Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
The Worst Part of Open Source: The Community
Open Source has a lot of strong points… “The Community” is not one of them.
September 11, 2024
post photo preview

"Oh-muh-gosh!  Community is so important to Open Source!"

How often do we hear that?  How often are we inundated with declarations of how absolutely amazing the "Linux Community" or the "Open Source Community" are?

Constantly.

There are entire conferences dedicated to Open Source "Communities" -- and nearly every company or foundation which is even remotely "Open Source-y" has an official "Community Manager" position.  Sometimes several of them.

 

The Heck With That

 

Well, I'm here to say what most of us are thinking (but are afraid to say out loud):

The "Community" is the absolute worst part of Open Source Software.

Search your feelings.  You know it to be true.

Over the last few years we have seen an onslaught of attacks -- on the software we use and love (and the people that build and use that software) -- perpetrated by that "Community" that is deemed so important and amazing.

Here are 5 quick examples to give you an idea of what the "Open Source Community" does.

The examples go on, and on, and on.  We could spend all day listing recent incidents where the "Open Source Community" has actively brought about significant harm and destruction -- both to the software they claim to support... and to the people who build and use it.

In fact, I would say there is a very strong case to be made that the "Community" is the single biggest problem with Open Source Software.

 

Not All Communities Are Good

 

A "Community" of people can be a fantastic, productive, supportive force.  But, if that was ever the case with the "Open Source Community" -- and, I believe, at one point (long ago) it was -- it certainly is not anymore.

The word "Community" gets thrown around -- rather constantly -- as if it's some magical, always wonderful thing.  When the truth is often the exact opposite.

Case in point: An enraged mob carrying torches and pitchforks.  That's a community.

 

 

A group of zombies, shuffling together towards their next meal (your brains).  That, also, is a community.

 

 

We could list an almost endless number of examples of "communities" which are destructive and, in many cases, downright evil.  But I think you get the point.

The hard reality is that the "Open Source Community" has become something akin to the torch-wielding mob (with a dash of zombie thrown in for good measure).

Destructive.  Angry.  Terrorizing.

And, importantly, striking fear in the hearts of any who dare oppose the mob.

An anecdotal example:

Recently, I was having a discussion, via E-Mail, with the founder of a prominent Open Source project.  There had been a round of mob-like attacks on some of the members of that project (because that's what happens in Open Source projects with a "Community"), and I was working on an article covering those events.

All very ordinary.  That sort of thing happens weekly.

Then the founder of that project requested -- nay... pleaded -- that I hold off on publishing the article.  And, if I did publish the article, to not include the founders name or indicate that we had spoken at all.

Because, and I quote, "I worry that it will make things *worse* for me."

The founder feared what the mob (aka the "Community" of the Open Source project which that person had created) would do if they found out we had simply spoken.

If you speak out against the mob (the "Community")... the mob attacks you.  Everyone knows it.  And everyone fears it.

 

The Mob Will Continue if We Let It

 

That project founder is not alone.

It is exceedingly rare that more than a few days go by without hearing about similar situations -- people (contributors, founders, and users) bullied and terrorized into silence by a mob hiding behind the moniker of "Open Source Community".

A mob which has been -- often -- granted extreme levels of power over projects, foundations, and corporations.  Power which they use to drive away founders, contributors, and users and -- along the way -- effectively hold the remaining contributors hostage through an environment of terror.

This "Community" is, observably, causing more damage to Open Source than any other single thing I can think of.

Make no mistake... Open Source Software is, in my opinion, a wonderful, positive thing.  Software being "Open Source" allows it to be used and maintained long past the time the original developers may have moved on or dropped support.  It facilitates increased security testing, historical preservation, and so many other benefits.

In short, Open Source -- both the concept and practical implementation -- is worth saving.

The question is: How can this "Community" be stopped?  How can we, effectively, disarm this mob... this "Community"?

I suggest the two following actions.

 

  1. Speak out when the "Community" bullies you (or others).  Directly.  Publicly.  If you fear retribution (as so many do), reach out to the press to discuss how to publish your story while retaining your anonymity.
  2. For project founders: Retain (or re-obtain) absolute control over your project.  Be a dictator.  If the "Open Source Community" is allowed any level of unchecked control over your creation (including something as seemingly simple as "moderation of a forum"), the "Community" will use it to harm you and others.  One person must always have dictatorial control -- the right to over-ride anything -- within a software project.

 

This may sound harsh -- and rather extreme -- to many of you.  Unfortunately, the harsh reality of the "Open Source Community", necessitates these sorts of measures in order to limit the effectiveness of the mob.

The more people that speak out about the bullying and terror tactics of the mob... the safer it gets for others to speak out as well.  Likewise removing power from the mob is always a smart move when dealing with... well... a mob.

Many will criticize the things I am saying here.  They will say that I am "anti-Community" or "anti-Democracy" or the like.  It is a near certainty that members of the "Open Source Community" will hurl a wide variety of insults my way.  That is expected.

Nothing enrages the mob (aka the "Open Source Community") more than speaking the truth publicly.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
18
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Only One Person is Tracking GNOME Security Issues... & He Just Quit

"Nobody else is tracking GNOME security issues," says Red Hat employee.

Oregon Trail, Keen, & Leisure Suit Larry Lifetime Walls:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/8088259/oregon-trail-keen-leisure-suit-larry-lifetime-walls

Get on The Wall with a Massively Discounted Lifetime Sub:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/50-off-yearly-and-massively-discounted

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:11:58
"Linux is NOT a Social Warrior Project," Torvalds Says Incorrectly

A strange statement, considering Linus, himself, regularly uses the Linux Kernel (as a weapon) to promote Leftist, Social Warrior political activism.

Get on The Wall with a Massively Discounted Lifetime Sub:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/50-off-yearly-and-massively-discounted

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:12:27
Ubuntu Makes Removing Buggy Rust Clones Even Harder

You'll use untested Rust code, and you'll be happy.

Get on The Wall with a Massively Discounted Lifetime Sub:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/50-off-yearly-and-massively-discounted

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:10:04
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
6 hours ago

So I want to make this weekend interesting. So I will let the community decide if I replace my install of Venedfoul Wolf with LCOS 0.1 this weekend. To be perfectly claear I'm talking about replacing my daily driver here.

[Poll] Is It Time for a "Total Forking" of Linux? (comments are welcome)

https://lunduke.locals.com/post/8085928/linux-is-not-a-social-warrior-project-torvalds-says-incorrectly#comments

Note: The "forks" below are more like Categories, not strict literal specifications.

This is about Linus Torvalds saying that Linux is not about "Social Warrior Activism."
📑 Why not go "All In" for the KNOWLEDGE DESERVES TO BE FREE concept of Software (which has been Understood for Decades)?

Should "Linux" have a Trademark, a Patent, and Copyright - and act like Microsoft and all of the other CORPORATE "SPONSORS" in "The Linux Foundation"?

16 hours ago

It has happened. Claude's latest model won't be subscription based. Instead, it will be pay per token.

This was inevitable, of course, and it's the first step toward a future where prices reflect actual costs. How will this affect usage by developers and corporations? We shall see.

post photo preview
post photo preview
Oregon Trail, Keen, & Leisure Suit Larry Lifetime Walls

Holy frijoles! There are now 20 (twenty!) Lifetime Subscriber Walls, filled with the names of roughly one bazillion Lunduke Journal supporters.

Just amazing.

Two super quick updates:

  1. The “Desqview/X”, “NeXTSetp”, & “TRS-80 Model 100” Walls are now full! (Check them out on Lunduke.com and at the end of new shows.)

  2. There are 3 new Walls available to put your John Hancock on… and, just for kicks, these ones aren’t from Classic Operating Systems… they’re Classic Games:

    1. Oregon Trail

    2. Commander Keen 4

    3. Leisure Suit Larry

 

I don’t expect space on these Walls to last long. First come first served.

A huge thank you to all of The Lunduke Journal subscribers. Your support is deeply appreciated. You make this possible.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
post photo preview
TRS-80 Model 100 joins The Lunduke Journal Lifetime Wall party!

Buckle up, Buttercup. Because The Lunduke Journal is about to blow your mind.

  1. The “BeOS” Wall Lifetime Subscriber Wall is now full (see all of them on Lunduke.com)!

  2. We’ve added a new “TRS-80 Model 100” Wall (because we can)! That’s the 19th Lifetime Subscriber Wall! 19!

  3. The discounted Lifetime Lunduke Journal Subscriptions are still available through to the end of this month (July).

Which means there are, as of this exact moment, 4 Walls with space available (see Lunduke.com for the full list of Walls). But these fill up wicked fast.

  1. Emacs (only a few spots left)

  2. Desqview/X (a little less than 2/3rd’s full)

  3. NeXTStep (still plenty of space)

  4. TRS-80 Model 100 (just launched)

 

Nice, right?

Worth noting: The “TRS-80 Model 100” has very limited screen resolution (240 x 64), which means only a small number of names can fit on that wall. If you want on it, I’d let me know right away.

Grab a discounted Lifetime Subscription (if you don’t already have one), then let me know (email “bryan at lunduke.com”) which Wall you’d like to see your name on.

Huge high five to everyone who has already added their name to a Wall. At the current rate, we’ll have over 20 retro computer themed walls, filled with all of your names, by the end of the month.

And, doggone it, that’s amazing.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
Vim beats Emacs!

Well, we’ve done it.

We’ve answered the eternal question: “Which Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscriber Wall would fill with names quicker? Emacs or Vim?”

The answer, it turns out, is “Vim”. And it takes just 8 days.

 

A hearty “Thank You” to everyone who supports The Lunduke Journal by getting Lifetime Subscriptions (massively discounted throughout July) and getting on these walls! You make all of this possible!

Now. How long will it take for Emacs to fill up (matching the same number of names as the Vim Wall)?

Well, right now the Emacs Wall is a hair over 2/3rds of the way full. So we’ll find out!

Welcome NeXTStep Wall!

With the closing of the “Vim” Wall (and the BeOS Wall only having the space for 1 name left), now seemed like a good time to add a new retro computer wall: The NeXTStep 1.0 Wall.

Right now, there are 4 Walls available to add your name to (*cough* massive discount *cough*).

  • NeXTStep (just opened)

  • Emacs (about 2/3rds full)

  • BeOS R5 (1 spot left)

  • Desqview/X (1/2 full)

 

Once again, huge thanks to everyone who supports The Lunduke Journal!

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals