Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Who really coined the term 'Open Source'?
The story you've heard is wrong.
August 10, 2023
post photo preview

Nowadays, “Open Source” is a well understood, widely used concept. Everyone who works within the software development world understands what it means.

But… who coined the term? Who is the first person to actually use the phrase “open source” in reference to software? Let's dive into some of the (sometimes conflicting) statements from multiple people… and what the reality actually looks like.

Was it Eric S Raymond or Bruce Perens? (Who, together, founded the Open Source Initiative in 1998.) Or, perhaps, Richard Stallman? Turns out… not any of those guys. At least not initially.

Let's start with the accepted origin of the term by the Open Source Initiative… and then dig further into the past... and why the Open Source Initiative is very, very wrong.

February 5, 1998 - Christine Peterson

In a recounting of a meeting, held on Feb 5, 1998, Christine Peterson of the Foresight Institute was attending a meeting with the likes of Eric S Raymond and Jon “maddog” Hall.

During that meeting, according to a recounting by Peterson, the topic turned to terminology. What phrase should be used for what we all now understand as “open source”?

A few options were floated – such as “freely distributable”, “cooperatively developed”, and “sourceware”. Christine Peterson recals that she was “the originator of the term ‘open source software’” and “between meetings that week, I was still focused on the need for a better name and came up with the term ‘open source software.’ While not ideal, it struck me as good enough.”

Peterson mentioned the phrase to Todd Anderson, who then mentioned it during the meeting. Peterson allowed the rest of the members of that 1998 meeting to come to their consensus on it.

Eric S Raymond, in response to this, stated the following:

“Chris's account matches my recollections in every respect and reminds me of some details I had forgotten. I fully endorse it.

 

I can add that it was indeed I who explicitly brought up terminology as an issue. I had a clearer initial sense than others there (though they did catch up with me later) that we were in effect planning a marketing and branding campaign. That sense was driving my thinking, and continued to do so for months afterwards. But it was something I didn't talk about much because I knew “marketing” was a bad word to these died-in-the-wool geeks, something they'd need to get used to thinking about gradually. I'd had to struggle with the concept myself before making peace with it.

 

The only other important thing this account leaves out is something Chris didn't know because she couldn't read my mind. The truth is that I spotted “open source” as the winner we were looking for almost immediately, the first or maybe second time it came up, well before I started advocating for it later in the discussion.

 

You see, I too was feeling like it was important not to step on the discussion, better to allow a consensus to develop without me forcing it. But I spotted the useful connection to “open source” as used in intelligence work immediately and was more excited than I let on. It seemed perfect for our propaganda needs - ideologically neutral, easily parsed, just enough connection to a respectable and established term of art. I was very impressed with Chris for inventing it.

 

I actually felt a considerable sense of relief when the other participants gravitated to the term. I would have fought for it over the alternatives on offer, but didn't have to. Bright crowd at that meeting; I was ahead of the curve only because I had put concentrated thought into the problems before I walked in. We all figured out what needed to be done, and we did it.

 

Ever since I was first reminded that “open source” was Chris's coinage I've been careful to credit it to her. She deserves her happy twinge. Maybe I would have come up with the same term or something as good myself, maybe not - it's good that we didn't have to roll those dice.”

But.

Was that really the first time the phrase “open source” was used in reference to software?

Turns out… no.

It, absolutely was not.

Let's go back further.

September 10, 1996 - Caldera

Two years earlier, in 1996, Caldera had acquired a number of assets from Novell. This included DR-DOS, CP/M, and many others originally created by Digital Research (helmed by the late, great Gary Kildall).

On Sep 10, 1996, Caldera released the source code for DR-DOS. The headline for the press release reads as follows:

“CALDERA. ANNOUNCES OPEN SOURCE CODE MODEL FOR DOS”

Going on to say:

“Caldera believes an open source code model benefits the industry in many ways.”

Clearly the phrase “open source” was in common usage (at least among some groups or companies) back in 1996.

But what about… earlier than that?

August 19, 1993 - Jerome (Jerry) Schneider

In a 1993 USENET post (to comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32), Jerome Schneider made the following statement:

“Anyone else into “Source Code for NT”? The tools and stuff I'm writing for NT will be released with source. If there are “proprietary” tricks that MS wants to hide, the only way to subvert their hoarding is to post source that illuminates (and I don't mean disclosing stuff obtained by a non-disclosure agreement). Open Source is best for everyone in the long run.

In a posting entirely about the goodness of releasing source code… it is refered to directly as “Open Source” (with capital first letters). Clearly, we're back to at least 1993 as a commonly used term... a term that was felt to be so obvious and common that it didn't need further explanation.

December 4, 1990 - Kent, the man from xanth

In December of 1990 a post was made to two USENET newsgroups (comp.sys.amiga and alt.religion.computers) that contained the following line:

“BSD's open source policy meant that user developed software could be ported among platforms”

The author was… “Kent, the man from xanth”.

Seriously.

But… can we go back… further?

October 10, 1989 - Chris Mc Donald

October. 1989. Another USENET post (this time to comp.virus) contains the following:

“I am struck by the lack of any reference to Virus-L, RISKS Forum and other INTERNET services which have for years provided we users the best available, open source information on the subject of computer viruses.”

That one feels iffy to me. Could have been interpreted a few different ways. So, let's continue digging back through time.

February, 1987 - The NSA

In a 1990 USENET post (to sci.crypt) by Tony Patti (editor of “Cryptosystems Journal”), there is a reference to a February 1987 document, being obtained via the Freedom of Information Act, which contains the following:

“Although software was developed from open source material, the application of that information into the subject software program contains cryptographic capabilities that are controlled under category 13B.”

Tony Patti, who published that snippet, goes on to say:

“My primary concern is that those policies must comply with the U.S. Constitution and thereby allow the free dissemination of open-source/published material – including software (ESPECIALLY FREE SOFTWARE) which is developed directly from published algorithms.”

Now. Internal usage of the phrase “open source” within the NSA might be confirmed as early as 1987.

What this shows, in far more certainty, is a common understanding of the term as early as May 11th of 1990 (the date of the USENET post from Tony Patti).

So. Who coined the term?

The question of “Who coined the phrase Open Source” is still difficult to answer. But we can, fairly definitively, say this much we know:

  • The first known usage of the phrase (in context) by a company would be Caldera in 1996.

  • The first known usage of the phrase (in context) by an individual / journalist would be May of 1990 by Tony Patti.

  • The first known potential usage of the phrase (in context) by a government agency might be the NSA in 1987.

Could there be earlier references than these? It's possible. But, after some exhausting digging, this is as far back as I (and others) seem to be able to go.

One thing is absolutely certain: The term was definitely not created in 1998 by Christine Peterson.

August 9th, 2023 Update

This article was originally published back in November of 2021.

The Open Source Initiative, whose leadership has seen this article, continues -- to the present day -- to push the false story of the term being coined in 1998 by Christine Peterson.

Why?  They know, without a doubt, that the phrase dated back far earlier than 1998.  Yet they cling, almost desperately, to their provably false tale.  How weird is that?

What on Earth could they possibly gain by trying to change history in this way?  It boggles the mind.

Details like this are important.  Getting our history -- the history of Computers -- factually correct is important.  Because we love computers.  And making up false histories about them just makes no sense at all.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
7
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
GNOME Foundation Executive Director Out After 4 Months

His 4 month reign highlighted by GNOME attacks on Jews and visually impaired users, an expanded "Pride Month", pledging fealty to the UN, and defense of a registered sex offender.

The Article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/gnome-foundation-executive-director

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:25:19
4Chan and Kiwi Farms File Lawsuit Against UK

It is both an important legal case... and a brilliant trolling of the British government.

The article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/4chan-and-kiwi-farms-file-lawsuit

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:21:00
Microsoft Fires "Intifada" Employees

This last week, a group of anti-Jewish Microsoft employees got rowdy. Microsoft fired some of them and sent The Lunduke Journal a statement. Then held a media briefing. Let's watch it together.

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:27:39
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

I have Mint 22.1 using xlibre on a X230. It is running VERY well and seems noticeably smoother than the previous X11 it was using.

post photo preview
post photo preview
post photo preview
Lunduke's Week in Tech - Aug 30, 2025
GNOME Loses Another Executive, Microsoft's Intifada, & 4Chan + KiwiFarms Sue the UK

Yet another absolutely insane week of Tech News has wrapped up.

From more Microsoft troubles with their “Intifada”… to the 4Chan & KiwiFarms lawsuit against the UK, it’s been one seriously nutty week.

Oh! And the GNOME Foundation lost yet another Executive Director! This one only lasted 4 months on the job! Crazy! All of the stories are linked below (and free for all to enjoy).

And, once again, it is amazing how many of these stories were almost completely ignored by Brand X Tech News outlets.

One story we did not see this week was the final ruling on the remedy for USA v. Google. The case that could determine wether Mozilla Corporation can continue to receive 80% of their income from Google.

That ruling was expected by yesterday… but, so far, all is quiet. I checked in with sources at both Google and Mozilla… and neither has heard a peep about it. Will we see the ruling from Judge Mehta this coming week? Who knows!

Stories This Week

Note: All articles, videos, & podcasts are free for all (subscribers and non-subscribers alike).

Note 2: Links for the stories are all to Substack. You can also find links to all other platforms — X, Rumble, Locals, YouTube, etc. — which The Lunduke Journal publishes to, at Lunduke.com.

As always, thank you to all of the subscribers to The Lunduke Journal. Thanks to you, we can remain 100% ad-free and Big Tech free. Couldn’t do it without your support.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
post photo preview
Reminder: 50% off Lunduke Journal Subs ends this weekend

This is a quick reminder that subscriptions to The Lunduke Journal are 50% off for the entire month of August. Which ends… this weekend. August is almost over!

Monthly, Yearly, & Lifetime Subscriptions. All 50% off.

Because of subscribers (like you), The Lunduke Journal can stay:

You make this possible. Support from all of you is critical to keeping The Lunduke Journal doing what it does best.

Scroll down. Pick the subscription that works best for you. And feel good knowing you made truly independent Tech Journalism possible.

50% Off Yearly or Monthly Subscription:

Available via both Locals and Substack. (This includes full access the community Forum.)

That means $3 / Month. Or $27 / Year (which works out to $2.25 / Month).

Via Lunduke.Locals.com:

Via Lunduke.Substack.com:

Note: You can also grab a Monthly subscription via X, YouTube, or Patreon. There’s no way to offer a discount on those platforms. But those are still great options!

The Famous Lifetime Subscription:

The "World Famous Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscription" is exactly what it sounds like. Pay once and get full access to The Lunduke Journal. For life.

Now, through the end of August… you can snag one at a crazy discount. Normally these are $200… but you can grab one for $100. (You can also pay more if you’d like to donate a little extra.)

The Lifetime Subscription can be obtained via Locals, Substack, or using Bitcoin. All three options work great and are super easy (& all three include access to the community Forum). Scroll down and choose your option.

Note: The Lifetime Subscription only applies to Substack and Locals. Other platforms (such as X, Patreon, & YouTube) do not provide the functionality necessary to create Lifetime Subscriptions.

How to get a Lifetime Subscription via Locals:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Locals.com/support.

  2. Select "Give Once".

  3. Enter "100" (or more) into the amount field.

  4. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

How to get a Lifetime Subscription via Substack:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Substack.com/subscribe.

  2. Select the “Lifetime Subscription” option.

  3. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

If you would also like full, Lifetime access to Lunduke.Locals.com (which is included):

  1. Make a free account on Lunduke.Locals.com.

  2. Email “bryan at lunduke.com” with the email address you use on both Substack and Locals (can be different email addresses).

  3. Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status on Locals.

How to get a Lifetime Subscription with Bitcoin:

You can also obtain a Lifetime Subscription via Bitcoin.

bc1qyjakve8fywm8pz2v99v57yhjj0vzr2vjze6fcq

  • Email "bryan at lunduke.com" with the following information: What time you made the transaction, how much was sent (in Bitcoin), and the email address you use (or plan to use) on Locals.com or Substack.com (or both).

50% Off DRM-Free, MP4 Downloads:

Want to be able to download every show The Lunduke Journal releases (and watch them on whatever device you like)? As DRM free, MP4 files? Yeah. You can do that. For 50% off.

Note: This DRM-Free download option does not include access to the Forum. This option is strictly for downloading the episodes.

 

Choose the type of subscription that works best for you. Every subscription — big or small — goes directly towards keeping the lights on at The Lunduke Journal.

A huge thank you to all of the subscribers who have made this work possibly for so many years. You are truly the best nerds on planet Earth.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
post photo preview
GNOME Foundation Executive Director Out After 4 Months
His 4 month reign highlighted by GNOME attacks on Jews and visually impaired users, an expanded "Pride Month", pledging fealty to the UN, and defense of a registered sex offender.

As of today, the GNOME Foundation has lost yet another Executive Director — Steven Deobald, who lasted a short 4 months.

The previous executive director, Holly Million, lasted a grand total of 9 months in the role.

To say things have been chaotic within the GNOME Foundation, would be a wild understatement — with last year seeing GNOME elections overturned in secret meetings and massive cashflow issues.

The last 4 months, since the new Executive Director took the position, hasn’t exactly been smooth sailing. Here’s a quick timeline of just some of the strange activity since then.

And now today, August 29th, their new Executive Director is out. After only 4 months on the job. Did any of those events contribute to the departure? GNOME isn’t saying.

In fact, the statement from Allan Day, the new Acting GNOME Executive Director, is incredibly vague regarding the reason for the change.

“Steven Deobald has been in the post of GNOME Foundation Executive Director for the past four months, during which time he has made major contributions to both the Foundation and the wider GNOME project. Sadly, Steven will be leaving the Foundation this week. The Foundation Board is extremely grateful to Steven and wish him the very best for his future endeavors.”

According to the outgoing Executive Directors own statement — entitled “So short, and thanks for all the flinch”:

“As the board announced earlier today, I will be stepping down from the Executive Director role this week. It’s been an interesting four months.”

That reads to me like a firing (or a forced layoff due to lack of funds). But, unless someone speaks up, it’s unlikely we’ll know for sure.

The following was posted by Deobald (outgoing Executive) and Allan Day (new acting Executive) on the GNOME Foundation’s Matrix chat channel.

 

The statement, “I feel like I’ve been glued to an Emacs buffer for 3 straight days” suggests 3 days of discussions (or waiting) leading up to this change.

What will happen next for the GNOME Foundation?

With multiple years of absolute chaos — including financial troubles and an inability to have leadership last more than a few months (not to mention an obsession with attacking The Lunduke Journal) — it’s hard to imagine the next few months being anything other than a continuation of the insanity at GNOME.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals