Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Who really coined the term 'Open Source'?
The story you've heard is wrong.
August 10, 2023
post photo preview

Nowadays, “Open Source” is a well understood, widely used concept. Everyone who works within the software development world understands what it means.

But… who coined the term? Who is the first person to actually use the phrase “open source” in reference to software? Let's dive into some of the (sometimes conflicting) statements from multiple people… and what the reality actually looks like.

Was it Eric S Raymond or Bruce Perens? (Who, together, founded the Open Source Initiative in 1998.) Or, perhaps, Richard Stallman? Turns out… not any of those guys. At least not initially.

Let's start with the accepted origin of the term by the Open Source Initiative… and then dig further into the past... and why the Open Source Initiative is very, very wrong.

February 5, 1998 - Christine Peterson

In a recounting of a meeting, held on Feb 5, 1998, Christine Peterson of the Foresight Institute was attending a meeting with the likes of Eric S Raymond and Jon “maddog” Hall.

During that meeting, according to a recounting by Peterson, the topic turned to terminology. What phrase should be used for what we all now understand as “open source”?

A few options were floated – such as “freely distributable”, “cooperatively developed”, and “sourceware”. Christine Peterson recals that she was “the originator of the term ‘open source software’” and “between meetings that week, I was still focused on the need for a better name and came up with the term ‘open source software.’ While not ideal, it struck me as good enough.”

Peterson mentioned the phrase to Todd Anderson, who then mentioned it during the meeting. Peterson allowed the rest of the members of that 1998 meeting to come to their consensus on it.

Eric S Raymond, in response to this, stated the following:

“Chris's account matches my recollections in every respect and reminds me of some details I had forgotten. I fully endorse it.

 

I can add that it was indeed I who explicitly brought up terminology as an issue. I had a clearer initial sense than others there (though they did catch up with me later) that we were in effect planning a marketing and branding campaign. That sense was driving my thinking, and continued to do so for months afterwards. But it was something I didn't talk about much because I knew “marketing” was a bad word to these died-in-the-wool geeks, something they'd need to get used to thinking about gradually. I'd had to struggle with the concept myself before making peace with it.

 

The only other important thing this account leaves out is something Chris didn't know because she couldn't read my mind. The truth is that I spotted “open source” as the winner we were looking for almost immediately, the first or maybe second time it came up, well before I started advocating for it later in the discussion.

 

You see, I too was feeling like it was important not to step on the discussion, better to allow a consensus to develop without me forcing it. But I spotted the useful connection to “open source” as used in intelligence work immediately and was more excited than I let on. It seemed perfect for our propaganda needs - ideologically neutral, easily parsed, just enough connection to a respectable and established term of art. I was very impressed with Chris for inventing it.

 

I actually felt a considerable sense of relief when the other participants gravitated to the term. I would have fought for it over the alternatives on offer, but didn't have to. Bright crowd at that meeting; I was ahead of the curve only because I had put concentrated thought into the problems before I walked in. We all figured out what needed to be done, and we did it.

 

Ever since I was first reminded that “open source” was Chris's coinage I've been careful to credit it to her. She deserves her happy twinge. Maybe I would have come up with the same term or something as good myself, maybe not - it's good that we didn't have to roll those dice.”

But.

Was that really the first time the phrase “open source” was used in reference to software?

Turns out… no.

It, absolutely was not.

Let's go back further.

September 10, 1996 - Caldera

Two years earlier, in 1996, Caldera had acquired a number of assets from Novell. This included DR-DOS, CP/M, and many others originally created by Digital Research (helmed by the late, great Gary Kildall).

On Sep 10, 1996, Caldera released the source code for DR-DOS. The headline for the press release reads as follows:

“CALDERA. ANNOUNCES OPEN SOURCE CODE MODEL FOR DOS”

Going on to say:

“Caldera believes an open source code model benefits the industry in many ways.”

Clearly the phrase “open source” was in common usage (at least among some groups or companies) back in 1996.

But what about… earlier than that?

August 19, 1993 - Jerome (Jerry) Schneider

In a 1993 USENET post (to comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32), Jerome Schneider made the following statement:

“Anyone else into “Source Code for NT”? The tools and stuff I'm writing for NT will be released with source. If there are “proprietary” tricks that MS wants to hide, the only way to subvert their hoarding is to post source that illuminates (and I don't mean disclosing stuff obtained by a non-disclosure agreement). Open Source is best for everyone in the long run.

In a posting entirely about the goodness of releasing source code… it is refered to directly as “Open Source” (with capital first letters). Clearly, we're back to at least 1993 as a commonly used term... a term that was felt to be so obvious and common that it didn't need further explanation.

December 4, 1990 - Kent, the man from xanth

In December of 1990 a post was made to two USENET newsgroups (comp.sys.amiga and alt.religion.computers) that contained the following line:

“BSD's open source policy meant that user developed software could be ported among platforms”

The author was… “Kent, the man from xanth”.

Seriously.

But… can we go back… further?

October 10, 1989 - Chris Mc Donald

October. 1989. Another USENET post (this time to comp.virus) contains the following:

“I am struck by the lack of any reference to Virus-L, RISKS Forum and other INTERNET services which have for years provided we users the best available, open source information on the subject of computer viruses.”

That one feels iffy to me. Could have been interpreted a few different ways. So, let's continue digging back through time.

February, 1987 - The NSA

In a 1990 USENET post (to sci.crypt) by Tony Patti (editor of “Cryptosystems Journal”), there is a reference to a February 1987 document, being obtained via the Freedom of Information Act, which contains the following:

“Although software was developed from open source material, the application of that information into the subject software program contains cryptographic capabilities that are controlled under category 13B.”

Tony Patti, who published that snippet, goes on to say:

“My primary concern is that those policies must comply with the U.S. Constitution and thereby allow the free dissemination of open-source/published material – including software (ESPECIALLY FREE SOFTWARE) which is developed directly from published algorithms.”

Now. Internal usage of the phrase “open source” within the NSA might be confirmed as early as 1987.

What this shows, in far more certainty, is a common understanding of the term as early as May 11th of 1990 (the date of the USENET post from Tony Patti).

So. Who coined the term?

The question of “Who coined the phrase Open Source” is still difficult to answer. But we can, fairly definitively, say this much we know:

  • The first known usage of the phrase (in context) by a company would be Caldera in 1996.

  • The first known usage of the phrase (in context) by an individual / journalist would be May of 1990 by Tony Patti.

  • The first known potential usage of the phrase (in context) by a government agency might be the NSA in 1987.

Could there be earlier references than these? It's possible. But, after some exhausting digging, this is as far back as I (and others) seem to be able to go.

One thing is absolutely certain: The term was definitely not created in 1998 by Christine Peterson.

August 9th, 2023 Update

This article was originally published back in November of 2021.

The Open Source Initiative, whose leadership has seen this article, continues -- to the present day -- to push the false story of the term being coined in 1998 by Christine Peterson.

Why?  They know, without a doubt, that the phrase dated back far earlier than 1998.  Yet they cling, almost desperately, to their provably false tale.  How weird is that?

What on Earth could they possibly gain by trying to change history in this way?  It boggles the mind.

Details like this are important.  Getting our history -- the history of Computers -- factually correct is important.  Because we love computers.  And making up false histories about them just makes no sense at all.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
6
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
End of the Internet? Dead Internet Theory + Disappearing Content = Rut Roh

The Internet is mostly made by AI... but that's ok, it's all being deleted anyway.

00:28:24
The Future of Computing: A.I. and Advocacy. ...Seriously?

Microsoft, Firefox maker Mozilla, & Red Hat envision a future where computers are focused on Artificial Intelligence & Political Advocacy (and Activism). Where do others, like Apple & Ubuntu, stand?

00:28:46
The Open Source Community is Neither "Open" nor a "Community"

Other words that don't describe the Open Source World: Free, Democracy, Welcoming, Inclusive, Honest.

00:32:04
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
post photo preview

News fast update!

Last weekend, on what was pretty much a dare, I decided to not look at any "news" for the week. I signed out of all social media, except for FB and Discord. I'm in a couple motorcycle groups on FB that revolve around the Mid-Atlantic Backcountry Discovery Route. I just looked at that, and didn't even load up the main feed. Discord just for chat, though I even kept that to a minimum. I didn't click through anything that even remotely looked like news. I didn't go to Slashdot or CNN or Fox or the orange site, any of it. I skipped the current affairs people I follow on Youtube.

I didn't watch or read any of Bryan's new stuff. Heck, the only time I even signed into Locals was when I accidentally fired up the Android app, which I promptly closed. (I was trying to open my banking app and it's right beside Locals.)

In other words, I currently don't have a clue about anything. I see there's a new Q&A. I'ma go watch it now.

Going forward, I think a lot of what I...

A few days back @Lunduke shared a screenshot of his Mac desktop. While desktop customization is really limited on macOS, I've found if you get creative, you can make it a pretty unique looking system despite Apple's best efforts. I submit to court, exhibits A, B, and C. The wallpaper is from Unsplash. The browser is Brave with a theme from the Chrome Web Store. My preferred theme (Halo - Ghosts of Reach) wouldn't install because Microsoft did something to make it only work on Edge 🙄, but I thought this one was pretty slick too. The terminal emulator in the photo is the built in macOS Terminal with the Silver Aerogel profile and the text color changed to white. The other browser photo is LibreWolf with Purple Prism theme from the Firefox Addons site. This one is closer to the Ghosts of Reach theme, and I prefer it to the one I'm using on Brave. Anyway, I just figured I'd show that you can actually make a pretty unique looking desktop on a Mac. It's not perfect, but it's ...

post photo preview
Last week at The Lunduke Journal (May 19 - May 25, 2024)
Open Source! The Future of Computing! The End of the Internet! Yowza, what a week!

We tackled some pretty big topics last week!  The nature of "The Open Source Community", the future of computing (according to "the powers that be"), and the... end of the Internet?  Yikes.  Intense stuff!

Luckily, we ended the week with various nerdy goofiness.  You know.  To cleanse the palate.

Oh!  Have I thanked all of The Lunduke Journal subscribers yet today?  No?  Well, gosh darn it, I should!  You amazing nerds make all of this possible.

The Videos

The Articles

Previous Few Weeks

And, would you look at that?  A new week is about to begin!  If the past is a good indictor of the future... better buckle up, Buttercup!  This next week is gonna be a fun ride!

Read full Article
post photo preview
Instantly Become an Elite Movie Hacker
(with 3 simple tools)

Feeling lazy?  Want anyone who happens to walk past your computer screen to think you are incredibly busy writing — or compiling — a mountain of code?

Filming a movie about a squad of elite hackers and need the computer screens to... you know... look the part?

Or, heck, are you just a bit bored and want to make your computer do something funky looking?

Whichever situation you find yourself in, here are three different tools that will make your computer appear like it is hard at work doing some seriously elite hacking and coding.

1 - Genact

Genact is described as a “nonsense activity generator”. And boy does it do its job well.

Pretend to be busy or waiting for your computer when you should actually be doing real work! Impress people with your insane multitasking skills. Just open a few instances of Genact and watch the show. Genact has multiple scenes that pretend to be doing something exciting or useful when in reality nothing is happening at all.

Runs on Linux, Windows, and Mac… and creates screens like this:

Compiling!

 

Memory Dumping!

 

Download-inating!

Genact has a whole boatload of different modules to help you pretend to do a bunch of different things: Mining crypto, handling docker images, compiling kernels, viewing logs… it’s all here.

2 - Hollywood

Hollywood is a Linux-only option, and it looks oh-so-cool. It runs in a terminal, and opens up a whole bunch of different applications (mostly real performance and network monitoring tools) each of which displays constantly updating bits of information.

The whole point is to make your computer look super busy… and super hacker-y. Just like in a movie.

In fact, Hollywood looks so good that it’s been used in multiple TV shows.

For example, here it is in a segment for NBC Nightly News:

So much elite hacker-y-ness!

Yeah. The news. A fake “make your computer look like it’s hacking something” application. On the news. If that’s not a great representation of the sorry state of TV News, I don’t know what is.

Just for the sake of completeness… here’s a shot of two investigators -- from that news report -- pointing to the random, gibberish output of Hollywood… and pretending like it’s super fascinating, real data that is somehow relevant to the news segment.

"Hmm.  Yes.  My elite hacker brain is thinking about this very real hacker stuff on this computer screen.  Look!  Right there!  Hacker stuff!"

That is, I kid you not, absolutely real.  This was on the news.

And here’s Hollywood in a sketch on Saturday Night Live:

"Don't interrupt me!  Can't you see I'm hacking!"

Seriously.  Hollywood is tons of fun to play with.  Even if you're not filming a news report.

3 - HackerTyper.net

HackerTyper.net is a bit different than the other ones.

Here’s how it works:

  1. Open up HackerTyper.net.

  2. Start hitting keys on the keyboard. Any keys at all. Doesn’t matter.

  3. Perfectly formatted C code appears on the screen!

Alloc's and Struct's and Int's!  Huzzah!

Now you can write code just like actors in the movies! Just sit back and pound away at your keyboard -- like a deranged, drunken monkey -- with complete disregard for what keys you’re actually pressing!

Whichever of these three options you choose -- HackerTyper, Hollywood, or Genact -- you are now fully equiped to become the most elitest of elite movie hackers.  (You're even ready to be on the evening news.)

Read full Article
post photo preview
Funny Programming Pictures Part XLI
That's, like, 41 in normal, non-fancy numbers.

Behold!  Pictures... from... the Internet!

 

Dangit, Bilbo!  Knock it off!

 

I would... still apply the .gitignore rules.  ... right?  I think?

 

HTTP jokes are all the rage these days.

 

According to every PM and Scrum Master I've ever worked with, this is true.

 

False.  Five months.

 

The Amazon Shareholders would like to thank you for your contribution.

 

It's totally normal for the value of a currency to fluxuate by 10% every day.  At random.  Wink wink.

 

You think a measly garage door is going to stop Flanders from asking you about LLM's?

 

Ok.  This one's not about programming or computers.  But.  You know.  Think about it.

 

This comic is highly misleading.  In real life, the "issues" bag is roughly twice the size.  Also the corporation stole the tree.

 

Can't argue with that.

 

He he.  Still one of my favorites.

 

I should make a rule about this within The Lunduke Journal.  Anyone who mentions "AI" has to drop a quarter in the tip jar.  I'd be rich!  Rich, I say!

 

Dagnabbit.

 

I'm not saying Infrastructure guys are pansies nowadays.  But they're pansies nowadays.

 

Yup.

 

It takes screenshots of your mouth.

 

You see... because they have small brains.
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals