has been accomplished in the last half year?  Was it just thought about... or was it acted upon?

Will details on this be published so GNOME members and contributors can see how the Executive Director and Board are performing against these goals?

  • Increase staff capacity by hiring (multiple new positions).

So... spend more money.  Money GNOME does not have. 

But will definitely have soon.  Wink wink.  Because of this totally sweet "Five Year Strategic Plan".  Also... diversity.

That's it.  Really.

And that brings us to the end of a complete analysis of nearly every point of this... ahem... plan.

A plan with an almost startling lack of details.

A plan primarily focused on repeating words like "diverse", "under-served", and "inclusive"... with very little focus on an actual strategy for keeping the GNOME Foundation afloat.

A plan that could have been written in a short afternoon.  During commercial breaks while watching reruns of Scooby Doo.

In fact... this article contains more words than the entire "GNOME Five Year Strategic Plan".  Seriously.

And, yes.  I wrote this during commercial breaks... while watching reruns of Scooby Doo.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
14
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Groupthink, Tech Journalism, & The Lunduke Journal

Why The Lunduke Journal uses the "10th Man Rule" to counter groupthink in the Tech Industry. (And why you'll definitely disagree with Lunduke sometimes.)

Stick it to Big Tech, 50% off everything at The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/stick-it-to-big-tech-50-off-everything

00:18:10
The Age of Non-Woke Open Source is Beginning

Non-Woke "Political Protest Forks" like XLibre & Redot are thriving. Non-DEl Linux Distributions like Open Mandriva are as well. But Woke projects? Not doing so well.

The Article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-political-protest-forks

00:21:04
Ladybird Proves You CAN Just Build a New Web Browser

The Google / Mozilla stooges said, "It can't be done!". Ladybird said, "Hold my beer."

The Article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/ladybird-proves-you-can-just-build

00:09:58
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

Finally got around to doing the official article on the mid-2010 iMac upgrades I'd previously discussed here. Enjoy!

https://retropunk.substack.com/p/lets-upgrade-a-2010-imac

Stick it to Big Tech, 50% off everything at The Lunduke Journal

What The Lunduke Journal does is unique among Tech Journalists.

Because of you, The Lunduke Journal has been able to shine a light on the shady practices of Big Tech corporations and Tech Foundations alike. Been able to publish massive leaks from whistleblowers and do real, deep, investigative journalism on everything from Open Source projects to the biggest Big Tech firms.

Stories which have had a real, measurable impact on the world of Tech and Computing. (And, of course, we’ve had a little nerdy fun along the way.)

If those organizations had their way, The Lunduke Journal would be wiped off the face of the Earth.

But, luckily, they don’t have that power. Thanks to you.

To every one of you who grabs a new subscription this week — and those who have already subscribed — I owe you a high five.

https://lunduke.substack.com/p/stick-it-to-big-tech-50-off-everything

2 hours ago

After trying to get a simple server up and running...
None of the popular ones worked worth a dang...
So I went to distrowatch and did an advanced search for server software and lo and behold none of those popular ones showed up!! Hmmmm...
Here's what was offered:
adelie-live-xfce-x86_64-1.0-beta6-20241223.iso
chimera-linux-x86_64-LIVE-20250420-base.iso
chimera-linux-x86_64-LIVE-20250420-gnome.iso
chimera-linux-x86_64-LIVE-20250420-plasma.iso
Linux_Kamarada-15.6-x86_64-Build9.1.iso
Macaroni-Phoenix-Xfce-Mark-25.06.iso
openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20250627.x86_64.iso
Pardus-23.4-XFCE-amd64.iso
ploplinux-25.2-x86_64.iso
zentyal-8.0-development-amd64.iso

So, I will be testing these to see how they play out...
My testing regimen is simple...
They have to work...it's surprising how much of the popular ones don't actually work!!
I have to be able to tweak the different server parts like ftp, etc. Again it's amazing how many of the popular ones don't!!
I must be able to log in the server from...

post photo preview
Open Source “Political Protest Forks” Thriving
Many called XLibre & Redot nothing more than “political protests” that would quickly die and be forgotten. Boy were those naysayers wrong.

Over the last year, we’ve seen a couple of high profile forks, of large Open Source projects, which were inspired — in part — by a desire to move away from the political discrimination and Leftist Extremism within the original projects.

At the time, when each of these forked projects were started, many predicted that they would go nowhere. That they were nothing more than “political protest forks” — and they would die out quickly.

Let’s check in on both of those project to see if that has happened.

XLibre - The Xorg Fork

Since officially launching, at the end of June (last month), the XLibre project has published a handful of official releases (now up to version 25.0.0.5)… with a significant number of changes and fixes.

 

In fact, considering the significant new features (such as XNamespace Extensions), the first release of XLibre is larger (in every way I can think to measure) than any Xorg release in the last decade. With the number of contributors growing.

How about Operating System support? Many predicted that XLibre would be ignored by every Linux distribution on the planet. That it would go nowhere and nobody would use it.

According to the “Are we XLibre yet?” wiki, a number of systems have already (officially) adopted XLibre. Including: Devuan, Artix, GhostBSD, and (my personal favorite) OpenMandriva.

 

This is important to note: All of that support has occurred even though XLibre has only existed for one month. Several systems already officially supporting it is nothing short of “crazy impressive”. Borderline unprecedented.

In addition, a number of systems have 3rd party repositories which allow users to install and use XLibre. Including: Arch, FreeBSD, Gentoo, NixOS, Slackware, and (seriously) macOS.

 

In short: Growing group of developers. Rapidly growing platform support. New releases which put the original project (Xorg) to shame.

Redot - The Godot Game Engine Fork

The Redot project — which forked off of Godot back in October of 2024 — had a stable release (4.3.1) back in June, and just had a new test release (4.4 Alpha 2). Both with both new features and fixes.

 

In fact, Redot has had 13 releases since the project started late last year.

With an absolutely massive number of commits since then.

 

In short: Steady, new releases. New features and bug fixes. Both stable and testing releases.

These Projects are Thriving

It’s hard to look at either of these projects and come to any conclusion other than they are absolutely thriving.

At this point, it’s looking like those who predicted rapid failure for these “Political Forks” were not only wrong… but wildly, obscenely wrong.

There’s a lesson in there.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Groupthink & Tech Journalism
Why The Lunduke Journal uses the “10th Man Rule” to counter groupthink in the Tech Industry.

If my audience always agrees with me — 100% of the time — I’m probably doing something wrong.

That’s core to the ethos of The Lunduke Journal.

Any Brand X Tech Journalist can publish articles and shows filled with ideas, and facts, which their audience is known to already approve of. It’s easy to play it safe. To tell people — and corporations — what they want to hear. To pander.

We have enough Tech Journalists who do exactly that. Heck, we’re lousy with ‘em.

Put another way: The Lunduke Journal is not here to make friends. Not here to win some “Tech Reporter Popularity Contest”(tm).

Why The Lunduke Journal Exists

The Lunduke Journal exists to tell the truth about the Tech Industry (and world of Computing) — as I see it — no matter what. To tell the stories the other Tech Journalists are terrified of touching, for fear of losing that afore mentioned popularity contest.

The Lunduke Journal publishes leaks from major corporations — royally ticking off all of Big Tech in the process.

The Lunduke Journal shines a light on the discriminatory, DEI, & woke practices of Tech — causing nearly every Tech Industry person, with a Left-leaning political stance, to label me enemy number one (often attacking me, with wildly vulgar statements, in a desperate attempt to discredit me).

The Lunduke Journal investigates the shady business practices of Open Source Foundations and organizations — resulting in nearly every leader within the Free and Open Source world to either fear or despise me (often both).

In fact, The Lunduke Journal publishes stories — ranging from investigative pieces to pure opinion and analysis — which will, undoubtedly, infuriate (or at least annoy) every single nerd on this green Earth of ours.

Prefer Linux, Windows, or Mac? Left, Center, or Right politically? Pro or Anti-Government control over Tech? Star Wars or Star Trek?

Never fear. There will surely be a Lunduke Journal story which you will strongly disagree with. Just give it a little time.

Let me tell you why.

The Tenth Man Principle

Groupthink can be a very dangerous thing. Especially when you already agree with the consensus of the group.

There is a concept where, if 9 men all agree on something — an idea, a fact, a strategy — it is the duty of the 10th man to take a different approach. To pursue a contrary idea or strategy.

In some ways this is a variation on “Playing Devil’s Advocate”, but I prefer the “10th Man Principle” — it is more focused on challenging an entrenched consensus.

Which is where The Lunduke Journal comes in.

When I sit down and read Tech News — and listen to Tech Podcasts or Videos — and 90% of the coverage is all repeating the same position… whenever an extreme consensus has been reached… a red flag is raised. The 10th Man Principle is triggered.

My job is then to take whatever that topic is — a piece of breaking Tech news, a historical fact, an opinion on how Tech should be governed, etc. — and spin it around. Look at it from a completely different angle — and pursue that new line of thinking.

This isn’t about simply being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian.

I must investigate that topic rigorously. Focus on known, verifiable facts. Challenge any assumptions made (by myself or others) in whatever that consensus is. Dig deep. Dig where others have not. See where that investigation leads.

Sometimes that investigation leads to nothing overly interesting or worth publishing. Other times… the results are illuminating and profoundly valuable.

If you’ve followed The Lunduke Journal for any length of time, you’ve seen the results of this ethos. Over and over again.

And I Love It

There are, obviously, some challenges with this approach. To put it mildly.

Corporate sponsorship is — for reasons I clearly do not need to explain — impossible.

Luckily, The Lunduke Journal has an amazing (and generous) audience which keeps the lights on, making corporate sponsorship completely unnecessary. So Big Tech can kiss my tuchus.

On that note, getting employees of any Corporation or Foundation to talk “on the record” is simply not going to happen. In fact, many organizations have firm (and, often, stated) policies of “Don’t talk to Lunduke… ever”.

But, you know what? The brave whistleblowers within those companies have proven far more enlightening than any official statement from an executive could hope to be.

Oh, and that “Tech Journalism Popularity Contest”(tm)? Pshht. Forget about it. Not a chance. Not as long as I continue with the “10th Man Principle”.

If I’m doing my job right, the list of people who consider me an enemy of whatever entrenched, consensus position they hold… will continue to grow.

While, at the same time, the rag-tag group of Lunduke Journal supporters — those amazing nerds who see the need for this work (even though, on occasion, I publish something which challenges one of their deeply held convictions… or, perhaps, because of it) — will also continue to grow.

You know what? I wouldn’t have it any other way.

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Tea App Breach - 60GB of Personal Info
Selfies, Drivers Licenses, & Locations. All made publicly available by the developer.

The “Tea App” — an online dating app marketed as a dating tool that “protects women” — has been hacked. And a lot of data has been exposed. An extreme amount.

Not the first major breach this year. And it certainly won’t be the last.

 

First published over on 4Chan (of course), the “hack” of Tea App wasn’t even really much of a “hack”. The developers of Tea App apparently simply left the user data open for the world to download at their leisure.

And Tea App was becoming pretty popular — which means roughly 60 GB of user data was made available before the developers finally thought about locking things down.

 

What kind of data was made publicly available — because, presumably, the developers simply didn’t think about “security” much — by this Tea App Hack?

Selfies. Drivers licenses. All manner of private information which will, no doubt, be exploited by unscrupulous types over the days to come.

 

Even worse — meta data appears to have been preserved on uploaded photos. Meaning that many of the user selfies included location data (in addition to the address on the drivers license). Which said unscrupulous types have already begun using to create maps of Tea App users.

 

The developers of Tea App have put out a statement which says 59,000 images used for “account verification” were made available (read: Government ID). Which would already be catastrophic… however a quick look at details of the data (including the file size alone) would suggest that number could be much, much larger.

Here is the full statement from the developer:

 

Which brings us to an important lesson which we — as humans — never seem to learn:

If user data is stored, it will get hacked.

It’s simply a matter of time.

There are currently close to 15 Billion (with a B) accounts listed on Have I Been Pwned. And those are simply from hacks and breaches which were reported to that one website.

 

The reality is, the vast majority of hacks and data breaches are never made publicly known. Either by the people doing the hacking, or by the company / government which got hacked.

As systems continue to grow ever more complex and interconnected — and more systems become AI-developed (aka “Vibe Coded”) — these hacks and breaches become easier to pull off.

Combine that with the ever-expanding quantity of data — and the growing number of services storing it — and we are quickly reaching a point where everyone will have at least some of their data breached at some point. For some people it will happen regularly. Repeatedly.

And those will just be the breaches we find out about.

The only way to minimize the damage of such hacks & breaches is to minimize the amount and type of data stored, long term, by a service.

  • Need pictures of government ID for age verification? Delete that picture immediately after verification.

  • Need payment and shipping information? Delete all of it immediately after payment is processed and shipment is verified.

  • Need location data (GPS, IP, etc.)? Delete it immediately once done with it.

You get the point. Unless a piece of personal data is absolutely 100% necessary, delete it.

It’s hard for a hacker to obtain files… that aren’t there.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals