Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Myth: "ENIAC was the first programmable computer"
Awesome? Yes. But the first? Not even close.
April 12, 2024
post photo preview

What was the first programmable computer?

An historically significant, yet simple question... right?  Considering how important computing was, in the 20th century, you'd think we should be able to provide a consistent, difinitive answer to that question.

And, yet, if you ask most sources... they'll get it wrong.

Go a head.  Ask almost any source, "What was the first programmable computer?".  Most of them will give you the same answer.  The ENIAC.

Case in point, here's Google:

Not quite, Google.

And, just for good measure, Bing:

Wow.  Bing seems convinced!

We could go through examples of sources getting this wrong all day long -- from encyclopedias to AI chatbots... to people on Twitter who "totally know about computers".

Instead, let's debunk this myth right now:

The ENIAC was not the first programmable computer.

And the proof is simple.  Here is a chronological list of some notable, early (successful) efforts at building a programmable computer.

  • 1938 - Z1
  • 1940 - Z2
  • May 12, 1941 - Z3
  • 1942 - Atanasoff-Berry Computer
    • Note: Not Turing complete
  • Dec, 1943 - Colossus Mark 1
    • Note: Not stored program
  • Jun 1, 1944 - Colossus Mark 2
    • Note: Not stored program
  • Aug 7, 1944 - Harvard Mark I (Automatic Sequence Controlled Calculator)
  • Dec 10, 1945 - ENIAC

Even if we fully discount the Atanasoff-Berry Computer (often known simply as "ABC"), due to it not being fully programmable (and not Turing complete)...

And, even if we discount both of the Colossus machines (Mark 1 and Mark 2) because neither of them were stored program computers (meaning programs needed to be entered manually, via switches, each time the computer ran)...

That still leaves the Z1 (1938), Z2 (1940), & Z3 (1941, all built by Konrad Zuse) and the Harvard Mark I (fist operational in 1944, designed by Howard Aiken) as being fully functional prior to the ENIAC.

Which means that -- at best -- the ENIAC was the fifth functional, programmable computer.  And that's being more than a little generous to the ENIAC (because, honestly, I think we should include the Colossus machiens in there as well... bumping ENIAC down to 7th place).

The ENIAC was still pretty awesome

None of this takes away from the significance of the ENIAC -- it was a grounbreaking machine, moving away from many of the electromechanical components of computers like the Harvard Mark 1.  The result was a significant boost in speed, and significant design changes.

The ENIAC.  Awesome, right?

And, perhaps that is one reason why this myth -- that the ENIAC was the first programmable computer -- has persisted as long as it has.

  • The Harvard Mark 1 and the Zuse machines all had some amount of mechanical parts... the ENIAC moved over almost entirely to electronic parts.
  • The earlier Colossus computers were also electronic... but did not have stored programs.  The ENIAC did.

The tenacity of this myth may also simply be due to the fact that ENIAC had some fantastic PR.

Either way, while the ENIAC was -- clearly -- not the first programmable computer (nor the first digital or electronic computer)... it was still... very, very cool.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
7
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
72 Million Desktop Linux PCs

Based on available data, as of June, 2025, there are as many as 72 Million Desktop PCs running Linux. Which is more than all Apple Ils, Amigas, & Win 3.1 PCs combined. Ever.

00:15:56
Linux YouTube Channel Hits 1 Million Subs... or Did It?

The "Learn Linux TV" YouTube channel hit 1 Million subscribers. But how many of those are bots? At first glance... a lot. Possibly most. The Dead Internet Theory is real.

00:17:14
Free Software Conference Ramps Up The Wokeness

Sessions on "Databases and Diversity" and "intersectionality" are featured in the FOSSY conference later this month. Where masks and daily Covid tests are encouraged.

00:07:38
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
4 hours ago

Unlike Lunduke ...

Your Favorite YouTube Channel is (Probably) Owned By Private Equity - YouTube

Update on the new job:

Well, I haven’t been around much. This new job has had me so busy I’ve barely had time to do anything other than work and sleep. It’s also the first time I’ve really felt challenged by a job since I first got started in IT about 6 years ago. Truth be told, I had definitely gotten complacent on the help desk and repair side of things and am having to break some bad habits.

Also got sick last week with the flu. The whole family got it. That sucked something terrible. Probably top 3 sicknesses I’ve ever had. Anyway, I’m glad we’re all on the mend and I’m hoping to get some time to do some more tinkering soon. Now it looks like I’ve got about a month and a half’s worth of Lunduke videos to catch up on, lol.

"April May 2, 2017" 🤣🤣🤣 Reminds me of the Look Around You teletext screen showing the date as "Apr 04 Sep"

post photo preview
Mozilla Fest 2025: Climate Justice & Resisting Borders

While Mozilla may be on the brink of losing 80%+ of their revenue — depending on the final remedies of the DOJ v. Google case to be announced in a few weeks — that’s not stopping the Firefox maker from charging forward, full steam ahead, on their new business strategy: Political Activism.

Case in point: In November, Mozilla will be hosting their annual “Mozilla Festival” event.

And they have just announced their headline speaker: Dr. Ruha Benjamin.

 

Dr. Ruha Benjamin, in her own words, writes, teaches and speaks “widely about the relationship between innovation and inequity, knowledge and power, race and citizenship, health and justice.”

Inequity. Race. Justice.

In fact, Dr. Benjamin has written multiple books and articles around those topics.

 

Including writing the foreword to a book about “Resisting Borders”. Specifically regarding countries, like the USA, who are “imperialist states” who “brutally oppressed migrants” and “enforce their borders” (which is described as an evil act).

 

BLM. Abolish police. Resist borders. Dr. Benjamin’s work is stereotypical of Leftist Extremist activism.

Which appears to be in line with the “Themes” of Mozilla Festival 2025 — which includes a focus on “climate justice and shared responsibility”.

 

All of which meshes perfectly with Mozilla’s stated strategy and goals. Late last year, Mozilla announced a “brand refresh” to move away from being a “tech company”. They were now a “global crew of activists”.

 

And, to underline their new “activism” strategy, they held an event in November of 2024 — “MozFest House Zambia” — at a luxury resort in Africa.

This event included multiple sessions on promoting Marxism, fighting Capitalism, and — this is not a joke — “Using feminist, decolonial approaches [to support] AI technology, centring marginalized communities, particularly women, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and Indigenous groups disproportionately affected by climate change.”

 

You’ll notice that none of this has anything to do with Mozilla’s flagship product, Firefox. Nor HTML or Javascript (or anything else that makes up “the web”).

You know… the things that made Mozilla profitable.

One has to wonder what the Mozilla Board of Directors is planning by approving such a dramatic change in strategy at a time when they face a near total loss of revenue. It certainly looks like a last, desperate act in an attempt to keep a ship afloat.

Read full Article
post photo preview
It’s an “Articles Only” Week at The Lunduke Journal

Instead of the regular shows (audio podcasts & videos), The Lunduke Journal will be publishing only articles for the next week.

I’m traveling this week, and recording shows is a little tricky. But there are some great stories that deserve to be told — so articles it is!

Be sure you’re following The Lunduke Journal on any of the four platforms where articles are published (all are free to follow be alerted to new articles).

-Lunduke

Read full Article
post photo preview
Are we witnessing the final days of Mozilla?

The DOJ v. Google case — which found that Google has been violating antitrust laws related to its monopoly position in the Search Engine market — is weeks away from ending the remedy phase. Judge Mehta is expected to issue his final decision some time in August (next month).

 

Significantly for Mozilla, one of the most heavily pushed (by the DOJ) remedies would block Google from paying Mozilla for default search engine placement within Firefox. This would, effectively, end over 80% of Mozilla’s yearly revenue… and force the company to dramatically downsize.

During the court trial earlier this year, the Mozilla CFO testified that, should this happen, Mozilla “may be forced to scale back operations”.

 

At the same time as the DOJ v. Google case is moving quickly towards a conclusion, the US government has pulled Mozilla funding — resulting in renewed, desperate pleas from Mozilla, asking for donations to attempt to cover the lost tax payer revenue.

Mozilla appears to have a four pronged approach to securing funding and staying in business:

  1. Fight the DOJ v. Google case (both in court and public opinion).

  2. Rebrand (and re-focus) on political activism in the hopes of securing new funding sources. (They are now a “global crew of activists” focused on Marxist causes.)

  3. Monetize data collected from Firefox users. (See: Firefox recently changing their Terms of Use to allow Mozilla to collect user data.)

  4. Encouraging users to donate.

 

Many questions remain in this saga:

  • Will Judge Mehta tell Google to stop payments for Search Engine placement? We’ll find out very soon.

  • Will Google appeal after the remedies are handed down? (Most likely.)

  • If so, what will the outcome of that appeal be? And how will default Search Engine payments be impacted during the appeal?

  • Will Mozilla see enough success in their new business of being a “global crew of activists” to avoid significant layoffs?

According to multiple sources within Mozilla — who have spoken to The Lunduke Journal on the condition of anonymity — employees have deep concerns about the future of the company, the leadership currently in power, and the stability of their jobs through the end of this year.

Now, Mozilla has several hundred million dollars in cash on hand. Which means, even if they experience the loss of 80%+ of their revenue… they have enough runway to keep them afloat at least for a little while. But burning through savings to keep a company afloat is not a great long term strategy.

What will Mozilla look like this time next year?

Heck… what will Mozilla look like this time next month?

It’s going to be interesting to watch as this unfolds.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals