Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Quick and Dirty: The story of 86-DOS & MS-DOS
The hardware and nerdy details that led to the first release of MS-DOS.
January 19, 2024
post photo preview

MS-DOS is one of the most successful operating systems of all time — absolutely dominating the computer industry for years.

Most of us have heard the tales of how MS-DOS came into existence: How Microsoft purchased it from another company, and how Microsoft licensed it to IBM.

But what are the nerdy details? What is the background? What hardware inspired the development of that MS-DOS precursor… and what did those machines actually look like?

Let’s take a few moments to dive a little deeper into the history of how MS-DOS truly came into existence. To tell this story, we’ll need to go back to the mid 1970s…

1974 - The Altair 8800 & the S-100 BUS

Way back in 1974, the legendary Altair 8800 computer was being designed. And, as part of the system, the S-100 computer bus was designed.

The Altair 8800
 

Fun Factoids: The Altair 8800 was based on an Intel 8080 CPU clocking in at a whopping 2 MHz and sold, as a kit, starting at $439. That base model came packed with 1024 bytes of RAM. Yeah. You read that right. 1k. In order to run the new “Altair BASIC” — which was the first product of Microsoft — you first needed to upgrade to 4k of RAM… which would run another $264.

That S-100 bus — which allowed a number of peripheral cards (memory, drive controllers, etc.) to be inserted into, and used by, the computer — became the first expansion bus standardized across the computer industry.

In fact, usage of the S-100 became incredibly common among a huge number of homebrew computers built far and wide — being the defacto bus type until the IBM PC hit the scene in 1981.

Many of these computer types (using a variety of processors, including the 8080 and Z80) received ports of the CP/M operating system, developed by Gary Kildall’s Digital Research. CP/M was everywhere back then.

1979 - Seattle Computer Product’s S-100 8086 kit

Seattle Computer Products (SCP) (which, as the name would suggest, was based near Seattle, WA) produced a number of S-100 related products — including memory cards such as the 64k RAM board shown below:

Photo courtesy s100computers.com
 

Seattle Computer Products then expanded to produce boards and kits to build S-100 bus based computers using the Intel 8086 CPU (which had just been released by Intel).

SCP’s 8086 S-100 card. This is a later variant (1980 or 1981) of the original 1979 version.
 

There was just one teensy-tiny problem… there was no available operating system to ship with these S-100 based 8086 systems.

Initially these SCP S-100 8086 computers shipped with no full-fledged operating system at all.

But, instead, they worked with another local company — Microsoft — to bundle a version of their BASIC language. The result was known as “BASIC-86” and it was, essentially, a BASIC interpreter and editor, that booted from disk on the new SCP 8086 systems.

This wasn’t the only product that the two companies worked together on. Microsoft had also hired SCP to design their “Z-80 Softcard” for the Apple II platform.

 

This relationship — between Seattle Computer Products and Microsoft — would become critical to the entire computer industry.

Sales of the SCP S-100 8086 boards struggled due to the lack of operating system. Turns out most people want an OS to go with their computer. Who knew?

To remedy this problem, SCP encouraged Gary Kildall to port his wildly popular CP/M operating system to 8086 board (which Kildall had already been working towards anyway). Unfortunately the CP/M port was not shipping fast enough to meet the needs of SCP.

They needed an Operating System. And fast.

1980 - Quick and Dirty DOS

Seattle Computer Products did the only logical thing… they began building their own Operating System.

In April of 1980, Tim Paterson began working on exactly that. Armed with the manuals for CP/M, he began building his own “CP/M-like” operating system — from scratch — in assembly for their 8086 platform.

This effort was called “Quick and Dirty Disk Operating System”… or “QDOS” for short.

QDOS was incredibly similar to CP/M — as the design was done based on the CP/M manuals — and a key goal was to allow easy porting of CP/M software to QDOS. That said, it did differ in some noteworthy ways:

  • CP/M cached file system information, which could cause data loss if an update was not manually performed before a user removed a disk. QDOS changed this by doing disk updates on every write to the drive. This resulted in QDOS disk operations being slower than CP/M… but also protected against data loss.

  • Instead of CP/M’s file system, Tim used the FAT system that Microsoft created for the standalone BASIC-86 that SCP had already been shipping with their S-100 8086 machies.

Fun Factoid: The FAT (File Allocation Table) file system was developed by Marc McDonald — the first full time employee of Microsoft — and first used as the file system for “Microsoft Standalone Disk BASIC-80” (a bootable floppy for 8080 CPU’s that contained a BASIC interpreter). That was later ported to 8086 and was bundled with Seattle Computer Products 8086 systems.

QDOS required the SCP S-100 8086 systems, naturally, with a specific floppy drive controller: the Cromemco 4FDC, as pictured below.

Photo courtesy s100computers.com
 

By July of 1980, QDOS was functional — with roughly half of the outlined feature set. Then, by August, the famous EDLIN command was added.

Factoid time! The EDLIN program, a simple line editor, is the most enduring portion of this original version of QDOS. Lasting until this day, in various forms and ports, and being the primary text editor for MS-DOS up until the early 1990s. It was inspired by the ED commands of both CP/M and UNIX.

During the summer of 1980, the name QDOS was dropped (as “Quick and Dirty” isn’t the best product name) in favor of the, rather on-the-nose, “86-DOS”. A DOS. On the 8086 platform.

Bellow are a few screenshots of 86-DOS from the 1.0 version, which didn’t ship until 1981 (but still gives a good view of what it looked like back then):

COMMAND.COM and EDLIN
 
A DIR of an 86-DOS system

And, for the sake of posterity, here is the first part of the 86-DOS user manual for version 0.3. This is the very first published description — ever — of the OS that would later become MS-DOS.

At this point, Seattle Computer Products could begin bundling their S-100 8086 systems with the, now functional, 86-DOS.

Below you can see an advertisement of exactly that. A complete computer with an 8086 @ 8 MHz, 128k of RAM, the disk controller mentioned above… and shipping with both 86-DOS and Microsoft’s 86-BASIC. For a mere $3,349.

Ad for the SCP S-100 in the November, 1981 issue of Kilobaud Microcomputing magazine.
 

1981 - The Microsoft Agreement

Remember how Microsoft and Seattle Computer Products had worked together a few times already? Well, they were about to make an agreement that would change all of computing for decades to come.

Starting in November/December of 1980, Microsoft licensed a version of 86-DOS (version 0.3 to be exact) from SCP. This was a non-exclusive deal, meaning SCP could still sell 86-DOS and license to other OEMs.

Amazingly enough, a copy of one of that license — dated January 6th, 1981 — is now available so we can know the exact terms of the deal:

Document copy, courtesy Archive.org
 

That’s when things really took off. At an almost lightning speed.

Just a few short months later — in May — Tim Paterson left SCP and started working directly for Microsoft. His job: to port 86-DOS to the new IBM PC, which had an 8088 processor.

Then, in July of 1981 (just two months later), Microsoft purchased 86-DOS — in entirety — for an additional $50,000 (over the $25,000 MS had previously paid for a non-exclusive license). It was now Microsoft’s to do with as they please… and the original developer now worked for them.

That very next month, in August, Microsoft officially licensed MS-DOS to IBM… who then bundled it with their new IBM Personal Computer (the famous model 5150)… renamed “PC-DOS”.

Something wild to think about: Consider the timeline here.

  • The IBM 5150 PC was announced on August 12th, 1981.

  • The deal between Microsoft and IBM — for MS-DOS, renamed to PC-DOS — was finalized… that same month.

  • Microsoft didn’t actually own MS-DOS… until a few weeks before that.

  • … and Microsoft didn’t even have the developer (Tim Paterson) working for them until two months before that.

That’s right. One of the most important business deals in computer history… came together in a matter of just a few short months… with only days to spare.

Epilogue

There is oh-so-much more to this story. Too much to tell in one sitting.

  • MS-DOS would go on to absolutely dominate the computer industry and set the course of Microsoft for decades to come.

  • That version of CP/M that Seattle Computer Products wanted (before they gave up waiting and built QDOS)? It eventually shipped in November of 1981. CP/M was this close to being shipped with the first IBM PCs. You can mark that moment as the point when CP/M lost its position of market dominance.

  • The relationship with IBM and Microsoft would be a wild and rocky one — involving PC-DOS, OS/2 and many other products over the years.

  • Tim Paterson would end up working at Microsoft, multiple times, on several versions of DOS as well as Visual BASIC.

Fun personal anecdote: As a young man in the 1990s, I started working at Microsoft. One day, it occurred to me: “I wonder if Tim Paterson still works here?”

 

So I looked him up and, turns out, he did. In a building just around the corner from the one I was working in. So I did what any presumptuous, nerdy 19 year old would do… I sent him an email. One where I sounded like a giddy fanboy. Because that’s what I was.

 

Tim was gracious and kind. Taking time out of his schedule to chat with a fan of his work. While we only spoke on a few occasions, those moments meant a great deal to this young nerd.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
6
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
September 07, 2024
Internet Archive Takes Another Step Towards Death

Archive.org loses appeal in book copyright case with the Sony / Universal Music lawsuit still looming on the horizon.

The Internet Archive Loses Appeal. As Expected.
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/6079435/the-internet-archive-loses-appeal-as-expected

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:30:58
Pop!_OS Lead: Linux Developers are “Patronizing Pedantic Megalomaniacs”

System76’s Principal Engineer doesn’t “even try to contribute to the Linux kernel anymore.”

The article:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/6052448/pop-os-lead-linux-developers-are-patronizing-pedantic-megalomaniacs

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:22:45
Zuck Regrets Censoring Facebook at Request of Democrats

"The White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire."

Warning: This show is extremely political. It has to be. There simply is no way to discuss the topic without being political. Just the same, the core of the topic is regarding the usability of digital, online publishing and messaging platforms -- a topic near and dear to the heart of those of us who have lived through the ages of the BBS, Usenet, Geocities, and the like.

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:40:29
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

Sometimes, you never know what you're going to find, when you go outside. I went for a walk today, and there was a sidewalk sale outside one of the homes near where I live. One of the items for sale: A Dell Inspiron 3000 (Pentium MMX 200mhz) with 80MB ram, and a 2GB hard drive for £75. I figured "ah, what the heck, why not?"

Huzzah! It's in PERFECT WORKING ORDER! The only thing wrong with it, is the same thing that happened to all Dell batteries back then: it's drains normally until about 30%, and then just unceremoniously SHUTS DOWN. So, you kind of have to use the power supply to be safe.

The dilemma I face: Do I leave Windows ME on this thing? Or, do I replace it, with maybe FreeDOS or a copy of Windows 98 or something else?

It came with Office 97, which has the original CLIPPY! Would be a shame to blow that away. Also, it has a working copy of Cakewalk! I haven't seen Cakewalk in decades. I'd lose that too.

Still, It would be fun to see if I could get the BT Wifi PCMCIA card...

2 hours ago

Hyprland 0.43.0 is out.

Looks like there are a lot of developers working on dozens of bugs and features. It is impressive the team of ordinary developers this project has attracted. That said, it is impossible to summarize such a large list of updates, fixes, and new features. So, here are a couple categories of updates and fixes:

  • Keyboard control,
  • command line apps,
  • tiling windows in a multi screen and resolution environment, and
  • Wayland / X compatibility.

This list is extensive, and I can't wait to test it out. If you're a fan or just curious, it might be time to get the Hyprland ecosystem a spin.

https://github.com/hyprwm/Hyprland/releases/tag/v0.43.0

Well, it's not like we didn't see THIS coming from a mile away:

https://www.boredpanda.com/family-poisoned-ai-generated-mushroom-identification-book/

What's especially fascinating, is that this article itself sounds like it was partially written by cobbling together the responses to several AI prompts:

post photo preview
September 07, 2024
post photo preview
Funny Programming Pictures Part LIV
The Roman Numerals makes ‘em fancy.

Fun fact: I hit CTRL-C at least 7 times when copying each of these pictures.

You know.  Just to be sure.

You're welcome.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read full Article
September 04, 2024
post photo preview
Mount a drive image from a remote server... on DOS.
Want your D:\ to point to an image running on a Linux box across the world? Yeah, you do.

I'm a sucker for software which makes aging operating systems more useful.  As such, I am absolutely enamored with a new DOS utiltity called "mTCP NetDrive".

What is NetDrive?

"NetDrive is a DOS device driver that allows you to access a remote disk image hosted by another machine as though it was a local device with an assigned drive letter. The remote disk image can be a floppy disk image or a hard drive image."

Yeah.  Mount -- read and write -- a drive image remotely (anywhere in the world).  From DOS.

 

 

mTCP -- a suite of networking tools for DOS (like Ping, a DHCP client, an FTP client, etc.) -- has been around for a long time.  The developer, Michael Brutman, has truly done a phenomenal job building and mainting all of those tools.

But NetDrive really turns things up to 11.

  • You can place disk image on a server (remote or local) and mount it from any DOS machine.  The whole thing uses UDP.
  • The DOS driver uses less than 6 KB of RAM.  Keeping driver overhead low on DOS machines is important.
  • The drive images are simple raw disk images -- which means we can mount and manipulate them easily.
  • You can even mount multiple images at once -- from multiple different servers.

Oh!  The server is a lightweight application that runs (with no need for root access) on Linux or Windows.  Want to host your DOS images on a Raspberry Pi?  Yes.  You do.

 

 

What's more, the local DOS system simply recognizes the mounted drive as a standard hard drive (mounted as a configurable drive letter).  Which means that just about any software should work on it without difficulty.

Even disk management and optimization tools, like Norton Utilities, work fantastically.

 

 

As you can imagine, using NetDrive over the Internet can get a bit pokey.  Especially on a less-than-speedy connection.  But over a local network?  The darn thing runs at a very usable speed.

And -- even with potential speed issues when running on a remote server -- I absolutely love the idea of having a set of DOS drive images which I can mount from anywhere.  Heck.  I could even share some of those images with friends -- to use as a sort of DOS repository.

The developer has even added features like "undo" and "checkpoints" to make it easy to roll back "woopsies".  On a DOS drive image.  Mounted on a remote server.

Come on.

That's just nifty.

Read full Article
September 05, 2024
post photo preview
The Internet Archive Loses Appeal. As Expected.
With more legal action on the horizon, how long before Archive.org closes?

The United States Court of Appeals (Second Circuit) just issued a ruling against the Internet Archive (Archive.org) -- rejecting their appeal, and upholding a previous ruling against them in the Hachette vs Internet Archive legal battle.

Make no mistake: This is very bad news for both the Internet Archive, Archive.org users, as well as other archival projects.

 

 

 

Hachette v. Internet Archive: The Short, Short Version

 

To make sure everyone is up to speed, here is the short, short version of this legal battle.

For many years, the Internet Archive has been creating digital copies of physical books (by scanning them) -- then allowing people to "borrow" those digital versions from Archive.org (in theory limiting the total digital books being "lent out" to the count of the physical books in the Archive's possession).

They never obtained permissions from the authors or publishers to do any of this.

In 2020, during the Covid lockdowns, the Internet Archive launched the "National Emergency Library" -- where they removed that "1 physical book : 1 digital book lent out" restriction.  Meaning anybody on the Internet could obtain digital scans of physical books... and the Archive could "Lend Out" an unlimited number of digital copies based on a single physical copy.

Again.  No permission was obtained from the writers or publishers.

Thus -- to the surprise of absolutely nobody -- the "Hachette v. Internet Archive" legal battle began.

And... The Internet Archive lost.  The judge ruled in favor of the publishers (including Hachette, Wiley, Penguin Random House, & HarperCollins).

Naturally, Internet Archive appealed that ruling.  But, boy-howdy, was their appeal a strange one which was destined to fail.

 

The Strange Appeal of The Internet Archive

 

On April 19th of 2024, the Internet Archive filed their final brief in their attempt to appeal this ruling against them.

In that ruling, one of the Internet Archive's core arguments was that it cost the Internet Archive a lot of money to make so many digital copies of books without permission... so, therefore, the Internet Archive should be allowed to do it.

That is neither a joke nor an exaggeration.  It sounds weird, because it is weird.

The Internet Archive truly attempted to make the case that spending a lot of money committing a crime... should make that crime legal.  (Could you imagine the mafia making that case?  Wild.)

You can read the full analysis, by The Lunduke Journal, of the appeal (including the appeal itself) for yourself for more details.

The reality is... there was never any chance that the Internet Archive's attempted appeal was going to be successful.  Their defensive arguments were highly illogical (bordering on flights of fancy), and brought nothing new or noteworthy to the case.  This was all painfully obvious.

 

The Lost Appeal

 

On Wednesday, September 4th, 2024, the opinion was handed down from the United States Court of Appeals.

While the full ruling is roughly 64 pages long, this single paragraph -- from the second page -- summarizes things quite well:

 

"This appeal presents the following question: Is it “fair use” for a nonprofit organization to scan copyright-protected print books in their entirety, and distribute those digital copies online, in full, for free, subject to a one-to-one owned-to-loaned ratio between its print copies and the digital copies it makes available at any given time, all without authorization from the copyright-holding publishers or authors? Applying the relevant provisions of the Copyright Act as well as binding Supreme Court and Second Circuit precedent, we conclude the answer is no. We therefore AFFIRM."

 

To call out the truly important parts:

"Question: Is it 'fair use' ... to scan copyright-protected print books in their entirety, and distribute those digital copies online, in full, for free ... all without authorization from the copyright-holding publishers or authors? ... we conclude the answer is no."

You can read the entire 64 page ruling for yourself.  Heck.  You can even read it on Archive.org.  But that line, right there, sums it all up.

Naturally, the Internet Archive has issued a statement.  Albeit... a short one.

 

"We are disappointed in today’s opinion about the Internet Archive’s digital lending of books that are available electronically elsewhere. We are reviewing the court’s opinion and will continue to defend the rights of libraries to own, lend, and preserve books."

 

What Happens Now?

 

The Internet Archive gets sued by some of the biggest book publishers... and loses.

The Internet Archive appeals... and loses.

What happens next?  Well.  Unfortunately -- for both the Internet Archive, and its users -- the future looks rather bleak.

First and foremost: Has the Internet Archive made, and distributed, digital copies of work you own?  This ruling will certainly not hurt your case should you decide to take legal action against Archive.org.

And -- holy smokes -- the amount of copyrighted material on Archive.org is absolutely massive.

The Archive.org software repository alone contains millions of items.  With a very large number of them being copyrighted material, posted there without permission of the copyright owner.

Simply going by the numbers, here's how much material is available on Archive.org (roughly):

  • 832 Billion archived webpages.
  • 38 Million printed materials (magazines, books, etc.).
  • 2.6 Million pieces of software
  • 11.6 Million videos files.
  • 15 Million audio files.
  • 4.7 Million images.

How many of those items do you think are there without permission (or possibly even knowledge) of the owners or creators?

Every single one now has an increasingly strong case when looking at potential legal action.

And it's about to get even worse for the Internet Archive.

 

UMG Recordings v. Internet Archive

 

That's right, the book publishers weren't the only ones taking legal action against Archive.org. 

Universal Music Group and Sony have an ongoing lawsuit against the Internet Archive -- regarding the distribution of 2,749 audio recordings (with potential damages upwards of $412 Million USD).

Seriously.

 

"Plaintiffs bring this suit to address Defendants’ massive ongoing violation of Plaintiffs’ rights in protected pre-1972 sound recordings. As part of what Defendants have dubbed the “Great 78 Project,” Internet Archive, Blood, and GBLP have willfully reproduced thousands of Plaintiffs’ protected sound recordings without authorization by copying physical records into digital files. Internet Archive then willfully uploaded, distributed, and digitally transmitted those illegally copied sound recordings millions of times from Internet Archive’s website."

 

Sound familiar?  Digital copies.  No permission from the artists or publishers.  Free downloads for everyone.

Naturally, the Internet Archive attempted to have this suit dismissed... but their attempt was denied in May of 2024.  (Because if there's one constant in life... it's that the Internet Archive always loses in court.)  That case is going forward.

 

 

What happens if the Internet Archive loses this UMG / Sony case?  What happens if they are ordered to pay $412 Million in damages?

To put it simply: Archive.org doesn't have that kind of money.  They bring in roughly $20 Million (give or take) per year.  That type of legal liability would absolutely destroy the Internet Archive.

 

 

And, here's the thing, the Internet Archive is almost assuredly going to lose that lawsuit as well.

Regardless of what you, I, or anyone else thinks of the Internet Archive -- and, make no mistake, I use that service several times a week (and love it) -- the law here is incredibly clear and well tested.

The Internet Archive runs one of the largest (if not the largest) website of pirated and stolen digital material on the planet.  Sure, it may also provide extremely valuable (and often, very legal) services as well.. but that doesn't make those crimes go away.

With each legal defeat, the Internet Archive grows increasingly vulnerable to additional attacks.

Simply being logical about it... it seems highly likely that we'll see additional suits brought against the Internet Archive in the months ahead.  Books, music, TV shows, software... Archive.org contains a massive mountain of copyrighted material in all areas.  These are suits which the Internet Archive would be almost certain to lose.

With this reality looming, how long until Archive.org will be forced to shut down entirely?  That day is likely not far off... and a sad day it will be.

 

The Archive Had to Know This Was Coming

 

The truly sad part?  The leadership of the Internet Archive had to know exactly what they were doing.

Every step of the way, it was obvious that they were going to lock horns with publishers (and lose).

Heck, I told them.  Repeatedly.

But, even if The Lunduke Journal hadn't pointed this out... it was a brutally obvious certainty to anyone even mildly familiar with copyright law and the workings of Archive.org.

Which means: The Internet Archive knowingly put their entire service at risk (including the Wayback Machine, the massive archive or pre-copyright audio recordings, etc.) because they wanted to publish copyrighted material against the wishes of the authors or publishers.

Despite this, they continue to push a public perception campaign where they pretend that publishers and authors are burning their own books.  When the reality is... the books are still available a wide variety of ways.  Archive.org simply got in trouble for copying and distributing them without permission.

 

 

Something I find truly fascinating about all of this, is that The Lunduke Journal will -- as usual -- get yelled at (rather extensively) for this article.  For simply pointing out the current reality of copyright law and how the Internet Archive has, knowingly, violated it.

People love Archive.org.  Heck, I love Archive.org.

And people are allowing their love for that website to convince them that anyone being critical of it... must, necessarily, be bad and evil.  An enemy.

But it is not The Lunduke Journal who is putting The Internet Archive in danger of being shut down.

Neither is it Sony, Hachette, Random House, or HarperCollins who are putting The Internet Archive in danger.

No, sir.

The only one putting The Internet Archive in danger... is The Internet Archive.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals