Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Who really coined the term 'Open Source'?
The story you've heard is wrong.
August 10, 2023
post photo preview

Nowadays, “Open Source” is a well understood, widely used concept. Everyone who works within the software development world understands what it means.

But… who coined the term? Who is the first person to actually use the phrase “open source” in reference to software? Let's dive into some of the (sometimes conflicting) statements from multiple people… and what the reality actually looks like.

Was it Eric S Raymond or Bruce Perens? (Who, together, founded the Open Source Initiative in 1998.) Or, perhaps, Richard Stallman? Turns out… not any of those guys. At least not initially.

Let's start with the accepted origin of the term by the Open Source Initiative… and then dig further into the past... and why the Open Source Initiative is very, very wrong.

February 5, 1998 - Christine Peterson

In a recounting of a meeting, held on Feb 5, 1998, Christine Peterson of the Foresight Institute was attending a meeting with the likes of Eric S Raymond and Jon “maddog” Hall.

During that meeting, according to a recounting by Peterson, the topic turned to terminology. What phrase should be used for what we all now understand as “open source”?

A few options were floated – such as “freely distributable”, “cooperatively developed”, and “sourceware”. Christine Peterson recals that she was “the originator of the term ‘open source software’” and “between meetings that week, I was still focused on the need for a better name and came up with the term ‘open source software.’ While not ideal, it struck me as good enough.”

Peterson mentioned the phrase to Todd Anderson, who then mentioned it during the meeting. Peterson allowed the rest of the members of that 1998 meeting to come to their consensus on it.

Eric S Raymond, in response to this, stated the following:

“Chris's account matches my recollections in every respect and reminds me of some details I had forgotten. I fully endorse it.

 

I can add that it was indeed I who explicitly brought up terminology as an issue. I had a clearer initial sense than others there (though they did catch up with me later) that we were in effect planning a marketing and branding campaign. That sense was driving my thinking, and continued to do so for months afterwards. But it was something I didn't talk about much because I knew “marketing” was a bad word to these died-in-the-wool geeks, something they'd need to get used to thinking about gradually. I'd had to struggle with the concept myself before making peace with it.

 

The only other important thing this account leaves out is something Chris didn't know because she couldn't read my mind. The truth is that I spotted “open source” as the winner we were looking for almost immediately, the first or maybe second time it came up, well before I started advocating for it later in the discussion.

 

You see, I too was feeling like it was important not to step on the discussion, better to allow a consensus to develop without me forcing it. But I spotted the useful connection to “open source” as used in intelligence work immediately and was more excited than I let on. It seemed perfect for our propaganda needs - ideologically neutral, easily parsed, just enough connection to a respectable and established term of art. I was very impressed with Chris for inventing it.

 

I actually felt a considerable sense of relief when the other participants gravitated to the term. I would have fought for it over the alternatives on offer, but didn't have to. Bright crowd at that meeting; I was ahead of the curve only because I had put concentrated thought into the problems before I walked in. We all figured out what needed to be done, and we did it.

 

Ever since I was first reminded that “open source” was Chris's coinage I've been careful to credit it to her. She deserves her happy twinge. Maybe I would have come up with the same term or something as good myself, maybe not - it's good that we didn't have to roll those dice.”

But.

Was that really the first time the phrase “open source” was used in reference to software?

Turns out… no.

It, absolutely was not.

Let's go back further.

September 10, 1996 - Caldera

Two years earlier, in 1996, Caldera had acquired a number of assets from Novell. This included DR-DOS, CP/M, and many others originally created by Digital Research (helmed by the late, great Gary Kildall).

On Sep 10, 1996, Caldera released the source code for DR-DOS. The headline for the press release reads as follows:

“CALDERA. ANNOUNCES OPEN SOURCE CODE MODEL FOR DOS”

Going on to say:

“Caldera believes an open source code model benefits the industry in many ways.”

Clearly the phrase “open source” was in common usage (at least among some groups or companies) back in 1996.

But what about… earlier than that?

August 19, 1993 - Jerome (Jerry) Schneider

In a 1993 USENET post (to comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32), Jerome Schneider made the following statement:

“Anyone else into “Source Code for NT”? The tools and stuff I'm writing for NT will be released with source. If there are “proprietary” tricks that MS wants to hide, the only way to subvert their hoarding is to post source that illuminates (and I don't mean disclosing stuff obtained by a non-disclosure agreement). Open Source is best for everyone in the long run.

In a posting entirely about the goodness of releasing source code… it is refered to directly as “Open Source” (with capital first letters). Clearly, we're back to at least 1993 as a commonly used term... a term that was felt to be so obvious and common that it didn't need further explanation.

December 4, 1990 - Kent, the man from xanth

In December of 1990 a post was made to two USENET newsgroups (comp.sys.amiga and alt.religion.computers) that contained the following line:

“BSD's open source policy meant that user developed software could be ported among platforms”

The author was… “Kent, the man from xanth”.

Seriously.

But… can we go back… further?

October 10, 1989 - Chris Mc Donald

October. 1989. Another USENET post (this time to comp.virus) contains the following:

“I am struck by the lack of any reference to Virus-L, RISKS Forum and other INTERNET services which have for years provided we users the best available, open source information on the subject of computer viruses.”

That one feels iffy to me. Could have been interpreted a few different ways. So, let's continue digging back through time.

February, 1987 - The NSA

In a 1990 USENET post (to sci.crypt) by Tony Patti (editor of “Cryptosystems Journal”), there is a reference to a February 1987 document, being obtained via the Freedom of Information Act, which contains the following:

“Although software was developed from open source material, the application of that information into the subject software program contains cryptographic capabilities that are controlled under category 13B.”

Tony Patti, who published that snippet, goes on to say:

“My primary concern is that those policies must comply with the U.S. Constitution and thereby allow the free dissemination of open-source/published material – including software (ESPECIALLY FREE SOFTWARE) which is developed directly from published algorithms.”

Now. Internal usage of the phrase “open source” within the NSA might be confirmed as early as 1987.

What this shows, in far more certainty, is a common understanding of the term as early as May 11th of 1990 (the date of the USENET post from Tony Patti).

So. Who coined the term?

The question of “Who coined the phrase Open Source” is still difficult to answer. But we can, fairly definitively, say this much we know:

  • The first known usage of the phrase (in context) by a company would be Caldera in 1996.

  • The first known usage of the phrase (in context) by an individual / journalist would be May of 1990 by Tony Patti.

  • The first known potential usage of the phrase (in context) by a government agency might be the NSA in 1987.

Could there be earlier references than these? It's possible. But, after some exhausting digging, this is as far back as I (and others) seem to be able to go.

One thing is absolutely certain: The term was definitely not created in 1998 by Christine Peterson.

August 9th, 2023 Update

This article was originally published back in November of 2021.

The Open Source Initiative, whose leadership has seen this article, continues -- to the present day -- to push the false story of the term being coined in 1998 by Christine Peterson.

Why?  They know, without a doubt, that the phrase dated back far earlier than 1998.  Yet they cling, almost desperately, to their provably false tale.  How weird is that?

What on Earth could they possibly gain by trying to change history in this way?  It boggles the mind.

Details like this are important.  Getting our history -- the history of Computers -- factually correct is important.  Because we love computers.  And making up false histories about them just makes no sense at all.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
7
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
October 03, 2025
Debian: XLibre is Not Allowed, Devs Are Nazis

Reminder: Debian allows convicted child rapists to be Debian team members. Also, Debian left X.com, citing "Gender"& "Diversity", and offers internships... but not to Straight White Men.

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:19:38
October 02, 2025
Linux, Rust, & NixOS Use Master Branch, Support Human Slavery

Using the term "Master" in our software projects is racist, right? I guess that makes Linux, and most of the "Woke" Open Source Projects super, duper racist.

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:10:02
October 01, 2025
Fedora Linux Weaponizes Code of Conduct Against Jews

Call a Jew a "Nazi"? Fedora Linux (and Red Hat) say that's ok. Suggest that someone is being "antisemitic"? That's a "Code of Conduct Violation".

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:18:35
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

The Lunduke Journal will be live at 5:30pm Eastern (2:30pm Pacific, 9:30pm UTC).

You can find the live stream on X, Rumble, Locals, & YouTube.

post photo preview

Computers are boring...
Here me out here. Pictures below is a motherboard from late 2008. Is an Asus P6T X58 motherboard. You have tons of options and caveats. Want the fastest RAM? You're restricted to 6GB DDR3. Want to max out the RAM? 24GB but you're restricted to 1333 speeds.
You can use SATA, IDE, even floppy. PCI and PCI Express. All options. All things you have to take into consideration.
There are so many parts to consider.
For a nerd, this is like assembling a puzzle. You have to consider how it's all going to work together.
Now?
Well, now you get like 2 PCIe slots and 2 RAM slots, and anything that does anything special is just going to use USB. It all just works. There are only a very few things you have to consider.
That's boring.
It's like taking a puzzle and all sides are the same and each piece is numbered.
Grant it, 99% of the population just wants to put a picture on the wall. But if you like doing puzzles, you want a challenge. And nobody offers a new challenge.
This is why I ...

post photo preview

I know Audacity has been a little controversial since it got acquired a while back, but thought it was worth sharing. Looks like a lot of modernization is happening putting it more on par with something like Garageband for editing. I've been using Audacity for two decades now, so I'm pretty comfortable with the classic workflow, but can definitely appreciate adding things like non-destructive editing and plugins for real-time effects.

September 18, 2025
Final Reminder: Lifetime Price Increase in 24 hours

This is just a super quick reminder (so no body misses out):

This Friday (September 19th), the price of a new Lifetime Subscription to The Lunduke Journal will be increasing from $200 to $300.

Which means: If you want to pick up a new Lifetime Subscription for the lower price, simply grab one (via Locals, Substack, or Bitcoin) by Thursday night (Sep 18th). That’s roughly 24 hours from the moment I am writing these words.

Obviously, once you have a Lifetime Subscription you’re set. You know. For life.

I wanted to give all of you some notice so you could grab one at the lower rate.

Also worth noting: The Lunduke Journal has phased out sales and discount promotions. The current price of a subscription is the best price.

This will be the final reminder before the change goes into effect.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
September 15, 2025
post photo preview
Lunduke Livestream: Tue, Sep 16 at 1pm Eastern

The Lunduke Journal regular live-streaming is back! The next show is Tuesday, September 16th (tomorrow) at 1pm Eastern (10am Pacific, 5pm UTC).

You can catch the live video, for free, on X, Rumble, YouTube, & Locals.

We’ve got a lot of Tech News to cover — and who knows what stories will pop up between now and then!

Time permitting, we’ll also be doing a little Nerdy Q & A. So, if you’ve got something you’d like to ask, join us in one of the chat rooms!

Also, quick reminder that the price of new Lifetime Subscription is going up this Friday. If you want one at the lower price, now’s your moment. We’ve also added some new perks for subscribers worth checking out.

See you nerd tomorrow!

-Lunduke

Read full Article
September 14, 2025
New Lunduke Journal Sub Perks, Lifetime Price Increase Next Week

A quick update: There are some new perks for Lunduke Journal subscribers, and an upcoming price increase for new Lifetime Subscriptions (if you want one of those at the lower price, you have a couple days).

All the details below.

Lifetime Subscription Price Increase

This coming Friday (September 19th), the price of a new Lifetime Subscription to The Lunduke Journal will be increasing from $200 to $300. I wanted to give all of you a few days notice so you could grab one at the lower rate.

If you want to pick up a Lifetime Subscription for the lower price, simply grab one (via Locals, Substack, or Bitcoin) by Thursday night (Sep 18th).

The prices for new Yearly and Monthly subscriptions will remain the same. No changes.

Reminder: The Lunduke Journal has phased out sales and discount promotions. The current price of a subscription is the best price.

New Perks for Lunduke Journal Subscribers

I am working on adding a few new perks for Lunduke Journal subscribers — a way of saying “Thank You” for making this work possible (while still keeping all of the articles and shows free for the world).

Here are the perks as of today.

Perks for all Subscribers (Monthly, Yearly, and Lifetime):

Note: The eBooks & Games are currently only available on Locals & Substack (due to platform features). Those perks will also become available to subscribers on X, YouTube, & Patreon next week. Stay tuned for access details.

Additional (Optional) Perks only for Lifetime Subscribers:

  • The Lunduke Journal will follow your account on X.

  • Your name (real, or internet handle) listed in a special thanks slide at the end of new Lunduke Journal videos.

Both of these perks are 100% optional.

If you are a Lifetime Subscriber, and would like to take advantage of either (or both), simply email “bryan at lunduke.com” with the subject line “Lifetime Perk” (that part is important, I get so many emails this will help me see yours) and include a link to your X profile and/or the way you want your name to appear at the end of videos.

One of the nice parts of having Lunduke Journal follow your X account… is it will make it far easier (and more likely) for me to see your comments.

Thank You

I am working to expand all of the regular perks (books, etc.) to subscribers across all platforms (which was a little tricky, considering the differences in each platform, but I managed to figure out how to do it) — while adding a few new ones as well.

Nothing crazy, just a way of saying “Thank You”.

Seriously.

From the bottom of my heart, thank you for your support. The Lunduke Journal is only possible thanks to each and every one of you.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals