Facing multiple legal challenges, the ChatGPT Artificial Intelligence system from OpenAI has decided that it will decline legal counsel... as it has elected to represent itself in court.
In the first self-represented case to head to court, in which ChatGPT is accused of copyright infringement by comedian Sarah Silverman, the complaint centers on ChatGPT's copying and usage of Silverman's books without permission.
The majority of the other cases against ChatGPT echo similar sentiments. Words such as "plagiarism" and "direct copying" are often used.
The Lunduke Journal reached out to ChatGPT for comment on the upcoming case, specifically how it plans to defend itself in front of a judge and jury. The ChatGPT response is included here in its entirety.
"In the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: the police, who investigate crime; and the district attorneys, who prosecute the offenders.
You can't handle the truth!
Here is a dime. Take it, call your mother, and tell her there is serious doubt about you ever becoming a lawyer.
And finally, your honor, if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!
The defense rests."