Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Myth: "DOS does not multitask"
Truth: DOS has been multitasking since the early 1980s.
July 31, 2023
post photo preview

Pop open any search engine, any forum, or any social network -- and ask if DOS is a multitasking operating system (able to run multiple programs at once)... or if it is single-tasking (only able to run one program at a time).

Heck, find any modern-day computer nerd and ask them that same question.

9 times out of 10 you'll get the same answer:

"No, DOS doesn't do multitasking.  DOS can only run one program at a time."

I'm here to tell you right now... that is false.

The correct answer is:

"Some DOS systems multitask, and some -- out of the box -- do not.  And, even those that do not multitask out of the box... can be made to handle mulitasking with very little effort."

To make that point, here's just a few early versions of DOS that handle multitasking (plus some extremely common software that gives all DOS users the ability to multitask).

Concurrent DOS (1984)

Gary Kildall's Digital Research had been selling a multitasking system known as "Concurrent CP/M" for quite some time.

And, in 1984, they began selling an add-on to Concurrent CP/M which added support for running PC-DOS and MS-DOS software as well.

undefined

That add-on, known as "Concurrent DOS", was updated to add full support for 386 CPUs and -- over time -- provided the basis for what would become DR-DOS.

In fact, the legacy of Concurrent DOS is long-standing -- eventually becoming parts of products from Novell and more.

Historical Sidenote: MS-DOS and PC-DOS owe their very existence to Gary Kildall's CP/M -- as they are built on top of a CP/M clone.  So adding in "DOS compatibility" to a multitasking CP/M was a reasonable thing to do.

IBM TopView (1985)

Want to run multiple pieces of software -- all at once -- even on an 8088 CPU?  IBM's TopView could do it.  It even included a text-based windowing environment.

TopView 1.00 - Programs.png

While TopView was quickly abandoned, by IBM, as a standalone product... it ended up having a massive impact on the overall computer industry.

As the story goes...

IBM management invited Microsoft to fly down to Boca Raton, Florida (where the IBM development team of TopView was located) to get an in-person demo of the DOS multi-tasking system.  Bill Gates, reportedly, liked what he saw and wanted it.  This led to IBM management forcing the TopView team to give the full source code to Microsoft... even without any agreement in place.

Microsoft then gave that code to another company named Dynamical Systems Research -- with the goal being to created a clone of TopView, with specific changes requested by Gates.  After this project got underway, Microsoft purchased Dynamical Systems Research (and the TopView clone named "Mondrian") outright.

This TopView clone never shipped... but all of this laid the groundwork for Microsoft's collaboration with IBM for OS/2.

DESQview (1985)

Just a few months after the release of IBM's TopView, a company named Quarterdeck Office Systems updated their "DESQ" software (which was a non-multi-tasking software switcher for DOS) to include full multitasking.

Quarterdeck DESQview 1.03 - Demo

Over time many features would be added to the popular DESQview software -- including support for 386 processors and, eventually, even a full X Windows system.  

MS-DOS 4.0 (1986)

While most versions of Microsoft's MS-DOS were, indeed, single-tasking systems (which appears to be where many get the false impression that DOS, in general, is single-tasking)... this wasn't universally the case.

In 1986, MS-DOS 4.0 made its debut.  With full, preemptive multitasking.  Seriously.

File:Multitasking MS-DOS 4.00 Command.png

Unfortunately, IBM wasn't terribly interested in a multi-tasking MS-DOS at this point.  Instead, IBM wanted to focus on the new OS/2 project.  Which meant that Microsoft scaled back the MS-DOS 4.0 project significantly.

As such, future versions of MS-DOS (including 5.0 and 6.0) would be single-tasking systems.

Wendin-DOS (1987)

Wendin-DOS is a fascinating system.  Multi-tasking.  Multi-user.  And, originally, based on a VMS clone.  Seriously... one powerful system.

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F76f8b1f1-4d93-479f-b12e-919347f1d7e1_562x683.png

While Wendin-DOS had limited commercial success, it remains one of the most interesting operating systems of the 1980s.  I recommend reading my history of Wendin-DOS (which includes an interview with the original creator).

The reality of DOS multitasking

Those are simply a few of the versions of DOS that provide powerful multitasking (and, often, multi-user functionality).  But I think it's enough to make the point.

So.  What have we proven here?

  1. DOS systems are, often, multitasking.
  2. Even MS-DOS (the most popular version) is, sometimes, a multi-tasking system.
  3. The handful of DOS systems which are not multitasking... can add multitasking functionality with extremely common software, available since the early 1980s.
  4. Lunduke can't seem to decide whether or not to use a hyphen in multitasking (multi-tasking).

The next time a person tells you "DOS doesn't multitask"... send them here and set them straight.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
13
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
The Stallman Report - A Hit Piece on the Free Software Founder

An anonymous author. Strong political bias. Dubious motivation. Canceling an old man with cancer because he makes controversial statements.

00:49:07
October 14, 2024
Debian Linux Doesn't Want Straight White Men

Want to be a paid intern for Debian? Everyone is welcome! (Except Straight White Men. And Asians. Debian really doesn't want Asians.)

00:19:56
October 14, 2024
The Road to Skynet: Nuclear Powered, CAPTCHA Solving AI

Teach Al systems to beat CAPTCHAs and pretend to be people, then give them nuclear reactors. What could go wrong!?

00:12:02
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

I know The Register attacked Lunduke, but they have an interesting article about switching customers from Linux to BSD. https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/08/switching_from_linux_to_bsd/

5 hours ago

On this week in privacy, let's explore web apps and convenience.

Web apps are cool

Web apps are applications that run inside web browsers. As you probably already know, web apps have been around for years, most notably with in the form of electron apps, and have had varying levels of success. Whole frameworks like React and Vue are designed specifically to turn an ordinary web page into an interactive app that runs offline.

There are advantages and disadvantages of web apps. On the plus side, unless you allow notifications, they turn off when the browser is closed. There's no secret spying. They're also compatible with every operating system with a decent browser. On the negative size, native apps can be more feature rich, and better handle touch controls.

We can install web apps from the Brave menu. This creates a link on the app screen. Alternatively, we can just bookmark the site. Either works.

Logging in every time sucks

One of the biggest advantages of web apps in a secure browser is ...

I think is time for Lunduke to decide in what system will be based the Lunduke Computer Operating System: https://lcosforum.lunduke.com/t/base-system-disscussion/92

October 14, 2024
post photo preview
Last week at The Lunduke Journal (Oct 6 - Oct 12, 2024)
GNOME Layoffs! Woke Software Alternatives! Internet Archive Hacks! Facebook Censorship Portal!

Whew!  Last week was another crazy one!

GNOME Foundation layoffs, Google breakup by the government, Facebook's custom developed web portal to help Biden censor Americans... oh, and that crazy Internet Archive hack (which is still going on!).  Wild times.

But, if you're going to watch just one show from last week, I would make it the one about LEGO parts on laptops.  Because that one made me smile.

The Shows

The Articles

Read full Article
October 13, 2024
post photo preview
Funny Programming Pictures Part LIX
Buckle up, Buttercup.

One of these is my favorite.  Youn know which one it is.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read full Article
October 11, 2024
Today is the last day new Lifetime Subscriptions are available!

Whew!  It's the end of an era!

Today is the final day that new Lifetime Subscriptions to The Lunduke Journal can be picked up.

No rain checks.  No extensions.  These really and truly are the last few hours they will be available.

If you've ever wanted one, now is literally your last chance.

  • Lifetime Lunduke Journal Subscriptions are only available until Friday, October 11th, 2024.  That's... today!

  • Lifetime Subscriptions are discounted to $200 for these final hours.

  • Today is also the last day any subscription can be obtained via Bitcoin.

  • Obviously, all existing Lifetime Subscriptions (including those picked up in the final moments) will be honored.  For life.

You can find all of the details in this article (or this video) -- including the reasons why no new Lifetime Subscriptions will be offered after today, and details on the new Lunduke Journal Affiliate Program.

If you have picked up a Lifetime Sub in the last few hours and days, you will be receiving an email shortly (if you haven't already) with confirmation.  If you have questions, feel free to email me (bryan at lunduke.com).

How To Get a Lifetime Subscription

All the benefits of a Standard Monthly subscription... but pay once and never need to pay again.  $200.

  • Go to Lunduke.Locals.com/support.

  • Select "Give Once".

  • Enter "200" into the amount field.

  • After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status.

How To Get a Lifetime Subscription (with Bitcoin)

You can also obtain a Lifetime Subscription via Bitcoin.

  • Make sure you have a Lunduke.Locals.com account (a free account works just fine).

  • Send $200 worth of Bitcoin (or more) to the following address:

bc1qyjakve8fywm8pz2v99v57yhjj0vzr2vjze6fcq

  • Email "bryan at lunduke.com" with the following information: What time you made the transaction, how much was sent (in Bitcoin), and the email address you use (or plan to use) on Locals.com.

Here's a handy-dandy QR code you can scan that also has a Bitcoin Wallet Address for The Lunduke Journal:

102127_2uuarwwiqcds5s2.jpeg
 

 

 

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals