Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Myth: "DOS does not multitask"
Truth: DOS has been multitasking since the early 1980s.
July 31, 2023
post photo preview

Pop open any search engine, any forum, or any social network -- and ask if DOS is a multitasking operating system (able to run multiple programs at once)... or if it is single-tasking (only able to run one program at a time).

Heck, find any modern-day computer nerd and ask them that same question.

9 times out of 10 you'll get the same answer:

"No, DOS doesn't do multitasking.  DOS can only run one program at a time."

I'm here to tell you right now... that is false.

The correct answer is:

"Some DOS systems multitask, and some -- out of the box -- do not.  And, even those that do not multitask out of the box... can be made to handle mulitasking with very little effort."

To make that point, here's just a few early versions of DOS that handle multitasking (plus some extremely common software that gives all DOS users the ability to multitask).

Concurrent DOS (1984)

Gary Kildall's Digital Research had been selling a multitasking system known as "Concurrent CP/M" for quite some time.

And, in 1984, they began selling an add-on to Concurrent CP/M which added support for running PC-DOS and MS-DOS software as well.

undefined

That add-on, known as "Concurrent DOS", was updated to add full support for 386 CPUs and -- over time -- provided the basis for what would become DR-DOS.

In fact, the legacy of Concurrent DOS is long-standing -- eventually becoming parts of products from Novell and more.

Historical Sidenote: MS-DOS and PC-DOS owe their very existence to Gary Kildall's CP/M -- as they are built on top of a CP/M clone.  So adding in "DOS compatibility" to a multitasking CP/M was a reasonable thing to do.

IBM TopView (1985)

Want to run multiple pieces of software -- all at once -- even on an 8088 CPU?  IBM's TopView could do it.  It even included a text-based windowing environment.

TopView 1.00 - Programs.png

While TopView was quickly abandoned, by IBM, as a standalone product... it ended up having a massive impact on the overall computer industry.

As the story goes...

IBM management invited Microsoft to fly down to Boca Raton, Florida (where the IBM development team of TopView was located) to get an in-person demo of the DOS multi-tasking system.  Bill Gates, reportedly, liked what he saw and wanted it.  This led to IBM management forcing the TopView team to give the full source code to Microsoft... even without any agreement in place.

Microsoft then gave that code to another company named Dynamical Systems Research -- with the goal being to created a clone of TopView, with specific changes requested by Gates.  After this project got underway, Microsoft purchased Dynamical Systems Research (and the TopView clone named "Mondrian") outright.

This TopView clone never shipped... but all of this laid the groundwork for Microsoft's collaboration with IBM for OS/2.

DESQview (1985)

Just a few months after the release of IBM's TopView, a company named Quarterdeck Office Systems updated their "DESQ" software (which was a non-multi-tasking software switcher for DOS) to include full multitasking.

Quarterdeck DESQview 1.03 - Demo

Over time many features would be added to the popular DESQview software -- including support for 386 processors and, eventually, even a full X Windows system.  

MS-DOS 4.0 (1986)

While most versions of Microsoft's MS-DOS were, indeed, single-tasking systems (which appears to be where many get the false impression that DOS, in general, is single-tasking)... this wasn't universally the case.

In 1986, MS-DOS 4.0 made its debut.  With full, preemptive multitasking.  Seriously.

File:Multitasking MS-DOS 4.00 Command.png

Unfortunately, IBM wasn't terribly interested in a multi-tasking MS-DOS at this point.  Instead, IBM wanted to focus on the new OS/2 project.  Which meant that Microsoft scaled back the MS-DOS 4.0 project significantly.

As such, future versions of MS-DOS (including 5.0 and 6.0) would be single-tasking systems.

Wendin-DOS (1987)

Wendin-DOS is a fascinating system.  Multi-tasking.  Multi-user.  And, originally, based on a VMS clone.  Seriously... one powerful system.

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F76f8b1f1-4d93-479f-b12e-919347f1d7e1_562x683.png

While Wendin-DOS had limited commercial success, it remains one of the most interesting operating systems of the 1980s.  I recommend reading my history of Wendin-DOS (which includes an interview with the original creator).

The reality of DOS multitasking

Those are simply a few of the versions of DOS that provide powerful multitasking (and, often, multi-user functionality).  But I think it's enough to make the point.

So.  What have we proven here?

  1. DOS systems are, often, multitasking.
  2. Even MS-DOS (the most popular version) is, sometimes, a multi-tasking system.
  3. The handful of DOS systems which are not multitasking... can add multitasking functionality with extremely common software, available since the early 1980s.
  4. Lunduke can't seem to decide whether or not to use a hyphen in multitasking (multi-tasking).

The next time a person tells you "DOS doesn't multitask"... send them here and set them straight.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
13
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Microsoft Adding AI Facial Recognition, "You can only turn off 3 times a year."

Al Notepad, Al Paint, Al Excel, Al Word, Al GitHub... now Al OneDrive facial recognition. And Microsoft is limiting how often you can turn it off.

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:13:58
4Chan Lawyer Says UK Demands Make Good "Bedding for My Pet Hamster"

UK is threatening to block 4Chan in 60 days if it does not comply with OfCom demands. In other news: 4Chan is censoring Lunduke Journal stories & suspending users who post them.

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:17:10
October 14, 2025
The UK Begins Process of Blocking 4Chan in 60 Days

The United Kingdom Office of Communications (Ofcom) has issued a fine to 4Chan. If 4Chan does not pay the fine in 60 days, it can be blocked in the UK.

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:10:08
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
October 14, 2025

Heads up: The “Linux Sucks 2025” livestream planned for October 14 is being bumped out a couple days due to technical hiccups in the streaming setup.

Had streaming issues for the last several days, so makes sense to sort that out before doing a big show.

Updated schedule asap.

Now, let’s take a second to think about this. How can they access your BIOS remotely? Tell me again it isn’t just a back door with a marketing team behind it…

October 15, 2025

In summary, although tech companies have money. When the AI boom goes bust. Data centers will lose. Like big fiber optic rollouts during the .com bust. Underutilized, sold and used to capacity far later than expected.

Another thought not mentioned in the article. Which I heard in a WSJ podcast and sounds about right. (Linked below the article. And let's just say the commentaror sounds less than manly...) Fiber optics doesn't need line upgrades once laid. It's a one time major capital expense. But data center CPUs will continue going obsolete, with a need for expensive upgrades. Else, they'll be slower than other options later. Which makes for a continual cost, once that time comes when they are being used to capacity.

Also, ordinary consumers do not want to "pay" for AI. That prevents ROI from looking good.

Big tech spending on AI data centers and infrastructure vs the fiber optic buildout during the dot-com boom (& bust) – IEEE ComSoc Technology Blog
...

post photo preview
The Unpublished Anti-Lunduke Hit-Piece
A Tech Journalist interviewed me for a hit-piece article. But the questions made them look bad, and they shelved the story. So I'm publishing their hit-piece for them.

Back in September, shortly after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, I was contacted by a Tech Journalist writing for FossForce.com (a smaller, Open Source focused publication) who was working on an article around Open Source, Antifa, and the Lunduke Journal’s coverage of those topics.

This particular outlet had, several months prior, run an “anti-Lunduke” hit piece without first reaching out for comment — which resulted in their most popular article (at least on social media) in quite some time.

With that in mind, it seemed reasonable that they’d want to repeat that success with another “anti-Lunduke” story.

This time they were doing the responsible thing. They reached out to the subject of the hit-piece article with questions. I like encouraging Tech Journalists when they do actual journalism, so I answered each and every query with easy-to-quote responses.

But, it would appear that the answers they received were not conducive to creating the hit-piece they were hoping for — my guess is they realized their questions made them look like the villain in the story. The villain they, clearly, hoped to portray me as.

They opted to not publish the piece.

So I’m publishing their hit-piece for them.

Below is every question — and every answer (with no edits) — which I was asked, on September 19th, by a Tech Journalist by the name of Christine Hall, writing for FossForce.

Fair warning: This is very, very politically charged.

Enjoy.


September 19th

Hall:

The last time I mentioned you in an article, you castigated me for not reaching out to you beforehand. Well, I’m reaching out now. We’ll see what comes of this.

You do recognize that the vast majority of organizations using the term antifa as a descriptor are not in the least bit terrorist and pose no threat to society -- and indeed, the only threats they might pose to fascist groups are not physical or life-harming?

Lunduke:

Hello Christine! Nice to hear from you!

Many, if not most, of those proclaiming support for Antifa (within Open Source) have also made statements encouraging or supporting violence and discrimination.

Regardless of that fact -- which I have documented extensively in Lunduke Journal coverage -- when violent acts are committed (such as murder, riots, and lynchings) in the name of “Antifa”, to turn around and immediately declare yourself to be “Antifa” is a clear declaration of support of that violence.

Hall:

And why did you feel it necessary to call out Danielle Foré’s [the founder of the elementary OS Linux Distribution] trans status in such an ugly manner?

Lunduke:

There is a noteworthy overlap between “Trans activism” and support for political violence -- including in the recent murder of Charlie Kirk (the murderer’s boyfriend was “Trans”).

In the case of Daniel Fore, he, a leader of an Open Source project, regularly calls for discrimination (and violence) against people he disagrees with -- often in conjunction with his self-declaration as “Trans”.

Thus, his declaration of being “Trans” becomes a part of the overall story.

It is worth noting here that The Lunduke Journal has never -- and would never -- call for discrimination or violence against someone because of how they identify or who they may (or may not) vote for.

This is in stark contrast those, such as Mr. Fore, who consider themselves “Trans” or “Antifa” -- who actively advocate for both discrimination and violence.

Hall:

Mentioning a person’s trans status in ways that are pertinent to your argument necessates rudeness such as calling her a “dude who likes to wear dresses”?

Lunduke:

Dan Fore is, in fact, a dude who likes to wear dresses.

The only reason to view that as a negative is if you view dudes wearing dresses as a negative.

Hall:

I’ll quote you on that, which I’m pretty sure won’t bother you in the least.

Lunduke:

Absolutely! Quote anything I say here. In fact, I suggest quoting absolutely everything I’ve written to you here, today.

Hall:

You also understand, don’t you, that voicing disagreement with an assessment made by POTUS is not only legal but a healthy part of the national dialog.

Lunduke:

Absolutely! Did I say somewhere that it was illegal to disagree with a politician? It seems unlikely that I have ever said that.

Hall:

Also, how would you reply to this:

There have been very few murders linked to individuals associated with Antifa, some incidents of rioting attributed to Antifa supporters, and no credible evidence of lynchings conducted in the name of Antifa. Compared to far-right groups, violence attributed to Antifa is much less frequent and lethal, with only one suspected kill—Aaron Danielson in Portland, by an anti-fascist activist—officially confirmed in recent U.S. history.

Lunduke:

Murder is bad. I am opposed to all murder.

In the context of these discussions, bearing in mind the Kirk murder is important (as many statements were made in response to it). The murderer of Kirk appears to have been pro-Trans and pro-Antifa (based on all available information).

Hall:

Is there any evidence that the suspect was part of an antifa group? I haven’t seen any.

Lunduke:

I have seen some reporting to this effect (including statements from family and messages he wrote).

But, far more important to this story, is the response to the murder among Antifa supporters (including those within Open Source). A large portion of Antifa supporters have celebrated the murder as justified because it killed someone they considered to be a “fascist”.

Hall:

Also, no group should be held responsible for what some deranged person who identifies with the group has done.

Lunduke:

I agree that a broader group should not be held responsible for the actions of a small number of individuals.

However, and this is critically important, it is entirely appropriate to hold people responsible for their own statements and actions.

With that in mind: The overall messaging of Antifa (and Antifa supporters) tends heavily towards violence. Punching, killing, molotov cocktails, etc. are all common messaging used by Antifa (including by those I quote within the Open Source world -- many of whom have advocated violence against myself).

Advocating for violence, then celebrating when violence is committed, are not good things.

Yet we see a great deal of that among Open Source supporters of Antifa.

Read full Article
October 13, 2025
Sale ends in a few hours, Lifetime Subs set up.

Holy moly, you guys are amazing.

A few days ago I published a “50% off” sale for Lunduke Journal subscriptions… and all of you showed up. In a big way.

To everyone who grabbed a Lifetime Subscription over the last few days: All of you are set to full Lifetime access. You should have a confirmation email in your inbox. If not, email me and I’ll make sure you’re setup properly.

That “50% off” sale ends tonight at midnight. So you have a few hours to snag a discounted subscription, if you haven’t already.

A huge thank you to everyone who supports this work. Couldn’t do it without you.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
October 12, 2025
50% Off Lunduke Journal Extended Through Monday (Oct 13th)

Just a quick heads up:

The “50% off every kind of Subscription to The Lunduke Journal” sale has been extended through Monday (October 13th).

So. You know. Grab one at 50% off between now and end of the day on Monday.

To all of you amazing nerds who have picked up a Lifetime Subscription already this weekend: You are awesome. You’ll be receiving a confirmation email, with all of the Lifetime Subscription details, by tomorrow (if you haven’t already).

Oh, and remember how we hit 11 Million views last month? Yeah. We’re well on our way to blowing past those numbers in October.

Wild.

See you all on Monday!

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals