Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Visi On : The failed 1983 graphical desktop that came before Windows or Macintosh
From the legendary company behind VisiCalc
September 03, 2023
post photo preview

Before Microsoft Windows (heck, even before the original Macintosh)… there was 1983’s Visi On.

From the company that brought us the ground-breaking VisiCalc spreadsheet software, Visi On was a full graphical desktop environment for IBM compatible PCs. Historically, it is a pretty big deal.

Did it last beyond the first version? Well… No.

Microsoft saw the awesomeness of Visi On and fought it by pre-announcing that the first version of Windows — which would be cheaper than Visi On — was set to ship just a few months later (which it was never going to… but the announcement cut Visi On sales for sure). And Apple began making a huge splash with the Macintosh unveiling.

On top of the fierce (dare I say, brutal) competition… the company behind Visi On (VisiCorp) was busy tearing itself apart internally. Some of their team leaving the company and launching Lotus 1-2-3, a new spreadsheet program that would prove to be hugely popular and almost totally destroyed sales of VisiCorp’s cash cow, VisiCalc.

Visi On, as a graphical desktop system, was doomed to fail. Right out of the gate.

So many of us — myself included — never really got the chance to use and enjoy this early attempt at a graphical PC desktop. Which is a shame, considering how historically significant the system and company are.

With that in mind, here is a visual walkthrough of what Visi On looks like, feels like, and how it works.

When launched this is the default Visi On display. Monochrome, CGA graphics. Also, you’ll note there are no application, file, or toolbar icons. Visi On, despite being graphical, is a very text-focused interface.

That “Services” window acts as the application launcher. Click on an item in the list to launch that piece of software.

This system, in many ways, doesn’t work quite like most other GUI’s. It’s a bit… well… funky.

Luckily there’s a tutorial to walk you through how to use a mouse (which most people hadn’t used back then)… then through how to work with applications and windows.

Note that we now have two, overlapping, differently sized applications running at the same time (Services and Tutorial, in this case). In 1983 on standard PCs. XTs with 512k of RAM. This did require a 5MB hard drive (which was not hugely common at that time) in order to accomplish.

Scrolling is one of the more odd things in Visi On. There are no scroll bars. You scroll by right clicking on an area that needs scrolling… then dragging. It is, in many ways, a precursor to the “swipe to scroll” of touch screens.

What’s really wild, is this right-click dragging also works on the text “toolbars / menus” at the bottom of the windows. If the application window is too narrow to show all of the text options, you can right click and drag that menu/toolbar from side to side to see (and click) all of the options.

Seriously. You can scroll a menu. Horizontally. It’s wild.

You’ll also note that there aren’t any window buttons. Close, maximize, minimize, etc. Nothing like that here.

In order to “close” a window, you click on the “CLOSE” text button down on the bottom of the screen. It will then ask you “Close which window?” Then click on the window you wish to “close”.

I put “close” in quotes… as you are actually minimizing the window in modern terms. Simply making it invisible. When you click “OPEN” you then select from a list of windows in the top corner of the screen that you wish to make visible again.

Another odd bit: You can’t click and drag on a window to move it around the screen. There are also no “window borders” you can click and drag on in order to resize the windows.

What you can do is click on the “FRAME” text option down on the bottom of the screen. Then you click on the window you wish to re-draw the frame for.

Then you click on where you want the top left corner of that window to be… then where you want the bottom right corner of the window to be. Then the screen redraws with that window in the new location and shape.

At first this is incredibly cumbersome. But, after playing with it for a while, it becomes only moderately cumbersome.

Now let’s talk about some of the key Visi On software, starting with the word processor: Visi On Word.

When you first launch it, you are asked to name the window (not the file… the window). You can then “create” or “revise” a document.

Creating a new document results in a presenting to you a surprisingly powerful WYSIWYG word processor. Performance is even fairly good when typing (very little lag).

The toolbar along the bottom is… strange. You’ll note that capitalization seems almost entirely random. Some options all lower case, others have some capital letters. And the whole toolbar only really fits if you make the window full screen (by clicking the “FULL” option on the bottom of the screen, then clicking on the word processor window). So you end up needing to right click scroll the toolbar quite a bit.

The “Calc” software, likewise, is a surprisingly good spreadsheet program for the time. It is, essentially, a Visi On graphical incarnation of the company's popular VisiCalc… but not quite.

In that screenshot, we’re running Word, Calc, and Services (the launcher). All at once, with overlapping, resized windows. Once again, this was on an XT system with half a meg of RAM. Pretty darned impressive.

Of course, at this point, performance starts to suffer significantly. Running just one program at a time resulted in pretty reasonable performance. Once three are running? Oh, boy. Sluggish would be an understatement.

Every piece of software has a set of application options that can be accessed by clicking on the ever-present “OPTIONS” at the bottom of the screen, then clicking on the window you wish to adjust the options for.

This results in a sort of “options sidebar” opening up on the right hand side of that window with a list of text based options that you select with your mouse. And, almost always, it requires a lot of right-click scrolling to access it all.

This is what the equivalent of a “File Open” or “File Save” dialog is within Visi On. It’s… functional. A bit odd, but functional.

I mean, look at that “done.” toolbar option on the bottom right of that window above. It has a period after it. Just so many weird little things like that throughout the system. The only thing consistent about the UI of Visi On is the inconsistency.

All-in-all, Visi On is absolutely, 100% functional and usable. And, honestly, darned impressive. Especially considering the hardware limitations on the system.

Aesthetically, it’s not all that terrible either! I mean, sure. There’s a heck of a lot of room for improvement. And it’s got some ridiculously clunky parts.

But for a 1.0 release of something that nobody had ever done before on XT hardware with 512k? And using only a CGA display? Color me impressed.

Where would Visi On have gone had the company not torn itself in half due to in-fighting between teams and management (and if the product had simply sold better)? It could have been interesting to see!

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
6
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Groupthink, Tech Journalism, & The Lunduke Journal

Why The Lunduke Journal uses the "10th Man Rule" to counter groupthink in the Tech Industry. (And why you'll definitely disagree with Lunduke sometimes.)

Stick it to Big Tech, 50% off everything at The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/stick-it-to-big-tech-50-off-everything

00:18:10
PSX Emu Dev Forbids Arch Linux Packages

DuckStation developer says, "Next step will be removing Linux support entirely, because I'm sick of the headaches and hacks." Specifically naming Wayland as a source of problems.

00:15:52
The Age of Non-Woke Open Source is Beginning

Non-Woke "Political Protest Forks" like XLibre & Redot are thriving. Non-DEl Linux Distributions like Open Mandriva are as well. But Woke projects? Not doing so well.

The Article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-political-protest-forks

00:21:04
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
Lunduke Journal 50% off (including Lifetime) ends tonight!

Ay, caramba! These Lunduke Journal discounts end tonight (Friday) at midnight!

  • 50% off Monthly — Now $3 / Month (normally $6 / Month)
  • 50% off Yearly — Now $27 / Year (normally $54 / Year)
  • 50% off Yearly MP4 Downloads — Now $27 / Year (normally $54 / Year)
  • 50% off Lifetime Subscriptions — Now $100 (normally $200)

Grab one. Support The Lunduke Journal. Save some moolah.

Here’s all the details on how to snag a discount:

https://lunduke.substack.com/p/stick-it-to-big-tech-50-off-everything

  • Lunduk
10 hours ago

Coined two new terms: thinkerbaiting and RBM

post photo preview

The untold impact of cancellation:
https://pretty.direct/impact

post photo preview
LibreOffice Developer’s Hotmail Account Locked After LibreOffice Criticizes Microsoft
“Wow that looks bad,” says Microsoft employee.

Mike Kaginski, a LibreOffice developer (who works for Collabora), has had his Microsoft-hosted email account, which he uses for open source development, locked for “activity that violates our Microsoft Services Agreement”.

 

Kaginski discovered this when attempting to send an email to the LibreOffice development mailing list (hosted by FreeDesktop). It remains unclear if that specific email (which he sent via another address and was rather bland and technical) was the reason for the ban… or if attempting to send the email was simply the first time the ban was noticed by him.

This happened just days after LibreOffice officially accused Microsoft of engaging in a “Lock-in” strategy by creating “artificially complex”, XML-based office documents.

Are the two events related? Hard to say with any certainty.

To make matters worse, Kaginski has had no success in getting Microsoft to lift his locked email account — with the company making him jump through numerous, impossible hoops (such as requiring him to sign in to submit an appeal for his account being locked… but not allowing him to sign in… because his account is locked).

You got that? Sign in to fix the account you can’t sign in with.

Gotta love a good Catch-22.

Good job, Microsoft.

The Lunduke Journal reached out to a contact, within Microsoft, who made it clear that their group was not aware of the LibreOffice Developer’s locked account, but they were aware of the LibreOffice complaint article regarding “artificially complex” XML lock-in. Adding, “wow that looks bad”.

The Lunduke Journal’s Analysis

The odds of locking a LibreOffice developer’s email account being an official Microsoft corporate decision seems highly unlikely.

Microsoft, as a company, makes a lot of bad decisions — but this would just be too stupid for words. A massive PR blunder.

But could a single employee, feeling grumpy, have done it on an impulse? As some sort of revenge for LibreOffice’s “harsh” words about Microsoft? Sure. That seems entirely plausible?

Though, it’s also entirely plausible that some poorly designed AI-driven “naughty activity” detection bot flagged his account. Or, perhaps, the developer was reported by some random Open Source hooligan who likes to cause chaos (there’s a lot of those).

Either way, the fact that Microsoft requires people to log in — on accounts which cannot log in — in order to file an “appeal” is incredibly amusing. And is very, very typical Microsoft.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Open Source “Political Protest Forks” Thriving
Many called XLibre & Redot nothing more than “political protests” that would quickly die and be forgotten. Boy were those naysayers wrong.

Over the last year, we’ve seen a couple of high profile forks, of large Open Source projects, which were inspired — in part — by a desire to move away from the political discrimination and Leftist Extremism within the original projects.

At the time, when each of these forked projects were started, many predicted that they would go nowhere. That they were nothing more than “political protest forks” — and they would die out quickly.

Let’s check in on both of those project to see if that has happened.

XLibre - The Xorg Fork

Since officially launching, at the end of June (last month), the XLibre project has published a handful of official releases (now up to version 25.0.0.5)… with a significant number of changes and fixes.

 

In fact, considering the significant new features (such as XNamespace Extensions), the first release of XLibre is larger (in every way I can think to measure) than any Xorg release in the last decade. With the number of contributors growing.

How about Operating System support? Many predicted that XLibre would be ignored by every Linux distribution on the planet. That it would go nowhere and nobody would use it.

According to the “Are we XLibre yet?” wiki, a number of systems have already (officially) adopted XLibre. Including: Devuan, Artix, GhostBSD, and (my personal favorite) OpenMandriva.

 

This is important to note: All of that support has occurred even though XLibre has only existed for one month. Several systems already officially supporting it is nothing short of “crazy impressive”. Borderline unprecedented.

In addition, a number of systems have 3rd party repositories which allow users to install and use XLibre. Including: Arch, FreeBSD, Gentoo, NixOS, Slackware, and (seriously) macOS.

 

In short: Growing group of developers. Rapidly growing platform support. New releases which put the original project (Xorg) to shame.

Redot - The Godot Game Engine Fork

The Redot project — which forked off of Godot back in October of 2024 — had a stable release (4.3.1) back in June, and just had a new test release (4.4 Alpha 2). Both with both new features and fixes.

 

In fact, Redot has had 13 releases since the project started late last year.

With an absolutely massive number of commits since then.

 

In short: Steady, new releases. New features and bug fixes. Both stable and testing releases.

These Projects are Thriving

It’s hard to look at either of these projects and come to any conclusion other than they are absolutely thriving.

At this point, it’s looking like those who predicted rapid failure for these “Political Forks” were not only wrong… but wildly, obscenely wrong.

There’s a lesson in there.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Groupthink & Tech Journalism
Why The Lunduke Journal uses the “10th Man Rule” to counter groupthink in the Tech Industry.

If my audience always agrees with me — 100% of the time — I’m probably doing something wrong.

That’s core to the ethos of The Lunduke Journal.

Any Brand X Tech Journalist can publish articles and shows filled with ideas, and facts, which their audience is known to already approve of. It’s easy to play it safe. To tell people — and corporations — what they want to hear. To pander.

We have enough Tech Journalists who do exactly that. Heck, we’re lousy with ‘em.

Put another way: The Lunduke Journal is not here to make friends. Not here to win some “Tech Reporter Popularity Contest”(tm).

Why The Lunduke Journal Exists

The Lunduke Journal exists to tell the truth about the Tech Industry (and world of Computing) — as I see it — no matter what. To tell the stories the other Tech Journalists are terrified of touching, for fear of losing that afore mentioned popularity contest.

The Lunduke Journal publishes leaks from major corporations — royally ticking off all of Big Tech in the process.

The Lunduke Journal shines a light on the discriminatory, DEI, & woke practices of Tech — causing nearly every Tech Industry person, with a Left-leaning political stance, to label me enemy number one (often attacking me, with wildly vulgar statements, in a desperate attempt to discredit me).

The Lunduke Journal investigates the shady business practices of Open Source Foundations and organizations — resulting in nearly every leader within the Free and Open Source world to either fear or despise me (often both).

In fact, The Lunduke Journal publishes stories — ranging from investigative pieces to pure opinion and analysis — which will, undoubtedly, infuriate (or at least annoy) every single nerd on this green Earth of ours.

Prefer Linux, Windows, or Mac? Left, Center, or Right politically? Pro or Anti-Government control over Tech? Star Wars or Star Trek?

Never fear. There will surely be a Lunduke Journal story which you will strongly disagree with. Just give it a little time.

Let me tell you why.

The Tenth Man Principle

Groupthink can be a very dangerous thing. Especially when you already agree with the consensus of the group.

There is a concept where, if 9 men all agree on something — an idea, a fact, a strategy — it is the duty of the 10th man to take a different approach. To pursue a contrary idea or strategy.

In some ways this is a variation on “Playing Devil’s Advocate”, but I prefer the “10th Man Principle” — it is more focused on challenging an entrenched consensus.

Which is where The Lunduke Journal comes in.

When I sit down and read Tech News — and listen to Tech Podcasts or Videos — and 90% of the coverage is all repeating the same position… whenever an extreme consensus has been reached… a red flag is raised. The 10th Man Principle is triggered.

My job is then to take whatever that topic is — a piece of breaking Tech news, a historical fact, an opinion on how Tech should be governed, etc. — and spin it around. Look at it from a completely different angle — and pursue that new line of thinking.

This isn’t about simply being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian.

I must investigate that topic rigorously. Focus on known, verifiable facts. Challenge any assumptions made (by myself or others) in whatever that consensus is. Dig deep. Dig where others have not. See where that investigation leads.

Sometimes that investigation leads to nothing overly interesting or worth publishing. Other times… the results are illuminating and profoundly valuable.

If you’ve followed The Lunduke Journal for any length of time, you’ve seen the results of this ethos. Over and over again.

And I Love It

There are, obviously, some challenges with this approach. To put it mildly.

Corporate sponsorship is — for reasons I clearly do not need to explain — impossible.

Luckily, The Lunduke Journal has an amazing (and generous) audience which keeps the lights on, making corporate sponsorship completely unnecessary. So Big Tech can kiss my tuchus.

On that note, getting employees of any Corporation or Foundation to talk “on the record” is simply not going to happen. In fact, many organizations have firm (and, often, stated) policies of “Don’t talk to Lunduke… ever”.

But, you know what? The brave whistleblowers within those companies have proven far more enlightening than any official statement from an executive could hope to be.

Oh, and that “Tech Journalism Popularity Contest”(tm)? Pshht. Forget about it. Not a chance. Not as long as I continue with the “10th Man Principle”.

If I’m doing my job right, the list of people who consider me an enemy of whatever entrenched, consensus position they hold… will continue to grow.

While, at the same time, the rag-tag group of Lunduke Journal supporters — those amazing nerds who see the need for this work (even though, on occasion, I publish something which challenges one of their deeply held convictions… or, perhaps, because of it) — will also continue to grow.

You know what? I wouldn’t have it any other way.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals