Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
W: The Window System before X... that nobody seems to remember
(Nobody seems to even know what it looked like.)
August 16, 2023
post photo preview

Most users of Linux or UNIX, nowadays, are quite familiar with the X Window System — the display server that has powered our graphical workstations for decades (in one iteration or another).

The “window system X”, as it was initially called, was created as a fork of another window system (known as “W”), back in June of 1984.

Here is the announcement email, of “window system X”, from Robert Scheifler (at MIT):

From: rws@mit-bold (Robert W. Scheifler)
To: window@athena
Subject: window system X
Date: 19 Jun 1984 0907-EDT (Tuesday)

 

I've spent the last couple weeks writing a window system for the VS100. I stole a fair amount of code from W, surrounded it with an asynchronous rather than a synchronous interface, and called it X. Overall performance appears to be about twice that of W. The code seems fairly solid at this point, although there are still some deficiencies to be fixed up.

 

We at LCS have stopped using W, and are now actively building applications on X. Anyone else using W should seriously consider switching. This is not the ultimate window system, but I believe it is a good starting point for experimentation. Right at the moment there is a CLU (and an Argus) interface to X; a C interface is in the works. The three existing applications are a text editor (TED), an Argus I/O interface, and a primitive window manager. There is no documentation yet; anyone crazy enough to volunteer? I may get around to it eventually.

 

Anyone interested in seeing a demo can drop by NE43-531, although you may want to call 3-1945 first. Anyone who wants the code can come by with a tape. Anyone interested in hacking deficiencies, feel free to get in touch.

Cool… So what, exactly, is “W”?

Now that we know that “W” is the inspiration (and original source code for) “X”… wouldn’t it be amazing to know more about W? How it worked, what it looked like, etc.?

Finding detailed information on the “W Window System” is astoundingly difficult.

In fact, almost every mention of “W” seems to consist entirely of variations on the following text (found on Wikipedia):

The W window system is a discontinued windowing system and precursor in name and concept to the modern X Window System window system.

 

W was originally developed at Stanford University by Paul Asente and Brian Reid for the V operating system. In 1983, Paul Asente and Chris Kent ported the system to UNIX on the VS100, giving a copy to those working at MIT's Laboratory for Computer Science.

 

In 1984, Bob Scheifler of MIT replaced the synchronous protocol of W with an asynchronous alternative and named the result X.

 

Since this time the X window system has gone through many fundamental changes and no longer bears any significant resemblance to W.

And… that’s it.

Screenshots? Technical details? Documentation? Nope. None of that.

This is not the original W

Fun side note: The Wikipedia entry for W (which I quote above), includes a link to an email thread that, at first glance, appears to be discussing the W from the early 1980s.

but it’s not. What that thread is referring to is a completely different Window System, from the 1990s, which also was named “W”That Window System looked like this:

This is NOT the “W” Window System from the 1980s

What is wild, is there is significantly more information about this 1990s Window Server -- which very few people have actually used -- than there is about the, deeply historically significant, 1980s W.

Great. So what DO we know about the original W?

We know that W is a Windowing System developed, originally, for the V Distributed Operating System.

The V Distributed System (sometimes just called V-System) was developed at Stanford starting in 1981. It had its own display system called “Virtual Graphics Terminal Service” (or VGTS). Files and (some) source code from V has been archived by the folks at BitSavers.org.

And those archives do contain a piece of software called “w”. But, once again, it is not the 1980’s display server “W”. The “w” contained in the V archives is a command which lists users connected to the V system.

The name of the W Window System was chosen because it ran on V.

W was next in alphabetical order. (Which is also why “X Window System” is called “X”… it is the next letter after “W”.)

In 1983, W Window System was ported to the VAXstation 100 (and, hence, to UNIX).

Let’s look at the VAXstation 100

From the VAXstation 100 technical summary document (released in 1984)

Hey, hey! What have we here? Is that a graphical desktop I see?

Could this be the elusive “W Window System” that inspired X?

Let’s take a closer look at another page from the VAXstation 100 technical summary:

After reading absolutely everything in the Technical Summary, there is no mention of “W”. Instead the graphical interface is called the “VAXstation Display System Software”.

This is continued in the VAXstation 100 Users Guide, which was published in June of 1984. The illustrations in that document appear to match the photos in the Technical Summary document.

From the June 1984 VAXstation 100 Users Guide

This appears to be the only reference to “VAXstation Display System” in existence.

However.

In October of 1984 (just a few months after those documents were published), the “VAXstation I” was released. And, with it, the first (possibly) official graphical desktop for VAX/VMS systems: VMS Workstation Software (VWS).

Now, according to Wikipedia, the VMS Workstation Software was not released before October of 1984.

Which leaves us with a few possibilities:

  1. Wikipedia is wrong (it often is).

  2. The “VAXstation Display System” is an earlier name for “VMS Workstation Software”… it does only precede it by a few months, after all.

  3. The “VAXstation Display System” is simply “W” (which was developed the year before the documentation above)… but rebranded.

The likelihood is that the “VAXstation Display System” is just a different terminology for “VMS Workstation Software” that was used in documentation a few months before the release of the VAXstation I. But that is purely conjecture based on the available data.

How do we find out more about W?

The reality is this:

In order to get W running, we need:

  • A way to properly emulate 1983 / 1984 versions of the “V Distributed Operating System” developed at Stanford.

  • And a copy of W.

Or…

  • A working VAXstation 100.

  • And a copy of W.

Either way, we need a copy of W. Which we don’t have.

Case in point: W Window System doesn’t seem to exist anywhere on the entire Internet. Either in binary or source code form.

In short: Here’s what we don’t know about W

We don’t know, with any certainty…

  • What W looked like

  • How W functioned

  • What, specifically, was changed between W and X

If any of you have additional details, I would love to hear about it. The fact that such a critical part of computing history is largely lost is a sad thing… one that deserves to be rectified.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
6
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Lunduke's Week in Tech - Aug 23, 2025

USA Owns Intel & Microsoft's Intifada Problem (Plus: UK Says Email Causes Drought)

The Article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/lundukes-week-in-tech-aug-23-2025

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:39:03
Microsoft "Intifada" Shut Down After 4 Hours

Note: This video is being made free for all due to the nature of the news story. While all Audio Podcasts and Articles from The Lunduke Journal are always free, many videos are exclusive for subscribers. More details, and links, at Lunduke.com.

After the "Worker Intifada" declared they would occupy Microsoft Campus "as long as it takes" for Microsoft to cut ties with "the murderous Zionists", the event barely lasted past lunch.

The Article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/worker-intifada-occupies-microsoft

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:34:11
Lunduke's Week in Tech - August 15th, 2025

Linux Kernel Chaos & The Non-Woke Software List

The Article: https://lunduke.substack.com/p/lundukes-week-in-tech-aug-15-2026

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:45:49
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

#DailyWire Is Reading Lunduke Journal

It's the only explanation, eh @lunduke?

post photo preview

[Poll] Year of Linux vs "Big OS" Neo-Feudal Rule... What Kind of Future?

😾 Disclosure: Watching Windows Update Download/Install for 90 minutes got me Triggered about the state of "Non-Commercial-Computing" (see WEF on "You Will Own Nothing and BE HAPPY" ). Article Links at the bottom.... Not counting Microsoft's "Activists for Intifada." 🙈 "No Comment" is my vote.

In simple terms, "Server Linux" will be AWESOME (see Web Servers + Super-Computers). However, "Home Users" who want a Reliable Desktop Environment on Linux OS - Forget It!!!

In all fairness though, Windows 11 User will be screwed.... Techno-Feudalism only favors the Powerful (Corporate) and the "Well-Connected" (Political). You won't even be able to boot your computer unless your Internet-Login-ID has been validated (typically by SmartPhone "fingerprint" PKI registered with a certificate authority).

We could get LUCKY! ... 🌈 💾 🦄 DOGE OS ("Free" Release-Candidate-1) created in 4 ...

Framework is hardcore championing Omarchy despite the woke crowd complaining about the distro's creator and their political leanings. (DHH is an awesome person, and I find it hard to believe anyone could have a problem with him.)

In other news, I use Omarchy, btw.

post photo preview
post photo preview
Omarchy 2.0 - The Arch-Based, Hyprland, Non-Woke Distro
The 2.0 release of the unabashedly nerdy, developer focused, & DEI-free Linux distribution is here. And people are flocking to it.

Omarchy, an Arch-based Linux distribution which self-describes as “An opinionated Arch + Hyprland Setup”, has just published their 2.0 release.

 

Omarchy was started by David Heinemeier Hansson (DHH), the creator of Ruby on Rails, as a command-line and developer focused (and unabashedly nerdy) configuration of Arch Linux.

In the short time since it began (back in June), Omarchy has captured a massive amount of interest and has grown to become a full-fledged distribution in its own right.

Omarchy 2.0 boasts a new ISO installation method, AUR-free installation, a Chrome micro-fork with live theme switching, a Starship prompt, a new icon, and 400 other changes (from 45 contributors).

 

According to DHH, the Omarchy Discord now has over 6,000 members with the website having received over 100,000 unique visitors in the last month.

Not too shabby for a Linux distribution that is only 2 months old.

Speaking of Discord, if the Omarchy installation fails, it displays a QR code with an invite link to the Omarchy support channel. I thought that was a rather nice touch.

 

Worth noting that Omarchy — and the Hyprland window manager, which Omarchy uses by default — both were added to “Lunduke’s Non-Woke Software List” this month.

 

Omarchy is yet another Open Source project which has steered clear of Woke & DEI politics… and has seen tremendous success and adoption. We have seen that same scenario play out repeatedly now, with projects like OpenMandriva, XLibre, Hyprland, & Brave.

Avoid DEI. Experience a flood of users, contributors, and excitement.

A pattern is emerging. Hopefully more projects learn this important lesson.


The Lunduke Journal is the last bastion of truly independent Tech Journalism. Ad Free, Big Tech Free, Non-Woke, & Audience Supported.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Microsoft Adds Copilot AI to Excel
Microsoft warns users not to use Copilot in Excel spreadsheets “for any task requiring accuracy or reproducibility”.

Buckle up, Buttercup. Because you’re about to hear about one of the stupidest features ever added to a piece of software.

Microsoft has added their Copilot AI to Excel — so you can have an AI chatbot embedded into cells of your spreadsheet.

 

In case you were wondering just how bad of an idea this is, Microsoft is explicitly warning people that “Copilot uses AI and can give incorrect responses”.

In fact, Microsoft says you should NOT (they put “NOT” in all caps, so you know they mean it) use Copilot in Excel “for any task requiring accuracy or reproducibility” or for “tasks with legal, regulatory or compliance implications”.

 

I mean, really. Who uses spreadsheets for silly, math-y things like “accuracy” or “reproducibility”?

Another thing to keep in mind: Using Copilot AI within Excel means sending your spreadsheet data to Microsoft for analysis. Worth thinking about if you are using Excel for something like a “business”, or “government”, or “personal financial data”.

 

If that isn’t enough to deter you, and if you really hate that whole “accuracy” thing — and have a Microsoft 365 Copilot license — you can grab the Windows or Mac versions of Office in the Microsoft Beta Channel.


The Lunduke Journal is the last bastion of truly independent Tech Journalism. Ad Free, Big Tech Free, Non-Woke, & Audience Supported.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Ladybird Gains Google Sheets Support
Ladybird dev says: “Been told many times over the years that ‘you’ll never get complex stuff like Google Docs running’ lmao.”

The Ladybird web browser can now handle Google Sheets.

 

Watching as Ladybird rapidly gains support for increasingly complex websites (and web “apps”) is a truly marvelous thing.

As the lead developer of Ladybird says, it’s not perfect. But increasingly usable.

I mean, heck. Look at that. That’s Google Sheets. Running in a web browser that is not based on Firefox or Chrome.

 

The real question, for many of us, is “how long until we can use Ladybird as our daily web browser?”

According to the team, “Summer of 2026” is their target for the first official “Alpha” release. And my guess is… they’re probably about right. But, based on the rapid progress, I’d say it’s also reasonable to assume that super-duper-early adopters can probably start daily test driving Ladybird a bit sooner than that.

It seems like we are seeing significant new functionality, and site support, almost every day. Here’s Cal.com running in Ladybird.

 

And here one of the developers is showing off gamepad support. Which. Awesome.

 

Let this be your regular reminder: Anybody who is telling you “you can’t build [insert project here], it’s too hard and requires a massive team”… is full of doggy doo-doo.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals