Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Godot Responds to Mass Banning -- No Apology, Blames Banned Users
Plus: Godot censors journalists, asks banned users to beg to be un-banned.
September 30, 2024
post photo preview

Warning: This article contains screenshots of posts and statements which contain obscene and vulgar language.  Those statements are presented here, without edits, in order to accurately record these events.

 

Over the last few days, the team behind the open source Godot game engine has enacted a mass banning -- dubbed a "cleansing" -- of users, developers, and financial supporters who were perceived to have the "wrong" political views.

This morning, the Godot Foundation has -- after tremendous pressure -- issued an official statement on their X account.

 

 

Two images containing text.  The first of which reads as follows:

 

"On Friday, we made a tweet that unexpectedly led to a wave of harassment directed at our staff and community. We unequivocally condemn this abuse.

 

The volume of negative engagement overwhelmed our moderation efforts.

While attempting to protect the Godot community we mistakenly blocked individuals who were not participating in the harassment. The Godot Foundation Board takes full responsibility for these moderation actions.

 

If you believe you were blocked in error and have not violated our Code of Conduct, please contact us with the form linked below. We are committed to swiftly rectifying any mistakes.

 

We firmly stand by our mission to keep our community spaces free from hate, discrimination, and other toxic behaviors.

 

- The Godot Foundation Board"

 

The statement "we made a tweet that unexpectedly led to a wave of harassment directed at our staff" is, based on all available evidence, simply not true.  The majority of bannings, enacted by Godot, appear to have been directed towards people who were makings statements which could not be described as "harassing staff".

Many were variations on "why not focus on software?" or "why are people being banned?"

Likewise, the statement "The volume of negative engagement overwhelmed our moderation efforts" also appears to be false.

During the height of the mass "Cleansing", the employee responsible for "Community & Communications" for Godot openly mocked and insulted those being banned -- and had enough time and energy to "start a folder" of the replies to Godot's actions.

 

 

Got enough time to "start a folder" of people you ban -- and mock them online?  You probably are not "overwhelmed".

Two other points worth noting regarding this statement from the Godot Foundation:

  • It appears as though no banned accounts -- on any platform -- have been un-banned.
  • It also appears as though no action, of any kind, has been taken regarding the Godot team members responsible for the mass bannings.

Both actions would be incredibly simple to take -- and would help to ease the escalating tension between the Godot Foundation and the Godot users (and contributors).  Yet, notably, these actions have been specifically not taken.

That is a choice by Godot.

An additional, shorter statement was made concerning the Godot Discord moderator who called those being banned "the filth of humanity" who can "[censored] off to oblivion".

 

"We strongly condemn the harmful language used by Xananax, moderator of an unofficial Godot-related Discord server.

 

We want to clarify that Xananax is not hired by nor a spokesperson for the Godot Foundation.

 

As an organization, we have our own official Discord server, moderated together with the new volunteers vetted by our team."

 

Two points are worth noting with this statement.

The first is that Godot appears to be distancing themselves from this moderator by stating that this was an "unofficial Godot-related Discord server".

However, this Discord server was listed as the official Discord server -- according to the Godot Foundation website (as of just three months ago).  Likewise, "Xananax" has been often referred to as the "Main Moderator" for multiple years.

Thus proving that "Xananax" was, indeed, an official moderator of the official Discord server for Godot.  At least until... now.

The second point is that the Godot Foundation is "condemn[ing] the harmful language" of their moderator.  But what language, specifically?  Is Godot condemning the statement that their users are "the filth of humanity" who can "[censored] off to oblivion"?  We assume so... but they don't actually specify.

Well, luckily, another official moderator of the new official Godot Discord server has made an announcement to clarify:

 

 

I'll call your attention to the bullet point, second from the end:

 

"Additionally, posts made by community member Xan from back in 2016 have surfaced, that the Foundation had to distance itself from"

 

Wait.  2016?  The Godot Foundation was not condemning the new "filth of humanity" statements?

They were condemning... statements made... 8 years ago?  Seriously?

Well, ok.  What, pray tell, were those 8 year old statements that Godot finally decided to condemn?  Apparently... this is them.

 

 

That's right.  This "Xananax" made those statements on the (then) official Godot Discord server -- which the Godot team was totally fine with (even making Xananax the "main" moderator).

But, now that they've surfaced again, Godot has distanced themselves from those statements.  But not, it should be repeated, the "filth of humanity" statements.  Those statements, apparently, Godot agrees with.

 

Send Us Your Email to Get Unblocked

 

In a truly peculiar move, instead of simply unblocking / unbanning everyone who was "cleansed" over the last few days... the Godot Foundation has posted a Google Form for people to fill out to request a "Block Appeal" specifically for "X/Twitter".

 

 

To fill out this form, Godot is requiring users send them the email address associated with your personal Google / GMail account.

And, bizarrely, this only is for requesting an unblock on X/Twitter.  The mass blocks and bans on Discord and GitHub (source control) are, apparently, not available for appeal.

 

 

Those who have been "cleansed" must plead their case and give a specific reason why Godot, in their infinite mercy, should unban them.

 

So Many Questions

 

Naturally, The Lunduke Journal had some questions.

Specifically:

  • Has any action been taken against any individuals who engaged in the mass banning over the last few days?  Are those individuals still part of the Godot Team?
  • Does the Godot Foundation have a count of how many accounts have been banned and/or blocked (across GitHub, X, and Discord) during these actions?
  • How many of the blocked / banned accounts have been returned to normal?
Those questions (and a chance for providing comment) was sent to the creator of Godot, the Godot Foundation, and the Godot "Code of Conduct" team.
 
After a few hours, with no response of any kind from any member of the Godot Team, I joined the official Godot Discord server -- found the thread that was specifically created, by Godot, for people to ask questions regarding this issue -- and asked my questions again.

 

 

In less than 60 seconds, my questions were deleted by the Godot moderators.

 

 

As I sat there, in the Godot Discord topic -- specifically for asking questions about this issue -- I was amazed as I saw comment after comment, from a wide range of users, get deleted.  Right before my eyes.

More messages were deleted than were allowed to remain.

Journalists, users, developers... none were allowed to ask critical questions.  None allowed to express opinions contrary to the official statement from Godot.

What happens now is anyone's guess.  But Godot sure seems hell-bent on destroying themselves in a hurry.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
22
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
December 10, 2024
Al "Slop" Bug Reports Hurting Python, Curl, & Other Open Source Projects

"Low-quality, spammy, and LLM hallucinated security reports" taking time away from real bugs and features.

00:20:58
December 09, 2024
Microsoft Lessening TPM Requirement for Windows 11?

One week after doubling down on the TPM requirement, Microsoft lightens up. A little. But... why?

00:08:32
December 09, 2024
Inaccurate Computing: AI, Quantum, & The Error-Filled Future

Traditional, binary computing is built on extreme accuracy and consistency. Quantum Computing & Al are founded in uncertainty and computational hallucinations.

What does that mean for the future of computing in general?

00:24:36
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
3 hours ago

Have you heard about YouTube's new audio dubbing? They are rolling it out now. New uploads for select creators and evrntually all creators. Will be copied to other languages, via the formerly named Aloud audio dubbing servive.

While this may help creators reach a wider audience. Who owns the rights to those new language dubbed copies? How might Google leverage that data? Might their AI in another language use creator data? YouTube is bragging about dubbing, but nothing about who owns those copies, or how they may be used.

3 hours ago

As someone who has done a fair share of wifi troubleshooting, this was pretty freaking fascinating

https://blog.apnic.net/2024/05/17/a-transport-protocols-view-of-starlink/

I spent about an hour testing Grok's image recognition feature, this morning. The results were far less than impressive... (Swipe/scroll for more images)

post photo preview
Linux Foundation Drops Linux Spending to Historic Lows in 2024
Plus: Skyrocketing revenue, and no mention of "Diversity" or "Climate Change".

The Linux Foundation, earlier today, released their 2024 Annual Report.  And, hoo boy, is it a doozy.

The short-short version: Massive increase in revenue (now close to $300 Million Dollars), with spending on Linux continuing to drop to historically low numbers.

And, in a dramatic departure from previous years, almost zero discussion of politically charged topics (such as Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, & Climate Change).

Let's start with the numbers.

 

Skyrocketing Revenue

 

First and foremost, it's worth pointing out that -- as of this year -- revenue for The Llinux Foundation is closing in on 1/3rd of a Billion Dollars annually.

 

While The Linux Foundation may technically be a "non profit", those numbers would make many "for profit" corporations blush.  Massive, steady income growth.

Where does the largest bulk of that revenue come from?  Corporate "membership" dues, naturally.  To the tune of over $125 Million USD.

 

With the highest paying corporate members being the likes of Meta, Microsoft, Oracle, Samsun, Red Hat (IBM), Huawei, and the like.

 

 

These corporations pay a premium to have a seat on The Linux Foundation Board of Directors.  Which, it should be pointed out, consists of over 70% GPL violators.

 

 

Spending on Linux

 

One of the peculiar facts about The Linux Foundation is how surprisingly little of their income they spend on... Linux.

And, perhaps even more peculiar still, is the fact that the percentage of their revenue spent on Linux appears to decrease every year.

In 2021, The Linux Foundation spent roughly 3.4% of their revenue on their namesake project.  As of 2024... that number appears to be down to 2.3%.

 

 

And this isn't simply a matter of overall percentages going down (while revenue rises).  Spending on the Linux Kernel is down, year on year, in terms of actual US Dollars as well.

 

 

In fact, the amount currently spent on "Corporate Operations" for The Linux Foundation... is roughly 3 times that of what is spent on the Linux kernel.

As time goes on -- and spending numbers become finalized -- we are gaining an increasingly clear picture of the spending priorities of The Linux Foundation.

 

No Diversity in 2024?

 

In the previous annual report (2023), "Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion" were a critical component.

In the 2023 report:

  • "Diversity" was mentioned 34 times
  • "Inclusion" 17 times.
  • With the general "DEI" topic -- including "LGBTQ" issues -- being a critical component throughout the report.  Page after page of DEI.

This year, in the 2024 report, the words "Diversity", "Equity", and "Inclusion" are never used.  Not once.

Well.  Once.  Barely.  On the second to the last page, in a footnote, you find the following statement: "75% of [travel] funding went to diverse community members."  That, right there is the sum total of discussion around "diversity".

In fact, the "LGBT" acronym is also never used in the most recent report (another significant change from previous years).

This appeas to mark a dramatic shift, away from "DEI", for The Linux Foundation.  At least in terms of messaging.

 

No Climate Change, Either?

 

The 2024 Linux Foundation annual report also contains absolutely no reference to "Climate Change".

"Wait, why would the Linux Foundation be talking about Climate Change," you ask?

Well.  Last year, in 2023, the annual report was filled to the brim with Climage Change -- with 37 distinct references and over 10 pages focused on the topic.

That focus appears to no longer be a priority for The Linux Foundation.

 

The Right to Fork

 

One of the most prominent new topics of the 2024 report was "the right to fork".  Something previous annual reports stayed clear of almost entirely.

 

“The right to fork open source code is at the core of open source licensing. All open source licenses grant the right to fork their code, that is to start a new development effort using an existing code as its base. Thus, code forking represents the single greatest tool available for guaranteeing sustainability in open source software.

 

In addition to bolstering program sustainability, code forking directly affects the governance of open source initiatives. Forking, and even the mere possibility of forking code, affects the governance and sustainability of open source initiatives on three distinct levels: software, community, and ecosystem.”

 

This is particularly interesting, given the stated intention for Russia to hard-fork Linux over the recent ban of Russian programmers from being official kernel maintainers.

 

Other Oddities

 

A few other facts which are worth noting from the 2024 Annual Report:

  • Neither the Executive Director, nor the Board Chair -- in their several pages long opening messages -- mentions the Linux Kernel.  Nor desktop, server, or mobile Linux.  Strange, right?
  • The 2024 Annual Report is only 45 pages long.  Compared to the 2023 report, which clocks in at 160 pages.
  • There is absolutely no mention of the mass banning of Russian developers during 2024.
  • Nor of the various other developers banned from the Linux Kernel this year.

What does all of this mean?  Will the decreasing spending on Linux continue into 2025?  Will the decreased emphasis on messaging around "DEI" issues translate to real-world changes?  Will the "right to fork" emphasis continue if Russia follows through with their proposed Linux kernel fork?

Lots of questions.  Lots and lots of them.

Read full Article
December 10, 2024
The Lunduke Journal Free Show & Article Archive

The Massive Free Lunduke Journal Archive

Looking for a particular video or article?  Below you will find a sampling of Lunduke Journal content, all of which is free for the world to enjoy (subscribers and non-subscribers alike).  

The following list is nowhere near complete -- and is being added to constantly.  If you're looking for a searchable, sortable index of every article and show, you'll want to go to The Lunduke Journal Content Archive at Lunduke.Locals.com/content (which is an added benefit for Lunduke Journal subscribers).

 

Lunduke Journal Articles

(You won't find these many of these stories covered anywhere else.)

Lunduke Journal Computer History Articles

Other Very Nerdy Articles

Lunduke Journal Regular Shows

"Linux Sucks" Shows (in order)

Read full Article
December 08, 2024
$10 Off Yearly, & Discounted Lifetime Lunduke Journal Subscriptions
(Available through end of day Monday, December 9th.)

The Lunduke Journal is 100% ad-free and 100% free from the influence of Big Tech.

To pull off this feat, we run the occasional mini-fundraiser.  A couple days of fundraising and sales to keep every show and article completely free of ads.  Which is pretty sweet.

As of right now -- after 2 days of fundraising last week -- we are just a little short of hitting our December funding needs.

To help push us over the finish line -- and keep the lights on here at The Lunduke Journal -- we're running a super quick sale with two sweet deals:

These deals are available through end of the day, Monday, December 9th.

Want to support truly independent Tech Journalism?  Scroll down.  Pick the subscription deal that's best for you.  Every single penny goes directly towards keeping The Lunduke Journal running (and sticking it to Big Tech).

$10 Off Yearly Subscription

Now through end of day Monday (Dec 9), you can grab a yearly subscription with a $10 discount.

The Famous Lifetime Subscription

The "World Famous Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscription" is exactly what it sounds like. Pay once and get full access to The Lunduke Journal (with all the perks). For life.

New Lifetime Subscriptions are available, for $200, from now through Monday, December 9th. Then this option goes "back into the vault".

Here's how to grab one of these coveted bad boys for yourself:

  • Go to Lunduke.Locals.com/support.

  • Select "Give Once".

  • Enter "200" into the amount field.

  • After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

The Famous Lifetime Subscription (with Bitcoin)

You can also obtain a Lifetime Subscription via Bitcoin.

  • Make sure you have a Lunduke.Locals.com account (a free account works just fine).

  • Send $200 worth of Bitcoin (or more) to the following address:

bc1qyjakve8fywm8pz2v99v57yhjj0vzr2vjze6fcq

  • Email "bryan at lunduke.com" with the following information: What time you made the transaction, how much was sent (in Bitcoin), and the email address you use (or plan to use) on Locals.com.

 

Every subscription is appreciated!  You amazing nerds make The Lunduke Journal possible!

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals