Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Who (really) created the "Byte"?
And what is the REAL definition of term?
May 06, 2024
post photo preview

Kilobytes (KB). Megabytes (MB). Gigabytes (GB).

We use these storage measurements every single, gosh-darned day. And most of us feel like we know exactly what they mean. But do we really?

Do we really — truly — know what a “Byte” is… and its origin? I mean… who came up with the term “Byte”, anyway?

Let’s take a moment to look over the history of the term. If, for no other reason, than to feel smarter than most other nerds.

What is a “Byte”?

If you ask Mr. Google, a Byte is exactly 8 Bits.

Mr. Google wouldn't lie... right?

Ok. Great. 8 Bits = 1 Byte.

So what is a Bit?

That part is simple.

A Bit is the smallest unit of information for a digital computer. A Bit can have two possible values… 0 or 1. It is a boolean. A binary.

Many people believe “Bit” is short for “Bite”. You find this in many computer history books. This little tidbit has been repeated so often, many believe it. However, like many such oft-repeated anecdotes in computing… it’s hogwash.

In fact, “Bit” is an acronym for “Binary Information Digit”. Squish that phrase together and you get “Bit”.

Fun factoids about the origin of the “Bit”

The first usage of the word “bit”, when talking about a type of data in reference to computing, was by Vannevar Bush. He published an articled entitled “Instrumental Analysis” in the October, 1936 issue of “American Mathematical Society”. In it he used the phrase “bits of information” when talking about punch cards.

However 

“Bit” was commonly used in Middle English to refer to “a mouthful” or a “morsel” of food. (This is the origin of why many believe “Bit” is short for “Bite”… even though it isn’t.) As such, Vannevar Bush may not have actually been thinking about a “Bit” as a “Binary digit”… instead he may simply have thought “this is a morsel of data”. Also worth noting… Bush never actually defines what a “bit” is. Making it likely that he was simply using the word “bit” in the Middle English way.

The first — distinctly verifiable — usage of “Bit” in this way is by John Tukey. From “A Mathematical Theory of Communication” written by C. E. Shannon in 1949:

“The choice of a logarithmic base corresponds to the choice of a unit for measuring information. If the base 2 is used the resulting units may be called binary digits, or more briefly bits, a word suggested by J. W. Tukey. A device with two stable positions, such as a relay or a flip-flop circuit, can store one bit of information.”

There you have it. More information about the origin of the term “bit” than you ever wanted to know.

You’re welcome.

Ok. Great.

So, in short, a Bit is a 0 or 1. And a Byte is a group of 8 Bits. Easy.

Not so fast there, sport!

While the Byte being 8 Bits is commonly accepted today… that was not always the case. Not by a long shot!

In fact, there are two competing stories for who created the term “Byte”… and neither of them were referring to a set of 8 Bits!

Seriously!

Werner Buchholz’s 6 Bits

The most often cited creator of the term “Byte” is Werner Buchholz — who used the term, in 1956, to refer to a grouping of 6 Bits when working on the IBM Stretch Super computer.

Man sitting at IBM Stretch console. Image source: computer-history.info.

A “6 Bit” Byte was common in those days. In fact, Braille was a 6 Bit encoding of characters for the blind. And many of the early computers (from IBM and others) used 6 Bit groupings to encode character data.

6 Bits -- not 8 Bits -- per Byte.

However (you knew there had to be a “however”)…

Louis G. Dooley’s N Bits

Around that same time (1956 or so), Louis Dooley first used the word “Byte” to refer to an undefined grouping of “Bits”. But, typically, used as “4 Bits”.

That's right.  Not 8 Bits.  Not 6 Bits.  But 4 Bits.

Dooley published the following letter in BYTE magazine:

“I would like to get the following on record: The word byte was coined around 1956 to 1957 at MIT Lincoln Laboratories within a project called SAGE (the North American Air Defense System), which was jointly developed by Rand, Lincoln Labs, and IBM. In that era, computer memory structure was already defined in terms of word size. A word consisted of x number of bits; a bit represented a binary notational position in a word. Operations typically operated on all the bits in the full word.

 

We coined the word byte to refer to a logical set of bits less than a full word size. At that time, it was not defined specifically as x bits but typically referred to as a set of 4 bits, as that was the size of most of our coded data items. Shortly afterward, I went on to other responsibilities that removed me from SAGE. After having spent many years in Asia, I returned to the U.S. and was bemused to find out that the word byte was being used in the new microcomputer technology to refer to the basic addressable memory unit.

 

Louis G. Dooley
Ocala, FL”

So… what the heck is a “Byte”?!

That’s right. We now have two very, very different definitions for the word “Byte”. Both creations of the word happened independently… and at almost the exact same moment in time.

  • The Buchholz Byte” - A grouping of 6 Bits.
  • The Dooley Byte” - A grouping of an undefined number of bits, less than a full word size. Often used to describe 4 Bits.

You’ll note that neither of these definitions — from the men who created the term — have the number “8” in them.

The shift towards 8 Bits per Byte started to happen in the 1970s… with the development and gaining popularity of 8-Bit processors, such as the legendary Intel 8008.

A revision of the Intel 8008 CPU

Interestingly, some of those early 8-Bit CPU’s had specific functions for handling 4-Bit chunks of data. Because, up until that point, 4 and 6-Bit “Bytes” were incredibly common (including in the predecessor to the Intel 8008… the 4-Bit Intel 4004).

Fun Factoid: Nowadays a 4-Bit group is called a “Nibble”. Which is adorable.

For quite some time the term “octet” or “octad” was used to denote 8 Bit groups. At some point along the way, most people phased that out as well… simply referring to all “groups of bits” as a “Byte”. Though you will still find “octet” used here and there, especially when talking about various network protocols.

All of which means…

Dooley invented the modern “Byte”… not Buchholz

While many writers, enthusiasts, and computer historians are quick to say that Werner Buchholz coined the term “Byte”… they are obviously mistaken.

Besides the fact that it’s hard to discern who (Dooley or Buchholz) actually used the term first… the Buchholz definition is no longer used at all in modern computing.

The Buchholz definition is specific. 6 Bits. Which modern computing has determined is not the amount of Bits in a modern Byte.

The Dooley definition, on the other hand, allows for wiggle room. Which means that an 8 Bit “Byte” would fit the Dooley definition. But not the Buchholz.

The facts are clear: Louis G. Dooley created the word “Byte”. At least as it has been used for the last 40+ years.

But Buchholz — an absolute legend in the computing world — gets one heck of an Honorable Mention trophy.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
20
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Over 2,000 AI Generated Linux Kernel Patches in the Last 45 Days

The number of monthly Al / LLM generated code submissions to the Linux Kernel has increased by over 2,700% since February.

Massively Discounted Lifetime Subs Through June:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/50-off-yearly-and-massively-discounted

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:16:36
AI + Rust = More Backdoors

Have a goal of inserting undetected backdoors (and other exploits) into popular software? Rust & Al code generation are here to help.

50% Off Yearly, & Massively Discounted Lifetime Subs Through May 31:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/50-off-yearly-and-massively-discounted

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:16:05
Open Source Projects Banning AI, From QEMU to NetBSD

While the Linux Kernel is becoming "Vibe Coded", other Open Source projects are outright banning all Al / LLM contributions. Including Haiku, OBS, Zig, & more.

50% Off Yearly, & Massively Discounted Lifetime Subs Through May 31:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/50-off-yearly-and-massively-discounted

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:12:29
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
22 hours ago

Microsoft is limiting AI usage by engineers. The token cost surpassed the cost of the engineers. Why hire experienced workers if they aren't going to use their well honed skills?

Microsoft discovered boyh through cost and Windows 11 disasters that AI is currently a tool. It is not a replacement for engineers or architects. Maybe in 8 to 10 years, buy not today.

To illustrate this, the article offers this anecdote from Uber.

Uber’s experience illustrates exactly how quickly that can happen. The company deployed Claude Code to 5,000 engineers and watched monthly usage rates climb to 84-95% by April 2026. Per-engineer API costs reached between $500 and $2,000 per month. The result: Uber burned through its entire $3.4 billion 2026 AI budget in four months. Its CTO said the annual budget had already been exhausted before the year was half over, AI Magazine confirmed.

https://www.thestreet.com/technology/microsoft-ceo-sends-shocking-message-to-employees

For a long time, I have held the opinion:
If You Cannot Define a Problem - then Any Effective Solution Is Very Unlikely.
👨‍🔧
@leebase @Lunduke
I hoped for "Internet Searches" to give me some useful results, but most of what I saw was "Weak Sauce." Lately there have been observations of "Spent a $$$ Ton on A.I. Tokens but All I Got Was Mush."
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/7969331/microsoft-is-limiting-ai-usage-by-engineers-the-token-cost-surpassed-the-cost-of-the-engineers-why#comments

see "4. Why..." for the explanation on Disappointing A.I.
Therefore ... here's Grok: starting with - The quote you mentioned is often attributed to Albert Einstein (though the exact wording varies). It perfectly captures a fundamental truth in problem-solving, especially in technical fields.

1. "Defining the Problem" in Tech Support and DevOps

In both Tech Support and DevOps, problem definition is the highest-leverage activity.

Good Problem Definition includes:

  • What exactly is happening? (Symptoms, not assumptions)
  • **When and ...
13 hours ago

Is this possible???

The "Windows 1.0" Lunduke Lifetime Wall is here!

Two awesome tidbits:

  1. The 7th Lifetime Subscriber Wall (aka “The Solaris Wall”) is full! No room for any more names! You can see the final version on the bottom of Lunduke.com (and at the end of new shows).

  2. The 8th Lifetime Wall will make its debut on Monday! The retro computing platform chosen for Wall number 8 will be… Windows 1.0!

If you would like to see your name immortalized in a screenshot of the very first version of Windows, from 1985, displayed on both Lunduke.com & at the end of all Lunduke Journal shows (you know you do):

Support the Lunduke Journal… and, at the same time, have your name immortalized in a screenshot of the operating system with (arguably) the worst color scheme in human history.

It’s a win-win.

 

-Lunduke

Read full Article
post photo preview
Lifetime "Solaris" Wall almost full!

Just a quick heads up that the 7th “Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscriber Wall”, aka “The Solaris Wall”, is almost full!

The Solaris Wall has enough space for maybe 6 or 7 more names (depending on name length)… before we lock it down and move on to Wall Number 8 (which will be another retro computing platform).

Hard to say how long until the Solaris Wall is full… but no more than a few days. These things fill up fast.

First come, first served.

Huge thank you to every subscriber. The Lunduke Journal wouldn’t be possible without you. You rule.

-Lunduke

 
Read full Article
Last call for the "Amiga" Lifetime Subscriber Wall. It's almost full!

Holy smokes, that was fast.

The 6th Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscriber Wall (aka the “Amiga OS 3.1” Wall) was introduced… what… a week ago?

I kid you not, the darn thing is already almost full! I was wildly unprepared for how popular this would be!

There’s enough space left for maybe 5 or 6 more names. Tops. Then I’ve gotta declare “Wall 6 (Amiga) is Full” and start Wall Number 7!

Here’s what all of the Lifetime Subscriber Walls look like (each shown at the end of every Lunduke Journal video):

 

If you want to get onto the Lifetime Subscriber Wall (and have any chance of making it onto the Amiga Wall before it’s full) here’s what you need to do (and do it quickly):

  1. Grab a Lifetime Subscription to The Lunduke Journal (if you don’t already have one).

    1. A Lifetime Sub includes all the standard perks (plus a few) and can be picked up via Locals, Substack, or Bitcoin (whichever you prefer).

  2. Email “bryan at lunduke.com” and let me know how you would like your name displayed (“Joe A.”, “Joseph Arnold”, “JoeyPants”, “SirJJMcManly”, etc.)

It’s first come, first served.

If you’ve already emailed me about being added to the wall, your spot is secured.

For the rest of you: Chop chop. At the current rate, I would be very surprised if the “Amiga Wall” wasn’t full by some time this weekend.

“Lifetime Wall 7” will be unveiled after the final name is added to the Amiga Wall. And, yes, it will be a different (awesome) retro computing platform.

As always, a huge thank you to every subscriber to The Lunduke Journal. Absolutely none of this would be possible without your support.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals