Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Myth: "HTML was invented by Tim Berners-Lee"
The truth? He copied someone else's work.
April 10, 2024
post photo preview

Go to any search engine and type in, "Who invented HTML" and you'll -- almost always -- be given the following answer (or some variation on it):

"HTML was invented by Tim Berners-Lee."

Want to know a little secret?  That is utter hogwash.

"Heresy," you proclaim!  "Everyone knows Sir Tim Berners-Lee, who was knighted by the Queen and won of the Turing Award, created the HyperText Markup Language!  You better have some serious proof to backup such an outlandish claim!"

Challenge accepted.

To start with, let's look at a simple HTML document.

HTML.  I think?  Maybe?

Oh, wait.  Hold up.  I accidentally used the wrong screenshot.  That's not HTML... that's SGML.  A totally different language used several years before HTML.

Here.  Let me post an HTML screenshot.

Or is it the other way around?

Dagnabbit!  I did it again!  This time I accidentally posted a picture showing an HTML sample next to an SGML sample!

Funny.  They look exactly the same.

What the heck is SGML?

SGML -- the Standard Generalized Markup Language (aka ISO 8879) -- was set as a standard back in 1986... 7 years before the release of the HTML 1.0 specification.

Over in Switzerland, at CERN ("Conseil européen pour la Recherche nucléaire" aka "European Organization for Nuclear Research"), Anders Berglund adopted SGML primarily for usage in formatting documentation.

Title page of the CERN SGML User's Guide

That variation on SGML -- dubbed "SGMLguid" -- remained in usage at CERN for several years.  And, in 1987, Tim Berners-Lee was hired as a contractor at CERN.

Where, wouldn't you know it, part of Tim's job was using that CERN implementation of SGML.

A few years later, HTML was born.  Just to jog your memory, here is a document marked up in both Tim's HTML 1.0... and the CERN variant of SGML.

Mic drop.

Find the difference.  I dare ya.

Now, I'm not saying that Sir Tim Berners-Lee directly copied HTML from SGML (and the implementation that Anders Berglund made of it)... wait... yes.  Yes, I am.  I am saying exactly that.

HTML is a copy.

That's not entirely fair to Sir Tim.

In defense of Sir Tim, Knight of Her Majesty the Queen, he did do more than simply make a copy of SGML when "creating" HTML.

In fact, Sir Tim made three -- very important -- changes to SGML in order to make it HTML:

  1. He added the "a href" link tag.
  2. He changed the file extension from ".sgml" to ".html".
  3. He implemented an SGML parser which only implemented a little over a dozen tags from SGML... and ignored the rest.  And called it "HTML".

While item 1 (the HREF tag) is a noteworth change over SGML, items 2 and 3 (which are very real) only serve to reinforce the fact that HTML is -- for the most part -- simply a copy of an existing SGML implementation.  And a less functional one at that.

As an example, here is the very first HTML document ever written.  Which, other than the usge of HREF, is identical to SGML.

The very first HTML document, written by Sir Tim Berners-Lee - December 3rd, 1990

Change that "href" tag to something which SGML recognizes -- such as a different "Anchor" type (which is what the "a" stands for in "a href") -- and this instantly becomes a valid SGML document.

But... HyperText!  That's important!

While the addition of a standardized way of including simple looking HyperText Anchors (aka "links" or "a href") was a welcome addition to SGML... that was, at the time, the only significant change which Sir Tim implemented in his SGML copy known as HTML.

(Other than changing the file extension to ".html", of course.  That was pretty... important.  *cough*)

Back in the late 1980s, people were adding HyperText (and linking between "documents") everywhere.  Shoot.  Apple already had a fully graphical HyperText system known as HyperCard.

HyperCard 1.0

In fact, nearly every major On-Line service of the day included some form of linking between documents.

With the HyperText hype train fully underway -- across the entire computing universe -- it was only natural that any update to -- or copy of -- SGML would include that functionality.

So... yes.  Sir Tim Berners-Lee adding "HREF" to SGML was important.  But, otherwise, HTML was little more than a direct copy of existing work.

None of this is disputed.

These are historical facts that are well documented.  Shoot.  The W3C, itself, agrees with everything I said above.

So why, then, is this important to talk about any of this?

Because the getting history right is important.

The ridiculous myth that "Tim Beners-Lee invented HTML" has been repeated, over and over again, every single day... for decades... resulting in that myth becoming accepted as gospel truth.  With awards and acclaim (and even a knighthood) showered upon Sir Tim, in part, because of that myth.

The work which Tim Berners-Lee did on that initial HTML 1.0 release was -- to put it bluntly -- trivial.  At most.  Bordering on plagiarization.

The reality is... Tim stood on the backs of giants.  He wasn't simply inspired by others... he directly copied them.  To the point where Tim's work is almost indistinguishable (see the screenshots above) from the work which he copied (and is almost always attributed to him).

Some of the giants he stood on the backs of:

  • Anders Berglund (and his work on SGMLguid at CERN).
  • Charles Goldfarb, Edward Mosher and Raymond Lorie (the original creators of GML, upon which SGML was based -- note that "GML" was named after the first letters in their last names).
  • Ted Nelson and Douglas Engelbart for their early (1960s) work on HyperText systems.
  • And so many others.

Every single one of those names contributed something new and significant to the world of HyperText and Markup Languages.  They blazed new trails.

Sir Tim copied the existing SGML, changed the file extension, removed a few features, added an anchor tag (which was a feature everyone and their dog was doing at the time), and released it.

"Modifying a Work" vs "Claiming it as Your Own"

If I were to, for example, fork the Linux kernel -- change one line of code -- and release it as "NotLinuxWinkWink"... I can do that.  It's an open source project, and I can legally make modifications and release copies.

But, if I were to then receive near universal acclaim for inventing "NotLinuxWinkWink"... that's a problem.  Legality aside, that just wouldn't be right.  Or true.

Likewise, if I were to copy the specification for the C programming language... and change one line (or add one feature)... it would not be true to say that I "invented" a new language.  I tweaked something that already existed (that somebody else built).  A little.

Thus is the case with Sir Tim and HTML.

Was Sir Tim an instrumental figure in computing?  You bet.  Does he deserve a mention in the history books because of that?  Absolutely.  And in some positive ways, at that!

But did he "invent" HTML?  Not by a long shot.

And we need to stop repeating that myth.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
31
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
DOJ Says Google Must Sell Chrome, Can Keep AI

Plus: No more default Search Engine payments to Mozilla or Apple. Court date is in April with the final decision expected this summer.

00:13:12
Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children

Mandatory corporate insurance for "Gender Affirming Care" for children as young as 3 years old. Microsoft employees encouraged to administer puberty blockers quickly.

Leaked Microsoft documents reveal effort to "Gender Transition" young children:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5515411/leaked-microsoft-documents-reveal-effort-to-gender-transition-young-children

00:16:28
Linus Tech Tips Bans User For Saying "All Racism is Bad"

This is simply the latest example of normal people being silenced and censored, throughout the Tech industry, by Extreme Leftists promoting bigotry.

00:25:29
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

On March 15th, I was scheduled to appear at a FUTO “Don’t Be Evil” event at SXSW. Unfortunately, due to security concerns, I will not be able to attend the event in person. I will have more to say on the details of that security concern next week.

For now, I will say this: The FUTO “Don’t Be Evil” event will be held as planned, and my appearance will be via video. I am disappointed that I will not be able to be there, in person, to give each and every one of you nerds a high five.

Last night, we got home late from one final visit to my Grandma’s house (I hope), and I decided to archive a couple of short articles that I found in an issue of Australian MacUser from 1997. The issue covers Apple’s purchase of NeXT. I’ll be adding more of those articles over the next couple of days, but for now, I want to show you a couple of products that never materialized.

The first is the Halo line of high-end Macs. The line was announced by Apple CEO Gilbert Amelio (just realized I need to fix the spelling in the article) but was canceled when Jobs took over. I couldn’t find any information about it on the web, so visit the article below to find out about what could have been. The case looks like a typical beige PC tower with a splash of color.

https://gitpi.us/article-archive/halo-hardware-to-top-mac-line/

The other product is a “20MB floppy disks roughly half the size of business cards” from Iomega that (as far as I can tell) never went into production. $20 for 20MB...

post photo preview
February 24, 2025
post photo preview
12% of Tech Workers Believe macOS is Based on Linux
Over 70% believe in at least one common Myth of Computer History.

The following data was derived from the 2025 Tech Industry Demographic Survey, which included over 12,000 respondents -- from across companies and organizations throughout the Tech Industry -- surveyed during February of 2025.

 

Ready to have your mind blown?

According to those surveyed:

  • Nearly 12% believe that macOS is based on Linux.
  • Over 70% believe in at least one common Myth of Computer History.
  • The most commonly believed myth (at 52%) is the myth that "the first computer bug was a real bug (a moth)".

 

Those who took the survey were presented with 6 common (but debunked) computer history myths... and were asked to select the myths which they believed to be true and factual historical statements.

Here is the breakdown of how many believed in each myth.

 

 

One rather fascinating piece of data: Those percentages held steady for nearly every demographic group within the survey.

For example:

Roughly 12% of respondents who prefer Linux, believe macOS is based on Linux.  The same was true of Windows users, C / C++ programmers, and those who perfer the Firefox Web Browser... no matter what sub-group was looked at... that number stayed roughly steady (around 12%).

The one outlier appeared when I looked at how many myths a person says they believe in... grouped by generic political leanings (Left, Centrist, or Right Leaning).

 

Notice that the percentage of respondents who "Believe at least one myth" or "Believes 4+ myths" stays roughly consistent (with only mild variances) across all three political groupings.

But, if you look at the "Believes 3+ myths" data, there is an 8% spike among those who identify as "Left Leaning".

While all surveyed were likely to believe at least one myth, "Left Leaning" respondents were slightly more likely to believe up to 3 myths (of the 6 presented).

 

The Myths of Computer History

 

For those curious, here are the 6 myths included in the survey (with links to debunk each of them).  

 

Read full Article
February 18, 2025
Lunduke's Birthday! Woo!

Wooo! Today is Lunduke’s birthday! Want to help celebrate this most excellent of holidays? Here’s some totally radical ideas!

1) Share some links to Lunduke Journal shows.

Bonus points if you share those shows to the type of places where people would get mad about it. 🤣

The “Open Source is Anti-Free Speech” video is a great choice. Just remember to take screenshots… because some sites will censor those links faster than you can blink (be sure to let me know if they do censor).

2) Grab a Subscription

Gotta keep the lights on here at The Lunduke Journal! And, shoot, there’s no better gift than the gift of Big-Tech-Free Journalism. 😎

Plus… for the rest of February there’s some massive discounts (like 50% off).

https://lunduke.locals.com/post/6661699/for-february-50-off-subscriptions-50-off-drm-free-downloads-lifetime-subscriptions-available

So, you know, win-win!

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go eat some BBQ. Because… birthday.

-Lunduke

 
Read full Article
February 13, 2025
For February: 50% off Subscriptions, 50% off DRM-Free Downloads, Lifetime Subscriptions available

2025 is off to an amazing start for The Lunduke Journal.

The number of people getting their Big-Tech-Free Tech News from The Lunduke Journal is shooting through the roof. Subscriptions (of every kind) are soaring.

And The Lunduke Journal is now available on a wide variety of platforms — with our core community area now consolidating on our own, self-hosted forum (which is exclusively available to subscribers).

With the tidal wave of new people — many of you wanting access to the new, exclusive Forum — I want to make it as easy as possible for everyone to become a part of what we are doing. Time to do something a bit crazy. Massive discounts on subscriptions (I mean… huge). For the entire month of February.

Yup. The whole gosh darned month.

If it’s February, the discounts below are all available. Choose whatever works best for you. Then feel awesome about supporting truly independent Tech Journalism.

50% Off Yearly Subscription:

50% off a Yearly subscription to The Lunduke Journal via both Locals and Substack. (This includes full access to the community Forum.)

That’s $2.25 per month. Pocket change.

50% Off DRM-Free, MP4 Downloads:

Want to be able to download every show The Lunduke Journal releases (and watch them on whatever device you like)? Yeah. You can do that. For 50% off.

Note: This DRM-Free download option does not include access to the Forum. This option is strictly for downloading the episodes.

The Famous Lifetime Subscription:

The "World Famous Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscription" is exactly what it sounds like. Pay once and get full access to The Lunduke Journal. For life. A great way to support Big-Tech-Free Journalism.

(This includes full access to the community Forum.)

New Lifetime Subscriptions are available, for $200, from now through February 28th.

The Lifetime Subscription can be obtain via Locals, Substack, or using Bitcoin. All three options work great and are super easy.

How to get a Lifetime Subscription via Locals:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Locals.com/support.

  2. Select "Give Once".

  3. Enter "200" into the amount field.

  4. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

How to get a Lifetime Subscription via Substack:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Substack.com/subscribe.

  2. Select the “Lifetime Subscription” option.

  3. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

If you would also like full, Lifetime access to Lunduke.Locals.com (which is included):

  1. Make a free account on Lunduke.Locals.com.

  2. Email “bryan at lunduke.com” with the email address you use on both Substack and Locals (can be different email addresses).

  3. Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status on Locals.

How to get a Lifetime Subscription with Bitcoin:

And, finally, you can obtain a Lifetime Subscription via Bitcoin. Save a few bucks with this option, as Bitcoin processing has fewer fees associated with it.

bc1qyjakve8fywm8pz2v99v57yhjj0vzr2vjze6fcq

  • Email "bryan at lunduke.com" with the following information: What time you made the transaction, how much was sent (in Bitcoin), and the email address you use (or plan to use) on Locals.com.

The Lunduke Journal would not be possible without your support. Every subscriber, of every type, makes a massive difference in bringing Big-Tech-Free Tech Journalism to the world.

Thank you.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals