Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Myth: "HTML was invented by Tim Berners-Lee"
The truth? He copied someone else's work.
April 10, 2024
post photo preview

Go to any search engine and type in, "Who invented HTML" and you'll -- almost always -- be given the following answer (or some variation on it):

"HTML was invented by Tim Berners-Lee."

Want to know a little secret?  That is utter hogwash.

"Heresy," you proclaim!  "Everyone knows Sir Tim Berners-Lee, who was knighted by the Queen and won of the Turing Award, created the HyperText Markup Language!  You better have some serious proof to backup such an outlandish claim!"

Challenge accepted.

To start with, let's look at a simple HTML document.

HTML.  I think?  Maybe?

Oh, wait.  Hold up.  I accidentally used the wrong screenshot.  That's not HTML... that's SGML.  A totally different language used several years before HTML.

Here.  Let me post an HTML screenshot.

Or is it the other way around?

Dagnabbit!  I did it again!  This time I accidentally posted a picture showing an HTML sample next to an SGML sample!

Funny.  They look exactly the same.

What the heck is SGML?

SGML -- the Standard Generalized Markup Language (aka ISO 8879) -- was set as a standard back in 1986... 7 years before the release of the HTML 1.0 specification.

Over in Switzerland, at CERN ("Conseil européen pour la Recherche nucléaire" aka "European Organization for Nuclear Research"), Anders Berglund adopted SGML primarily for usage in formatting documentation.

Title page of the CERN SGML User's Guide

That variation on SGML -- dubbed "SGMLguid" -- remained in usage at CERN for several years.  And, in 1987, Tim Berners-Lee was hired as a contractor at CERN.

Where, wouldn't you know it, part of Tim's job was using that CERN implementation of SGML.

A few years later, HTML was born.  Just to jog your memory, here is a document marked up in both Tim's HTML 1.0... and the CERN variant of SGML.

Mic drop.

Find the difference.  I dare ya.

Now, I'm not saying that Sir Tim Berners-Lee directly copied HTML from SGML (and the implementation that Anders Berglund made of it)... wait... yes.  Yes, I am.  I am saying exactly that.

HTML is a copy.

That's not entirely fair to Sir Tim.

In defense of Sir Tim, Knight of Her Majesty the Queen, he did do more than simply make a copy of SGML when "creating" HTML.

In fact, Sir Tim made three -- very important -- changes to SGML in order to make it HTML:

  1. He added the "a href" link tag.
  2. He changed the file extension from ".sgml" to ".html".
  3. He implemented an SGML parser which only implemented a little over a dozen tags from SGML... and ignored the rest.  And called it "HTML".

While item 1 (the HREF tag) is a noteworth change over SGML, items 2 and 3 (which are very real) only serve to reinforce the fact that HTML is -- for the most part -- simply a copy of an existing SGML implementation.  And a less functional one at that.

As an example, here is the very first HTML document ever written.  Which, other than the usge of HREF, is identical to SGML.

The very first HTML document, written by Sir Tim Berners-Lee - December 3rd, 1990

Change that "href" tag to something which SGML recognizes -- such as a different "Anchor" type (which is what the "a" stands for in "a href") -- and this instantly becomes a valid SGML document.

But... HyperText!  That's important!

While the addition of a standardized way of including simple looking HyperText Anchors (aka "links" or "a href") was a welcome addition to SGML... that was, at the time, the only significant change which Sir Tim implemented in his SGML copy known as HTML.

(Other than changing the file extension to ".html", of course.  That was pretty... important.  *cough*)

Back in the late 1980s, people were adding HyperText (and linking between "documents") everywhere.  Shoot.  Apple already had a fully graphical HyperText system known as HyperCard.

HyperCard 1.0

In fact, nearly every major On-Line service of the day included some form of linking between documents.

With the HyperText hype train fully underway -- across the entire computing universe -- it was only natural that any update to -- or copy of -- SGML would include that functionality.

So... yes.  Sir Tim Berners-Lee adding "HREF" to SGML was important.  But, otherwise, HTML was little more than a direct copy of existing work.

None of this is disputed.

These are historical facts that are well documented.  Shoot.  The W3C, itself, agrees with everything I said above.

So why, then, is this important to talk about any of this?

Because the getting history right is important.

The ridiculous myth that "Tim Beners-Lee invented HTML" has been repeated, over and over again, every single day... for decades... resulting in that myth becoming accepted as gospel truth.  With awards and acclaim (and even a knighthood) showered upon Sir Tim, in part, because of that myth.

The work which Tim Berners-Lee did on that initial HTML 1.0 release was -- to put it bluntly -- trivial.  At most.  Bordering on plagiarization.

The reality is... Tim stood on the backs of giants.  He wasn't simply inspired by others... he directly copied them.  To the point where Tim's work is almost indistinguishable (see the screenshots above) from the work which he copied (and is almost always attributed to him).

Some of the giants he stood on the backs of:

  • Anders Berglund (and his work on SGMLguid at CERN).
  • Charles Goldfarb, Edward Mosher and Raymond Lorie (the original creators of GML, upon which SGML was based -- note that "GML" was named after the first letters in their last names).
  • Ted Nelson and Douglas Engelbart for their early (1960s) work on HyperText systems.
  • And so many others.

Every single one of those names contributed something new and significant to the world of HyperText and Markup Languages.  They blazed new trails.

Sir Tim copied the existing SGML, changed the file extension, removed a few features, added an anchor tag (which was a feature everyone and their dog was doing at the time), and released it.

"Modifying a Work" vs "Claiming it as Your Own"

If I were to, for example, fork the Linux kernel -- change one line of code -- and release it as "NotLinuxWinkWink"... I can do that.  It's an open source project, and I can legally make modifications and release copies.

But, if I were to then receive near universal acclaim for inventing "NotLinuxWinkWink"... that's a problem.  Legality aside, that just wouldn't be right.  Or true.

Likewise, if I were to copy the specification for the C programming language... and change one line (or add one feature)... it would not be true to say that I "invented" a new language.  I tweaked something that already existed (that somebody else built).  A little.

Thus is the case with Sir Tim and HTML.

Was Sir Tim an instrumental figure in computing?  You bet.  Does he deserve a mention in the history books because of that?  Absolutely.  And in some positive ways, at that!

But did he "invent" HTML?  Not by a long shot.

And we need to stop repeating that myth.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
31
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
GNOME Foundation Has a New Executive Director! (And He's Not a Shaman!)

After years of chaos, financial uncertainty, and bizarre antics... has the GNOME Foundation finally hired a normal nerd to run the show?

00:14:07
50% Off Monthly, Yearly, & Lifetime Subscriptions (Through Friday, May 9th)

Let's make Big Tech grumpy. Let's get as many people subscribing to The Lunduke Journal as possible. Right now.

All the details on the discounts:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/50-off-monthly-yearly-subscriptions

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:15:11
Canonical (Ubuntu) Requiring Applicants Take "DEI and Belonging" Class

Want a job working on Ubuntu Linux? Be prepared to answer questions about "Equity Programs" and "ESG".

00:08:56
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
post photo preview
post photo preview

Just had a chat with the Side Scrollers Podcast (@SideScrollerPod). Partly about the “Adobe silences Tech Journalist” story… but we also dive into a bunch of stuff regarding Leftist Activists in Tech. And the CIA.

I join in around the 56 minute mark.

50% off Monthly, Yearly Subscriptions! Lifetime Subs for $100! Let's get everyone subscribing to The Lunduke Journal!

The number of free subscribers to The Lunduke Journal has absolutely exploded — across a bunch of platforms — which is truly amazing. The real Tech News is spreading farther than ever.

In fact, the free subscriber growth is so utterly massive, that if even a tiny fraction of you became a paying subscriber… The Lunduke Journal would become comfortably financially set for a very long time. Able to continue reporting on Big Tech — and corrupt Tech Foundations — well into the future.

All without taking a penny from Big Tech.

With that in mind, let’s do something awesome… something that will make Big Tech really grumpy.

Let’s get as many people subscribing to The Lunduke Journal as possible. Right now. This week. Let’s make this Big-Tech-Free, Non-Woke Tech News publication financially set for a good, long time.

To give everyone a kick-in-the-butt to help make that happen, I’m going to discount absolutely every type of subscription in a crazy way — through Friday, May 9th.

  • %50 off Monthly — Now $3 / Month (was $6 / Month)

  • %50 off Yearly — Now $27 / Year (was $54 / Year)

  • %50 off Yearly MP4 Downloads — Now $27 / Year (was $54 / Year)

  • %50 off Lifetime Subscriptions — Now $100 (was $200)

That Lifetime Subscription one is crazy.

Seriously. Make a one-time donation of $100, and be subscribed to The Lunduke Journal… for life. (This includes full access to the community Forum.)

If even 1% of the new free subscribers who have joined in the last month take advantage of this… The Lunduke Journal will be fully funded through the end of this year. And then some.

Let’s make it happen. Scroll down. Pick which ever subscription type works best for you. Then high-five yourself for making Big Tech grumpy.

Just be sure to do it by the end of the day on Friday, May 9th. The prices all go back to normal after that.

50% Off Yearly or Monthly Subscription:

50% off a Yearly or Monthly subscription to The Lunduke Journal are available via both Locals and Substack. (This includes full access to the community Forum.)

That means $3 / Month. Or $27 / Year (which works out to $2.25 / Month).

Via Lunduke.Locals.com:

Via Lunduke.Substack.com:

The Famous Lifetime Subscription:

The "World Famous Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscription" is exactly what it sounds like. Pay once and get full access to The Lunduke Journal. For life.

And now, through Friday, May 9th… you can snag one at a crazy discount. Normally these are $200… but you can grab one for $100. (You can also pay more if you’d like to donate a little extra.)

The Lifetime Subscription can be obtained via Locals, Substack, or using Bitcoin. All three options work great and are super easy. Scroll down and choose your option.

How to get a Lifetime Subscription via Locals:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Locals.com/support.

  2. Select "Give Once".

  3. Enter "100" (or more) into the amount field.

  4. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

How to get a Lifetime Subscription via Substack:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Substack.com/subscribe.

  2. Select the “Lifetime Subscription” option.

  3. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

If you would also like full, Lifetime access to Lunduke.Locals.com (which is included):

  1. Make a free account on Lunduke.Locals.com.

  2. Email “bryan at lunduke.com” with the email address you use on both Substack and Locals (can be different email addresses).

  3. Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status on Locals.

How to get a Lifetime Subscription with Bitcoin:

You can also obtain a Lifetime Subscription via Bitcoin.

bc1qyjakve8fywm8pz2v99v57yhjj0vzr2vjze6fcq

  • Email "bryan at lunduke.com" with the following information: What time you made the transaction, how much was sent (in Bitcoin), and the email address you use (or plan to use) on Locals.com or Substack.com.

50% Off DRM-Free, MP4 Downloads:

Want to be able to download every show The Lunduke Journal releases (and watch them on whatever device you like)? Yeah. You can do that. For 50% off.

Note: This DRM-Free download option does not include access to the Forum. This option is strictly for downloading the episodes.

Make a One Time Donation

Subscription not enough (or not your thing)? Want to toss in a one-time donation to The Lunduke Journal? There’s a few great options!

Via BitCoin:

Send any amount of BTC to the following address:

bc1qyjakve8fywm8pz2v99v57yhjj0vzr2vjze6fcq

  • Email "bryan at lunduke.com" with to let us know it was you! You can choose to keep your donation anonymous if you prefer. (Either way, all BTC donations get included in the matching deal.)

Via Locals:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Locals.com/support.

  2. Click “GIVE ONCE”.

  3. Enter any amount you like.

You Make This Possible

A huge thank you to all of the subscribers who have made The Lunduke Journal possible. Because of you, we have been able to do true Tech Journalism — to tell the stories that no other Tech News outlet has the cajones to touch.

And to all of you new Lunduke Journal subscribers: Welcome to the last bastion of truly independent, Big-Tech-Free, ad-free, non-Woke Tech Journalism.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
Lunduke Interviewed by Side Scrollers

Yesterday I joined the Side Scrollers show for an hour-long interview.

We covered the Adobe Copyright fight, PewDiePie and Linux, Pokemon Go and the CIA, and how The Lunduke Journal came to be. Definitely worth a watch. I join the show around the 56 minute mark.

 

Next Monday (May 12th), I’ll be a guest on Citizen Podcast with Dan Hollaway.

Critically Important Reminder: The Lunduke Journal refuses to take any funding from Big Tech. The coverage from The Lunduke Journal is only possible because of you.

And with efforts to silence The Lunduke Journal ramping up (including fraudulent copyright take-downs on YouTube), your support is needed more than ever before. If you haven’t already become a subscriber… there’s a lot of options.

All of them make a huge difference:

Without your support, so many stories about Big Tech and Woke Tech would never get told.

Seriously. Now’s the time to support this work, if you are able.

And a huge thank you to each and every one of you. You are making the Tech World a better place.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
Adobe silences Lunduke, "GNOME is Antifa", & Linux Leftists v. PewDiePie
The Lunduke Journal coverage for the week ending May 4th, 2025.

This has been one heck of a weird week — both for Open Source in general, and The Lunduke Journal in particular.

From GNOME contributors declaring that “GNOME is Antifa” to Open Source project leaders declaring that they intend to block PewDiePie fans from using Linux — because PewDiePie fans are, according to Open Source Leftists, “fascists”. Just plain weird.

And, of course, the saga of Adobe working to silence The Lunduke Journal continues to march forward.

As usual, most of these stories were not only broken by The Lunduke Journal… but most Tech News outlets have refused to cover them at all.

Highlights from the last week (ending Sunday, May 4th, 2025):

Those links are all to X — but you can also find all of these shows on every other platform where The Lunduke Journal is available (including Rumble, Podcast, YouTube, and the rest).

Reminder: The Lunduke Journal refuses to take any funding from Big Tech. This type of reporting is only possible through the support of all of you. There are a number of ways you can help out — and, big or small, every option goes directly towards funding this work.

Without your support, so many stories about Big Tech and Woke Tech would never get told.

Seriously. You make The Lunduke Journal possible.

Thank you.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals