Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Myth: "HTML was invented by Tim Berners-Lee"
The truth? He copied someone else's work.
April 10, 2024
post photo preview

Go to any search engine and type in, "Who invented HTML" and you'll -- almost always -- be given the following answer (or some variation on it):

"HTML was invented by Tim Berners-Lee."

Want to know a little secret?  That is utter hogwash.

"Heresy," you proclaim!  "Everyone knows Sir Tim Berners-Lee, who was knighted by the Queen and won of the Turing Award, created the HyperText Markup Language!  You better have some serious proof to backup such an outlandish claim!"

Challenge accepted.

To start with, let's look at a simple HTML document.

HTML.  I think?  Maybe?

Oh, wait.  Hold up.  I accidentally used the wrong screenshot.  That's not HTML... that's SGML.  A totally different language used several years before HTML.

Here.  Let me post an HTML screenshot.

Or is it the other way around?

Dagnabbit!  I did it again!  This time I accidentally posted a picture showing an HTML sample next to an SGML sample!

Funny.  They look exactly the same.

What the heck is SGML?

SGML -- the Standard Generalized Markup Language (aka ISO 8879) -- was set as a standard back in 1986... 7 years before the release of the HTML 1.0 specification.

Over in Switzerland, at CERN ("Conseil européen pour la Recherche nucléaire" aka "European Organization for Nuclear Research"), Anders Berglund adopted SGML primarily for usage in formatting documentation.

Title page of the CERN SGML User's Guide

That variation on SGML -- dubbed "SGMLguid" -- remained in usage at CERN for several years.  And, in 1987, Tim Berners-Lee was hired as a contractor at CERN.

Where, wouldn't you know it, part of Tim's job was using that CERN implementation of SGML.

A few years later, HTML was born.  Just to jog your memory, here is a document marked up in both Tim's HTML 1.0... and the CERN variant of SGML.

Mic drop.

Find the difference.  I dare ya.

Now, I'm not saying that Sir Tim Berners-Lee directly copied HTML from SGML (and the implementation that Anders Berglund made of it)... wait... yes.  Yes, I am.  I am saying exactly that.

HTML is a copy.

That's not entirely fair to Sir Tim.

In defense of Sir Tim, Knight of Her Majesty the Queen, he did do more than simply make a copy of SGML when "creating" HTML.

In fact, Sir Tim made three -- very important -- changes to SGML in order to make it HTML:

  1. He added the "a href" link tag.
  2. He changed the file extension from ".sgml" to ".html".
  3. He implemented an SGML parser which only implemented a little over a dozen tags from SGML... and ignored the rest.  And called it "HTML".

While item 1 (the HREF tag) is a noteworth change over SGML, items 2 and 3 (which are very real) only serve to reinforce the fact that HTML is -- for the most part -- simply a copy of an existing SGML implementation.  And a less functional one at that.

As an example, here is the very first HTML document ever written.  Which, other than the usge of HREF, is identical to SGML.

The very first HTML document, written by Sir Tim Berners-Lee - December 3rd, 1990

Change that "href" tag to something which SGML recognizes -- such as a different "Anchor" type (which is what the "a" stands for in "a href") -- and this instantly becomes a valid SGML document.

But... HyperText!  That's important!

While the addition of a standardized way of including simple looking HyperText Anchors (aka "links" or "a href") was a welcome addition to SGML... that was, at the time, the only significant change which Sir Tim implemented in his SGML copy known as HTML.

(Other than changing the file extension to ".html", of course.  That was pretty... important.  *cough*)

Back in the late 1980s, people were adding HyperText (and linking between "documents") everywhere.  Shoot.  Apple already had a fully graphical HyperText system known as HyperCard.

HyperCard 1.0

In fact, nearly every major On-Line service of the day included some form of linking between documents.

With the HyperText hype train fully underway -- across the entire computing universe -- it was only natural that any update to -- or copy of -- SGML would include that functionality.

So... yes.  Sir Tim Berners-Lee adding "HREF" to SGML was important.  But, otherwise, HTML was little more than a direct copy of existing work.

None of this is disputed.

These are historical facts that are well documented.  Shoot.  The W3C, itself, agrees with everything I said above.

So why, then, is this important to talk about any of this?

Because the getting history right is important.

The ridiculous myth that "Tim Beners-Lee invented HTML" has been repeated, over and over again, every single day... for decades... resulting in that myth becoming accepted as gospel truth.  With awards and acclaim (and even a knighthood) showered upon Sir Tim, in part, because of that myth.

The work which Tim Berners-Lee did on that initial HTML 1.0 release was -- to put it bluntly -- trivial.  At most.  Bordering on plagiarization.

The reality is... Tim stood on the backs of giants.  He wasn't simply inspired by others... he directly copied them.  To the point where Tim's work is almost indistinguishable (see the screenshots above) from the work which he copied (and is almost always attributed to him).

Some of the giants he stood on the backs of:

  • Anders Berglund (and his work on SGMLguid at CERN).
  • Charles Goldfarb, Edward Mosher and Raymond Lorie (the original creators of GML, upon which SGML was based -- note that "GML" was named after the first letters in their last names).
  • Ted Nelson and Douglas Engelbart for their early (1960s) work on HyperText systems.
  • And so many others.

Every single one of those names contributed something new and significant to the world of HyperText and Markup Languages.  They blazed new trails.

Sir Tim copied the existing SGML, changed the file extension, removed a few features, added an anchor tag (which was a feature everyone and their dog was doing at the time), and released it.

"Modifying a Work" vs "Claiming it as Your Own"

If I were to, for example, fork the Linux kernel -- change one line of code -- and release it as "NotLinuxWinkWink"... I can do that.  It's an open source project, and I can legally make modifications and release copies.

But, if I were to then receive near universal acclaim for inventing "NotLinuxWinkWink"... that's a problem.  Legality aside, that just wouldn't be right.  Or true.

Likewise, if I were to copy the specification for the C programming language... and change one line (or add one feature)... it would not be true to say that I "invented" a new language.  I tweaked something that already existed (that somebody else built).  A little.

Thus is the case with Sir Tim and HTML.

Was Sir Tim an instrumental figure in computing?  You bet.  Does he deserve a mention in the history books because of that?  Absolutely.  And in some positive ways, at that!

But did he "invent" HTML?  Not by a long shot.

And we need to stop repeating that myth.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
31
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Wikipedia Spends $31 Million on "Racial Equity" in 2024

Wikimedia Foundation now has $286 Million in assets, spends 10x more on "Equity" than server hosting.

00:15:50
December 21, 2024
Google Tells Courts How Google Should Be Punished (and Tried to Hide it)

Released Friday before Christmas -- the ideal time to hide any announcement -- in response to losing an antitrust suit, Google proposes no real changes to their company or search business. Unsurprisingly, Mozilla (who likes Google's money) agrees.

00:27:44
December 19, 2024
Mozilla Executive Pay Doubles as Loss of 80% of Revenue Looms

"Mozilla has shifted much of its work toward Al" as funds directed towards African "Digital Justice", "Queer Youth Inclusion", & "Digital Activism for Young Feminists".

00:25:04
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

Rant:
It urks me to no end when companies purposefully sabotage their own products for seemingly no reason at all.

Apple got told by the EU "stick a USB-C charger on your iPhones or else". And whether or not you think the EU should've done that is largely irrelevant to the fact that Apple complied in the most malicious way possible.
All Apple had to do was install a USB-C port and a USB3 controller. Shouldn't be that big of a deal. But, in their infinite wisdom, they decided to nerf it to USB2.0 speeds. Why? No reason. Or at least, no reason that makes any sense whatsoever.

The Google Pixel. Is uses basically vanilla ARM cores put on a custom configuration with their Titan TPU installed. It's not a great chip, it's not a bad chip. It's just kinda meh. ARM updated their GPU which brings with it lots of efficiency gains for battery life and some performance gains when in performance modes. All Google has to do is use the exact same chip setup they already are, and upgrade to the latest cores ...

From X

post photo preview

Should have thought of this earlier, but that's life. Would you like to receive a Christmas card? Send me your information @ [email protected]. It may be a little late (or early for next year), but I'll make sure you get one.

December 22, 2024
Woah! Lunduke Journal has almost hit our funding goals for end of NEXT month!

This is pretty cool: The Lunduke Journal has not only hit our December fundraising goal… but we are currently sitting at around 65% of the way towards our fundraising goal for the end of next month (January). Awesome.

That means we’re a bit ahead of where we need to be… by the end of January. If we can get at least close to that 100% line, over the next week, we won’t need to do any fundraising promotions during January. How awesome is that? 😎

Huge thank you to everyone who has gotten us here — you make The Lunduke Journal possible! Feels good to be ahead!

In order to hit that goal early, we’re just going to do something super simple and low key:

  • Lifetime Subscriptions for $200, via Locals.

  • Lifetime Subscriptions for $190, via Bitcoin.

  • Either for yourself or for a gift.

  • Through December 26th.

All the details below. Or, you know, pick up a standard monthly / yearly subscription (via whatever subscription platform you prefer). No pressure. Everything goes directly towards that January goal — and keeping The Lunduke Journal confidently operating well into the future!

The Famous Lifetime Subscription via Locals (+ Gift Option)

The "World Famous Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscription" is exactly what it sounds like. Pay once and get full access to The Lunduke Journal (with all the perks of subscription on Locals). For life.

Plus: They make a great, nerdy gift.

New Lifetime Subscriptions are available, for $200, from now through December 26th. Then this option goes "back into the vault".

Here's how to grab one of these coveted bad boys for yourself:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Locals.com/support.

  2. Select "Give Once".

  3. Enter "200" into the amount field.

  4. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

Want to purchase a Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscription as a gift for someone else? Here's how:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Locals.com/support.

  2. Select "Give Once".

  3. Enter "200" into the amount field.

  4. Send an email to "bryan at Lunduke.com" with the subject "Lifetime Gift Subscription". Include the email address and / or Locals user name (if they have one) of the person you would like to gift the subscription to.

  5. Lunduke will email you to confirm details.

The Famous Lifetime Subscription (with Bitcoin discount)

You can also obtain a Lifetime Subscription via Bitcoin. Save a few bucks with this option, as Bitcoin processing has fewer fees associated with it.

  • Make sure you have a Lunduke.Locals.com account (a free account works just fine).

  • Send $190 worth of Bitcoin (or more) to the following address:

bc1qyjakve8fywm8pz2v99v57yhjj0vzr2vjze6fcq

  • Email "bryan at lunduke.com" with the following information: What time you made the transaction, how much was sent (in Bitcoin), and the email address you use (or plan to use) on Locals.com.

Nice and easy.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
December 22, 2024
post photo preview
Last week at The Lunduke Journal (Dec 8 - Dec 21, 2024)
Linux Foundation Lowers Linux Spending! IBM, Red Hat, & Mozilla Discrimination Lawsuits! ChatGPT Can't Say Lunduke!

What an absolutely insane month December has been so far.

The annual reports for The Linux Foundation and Mozilla both dropped (and were just as ridiculous as you'd expect).  Massive legal battles moved forward -- involving IBM, Red Hat, Mozilla, & Google.  Oh, and I convinced OpenAI to ban my name from usage in ChatGPT.  How nuts is that?

And, as usual, none of the big stories are being reported by The Generic Brand Tech News (tm) outlets.  The Lunduke Journal remains the only game in town.  All the links are below.

Speaking of which -- all of the links below are to Lunduke.Locals.com.  But you can now officially find all of these shows on a bunch of other platforms.  X, Rumble, Substack, Patreon, YouTube, Facebook, iTunes, Spotify... shoot... just about everywhere.  You can even downlad DRM-Free MP4s of all shows.  How crazy is that?  All the links are over on Lunduke.com.

The Shows

The Articles

The Comics

Previous Few Months

 

Reminder: Check out Lunduke.com for all the handy URLS.  Podcast RSS feeds, contact info, direct links to some of the big shows and articles and a bunch of other goodies.  And be sure to subscribe to The Lunduke Journal to help support the work... and make sure you don't miss out on anything.

Read full Article
December 20, 2024
post photo preview
Funny Programming Pictures Part LXVII
More funny, nerdy pictures than you can [idiom for large quantity understandable by humans]

There are XXXIX pictures in part LXVII of "Funny Programming Pictures".

IX out of X people reading that sentence just googled "Roman Numeral Converter".

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals