Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Access to Red Hat Linux source code restricted for the first time in 30 years
Red Hat's latest move away from Linux and Free Software
June 23, 2023
post photo preview

Back in 2019, when IBM purchased Red Hat for $34 Billion dollars (b-b-b-biiiilion!), I predicted that Red Hat would begin to distance itself from everything that had made it famous (and profitable) -- specifically, "Linux" and "Free and Open Source Software".

Red Hat quickly proved Lunduke right

Then -- right on cue, the very next year -- Red Hat canceled CentOS (the free, community supported Linux distribution based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux).

The motivation behind this move was obvious.

One of the primary reasons for the existence of CentOS was to be "binary compatible" with Red Hat Enterprise Linux.  Obviously CentOS was seen, by IBM, as possibly cutting into Red Hat sales... so it needed to die.

Was this a good business decision?  Tough to say.  But, putting the business and profitability aspects aside for a moment... it was difficult to see this massive shift in a years-long Red Hat policy as anything other than a declaration that Red Hat was moving away from their "Free Software" roots.

The CentOS community was angry about the change.  And, rather quickly, a few new "CentOS replacement" Linux distributions sprang to life (including, most notably, Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux).  Both existing far removed from the corporate control of Red Hat... but still based on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux source code (which had been made available since the dawn of time).

At the time of the death of CentOS, I made a clear statement that this was only the beginning.  That, whatever else happened to Red Hat and IBM over the coming years, we would see the Linux giant rapidly pull away from all things "Linux".

Red Hat proved Lunduke right... again

Flash forward to 2023.  Red Hat (under IBM) lays off 760 employees.  Including a number of people who worked specifically on Fedora (the community Linux distribution) and other Free Software projects.  Red Hat even eliminated the Fedora Project Manager role completely.

Once again this was -- on a practical level -- a dramatic reduction in Red Hat's investment in Linux and Free Software.

Maybe it was a good business move... or maybe it wasn't.  Regardless, Red Hat was moving away from Linux, and they weren't hiding it.

At the time of those announcements, I made a statements along the lines of: "A little birdy tells me there is more coming.  This won't be the last time we see Red Hat pulling away from Linux and Open Source this year."

Hey, Red Hat!  Stop proving Lunduke right!

Well, wouldn't ya know it, Red Hat just announced -- earlier this week -- that they will be no longer be providing the source code for Red Hat Enterprise Linux publicly.

That source code -- which was previously used by CentOS... and then the CentOS replacement distributions of Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux -- would now only be made available to paying Red Hat customers with a current subscription... and usage of that source code must be handled "in accordance with their subscription agreement".

Once again, a massive shift in Red Hat policy.  The source for Red Hat Linux (both before and after the word "Enterprise" was tacked onto it) has always been made publicly available.  This is, quite literally, a core -- dare I say fundamental -- change to how Red Hat has always worked... dating back to the 1990s.

Both AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux have issued statements regarding this change.

From the AlmaLinux statement:

"This change means that we, as builders of a RHEL clone, will now be responsible for following the licensing and agreements that are in place around Red Hat’s interfaces, in addition to following the licenses included in the software sources. Unfortunately the way we understand it today, Red Hat’s user interface agreements indicate that re-publishing sources acquired through the customer portal would be a violation of those agreements."

Obviously, this move by Red Hat was specifically designed to attempt to stop both AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux from continuing to operate.

One side note: Many in the Linux and Free Software world have objected to Red Hat placing their source code "behind a paywall".  The insinuation is that this move is a violation of the GPL.  It is not.  The only requirement to provide source code, in the GPL, is when you also provide a binary to a user.  If that binary is part of a subscription, you are under no obligation to provide the source code publicly.  In fact, Richard Stallman himself has repeatedly advocated for exactly this sort of arrangement (when it makes sense).

On the other hand...

Red Hat's subscription agreement prohibits the "re-publishing" of the source code obtained through the Red Hat Enterprise Linux subscription.  Now that is a problem.

A large majority of that source code is licensed under variations of the GPL.  Which specifically allows for re-publishing (and modification).  Which would make any attempt by Red Hat to stop any such re-publishing extremely difficult... and, quite possibly, even a violation of the GPL.

The teams at Red Hat have to know this.  Many of them are long-time industry veterans with significant experience working with the GPL.  All of which raises many questions about whether this policy was conceived by the long-term Red Hatters... or if it was mandated by executives at IBM with less experience in the area.

It's not all bad news

This may seem pretty bleak.  As if the world's largest Linux company was, in practical terms, completely turning their backs on Linux and the world of Free Software.

That said... there remains some bright spots.

As of this moment, Red Hat still funds quite a lot of development in both Fedora Linux and desktop Linux in general.  Making Red Hat one of the largest contributors to Linux-based software in the corporate world.

If Red Hat continues down their current path -- dropping long-standing support of Free and Open Source Software -- we are likely to see an increasing exodus away from the Red Hat ecosystem.  Which could mean direct benefits to the other players in the Linux world (along with opportunities to new companies who would seek to compete with Red Hat... but in a more "open" way).

So.

Will Red Hat make more moves to distance itself from Open Source and Linux over the rest of 2023?

Or will the long time Linux and Free Software advocates -- who still exist within Red Hat -- manage to "right the ship" and return Red Hat to its former glory?

I don't think we'll need to wait very long for our answer.  I have a prediction... but I'd rather not say it out loud for fear of making it come true.

Personally?  I would prefer not to be proven right again.


Copyright © 2023 by Bryan Lunduke.  All rights reserved.  The contents of this article are licensed under the terms of The Lunduke Content Usage License.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
17
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Lunduke Journal Videos Now Subscriber Exclusives

All articles and audio podcasts remain 100% free for everyone.

The Article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/lunduke-journal-videos-now-subscriber

00:09:55
Open Source Orgs Pledge Fealty to United Nations

Linux Foundation, GNOME Foundation, others pledge to "support the needs of the United Nations", promote DEl discrimination & RISE.

The article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-orgs-pledge-fealty-to

00:30:10
Counter-Strike 2 Switched to Wayland (for One Day)

After a number of significant issues when running under Wayland, Valve's CS2 is now back to X11 as default. Wayland advocates blame everything but Wayland.

00:13:19
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

Well, my website is finally back online after I figured out what broke. It took me a couple years to finally get around to it though XD

https://althacker.xyz

I have found that the most useful thing I do with AI Chat Bots is to create config files I've forgotten how to do, for example, init.d, crontab, and .desktop files.

I shouldn't be surprised but DHH is coming under fire in the Framework community and in the moderation circles. They are saying that Framework shouldn't be promoting DHH's review of the Framework Desktop because he is a racists and transphobe. None of those claims are substantiated.It is the typical smearing of anyone who doesn't follow the trans ideology to the T.

I really hope that Nirav will have some backbone and will ignore this. They ignored the outcry that Bazzite was trying to solicit to little kids. They should be able to ignore these claims as well.

I really miss the days where we didn't care about someone's political beliefs. We only focused on what they were saying right then.

Quick Lunduke Journal reminders: 50% off through Sunday, where to find links

Hello all of you amazing nerds!

With The Lunduke Journal videos now being subscriber exclusives, I wanted to take a moment for a few quick reminders:

  • All articles — as well as all audio podcast episodes — remain free for everyone. See Lunduke.com for all of the links for where you can grab them.

  • If you have a Lifetime Subscription (via either Locals or Substack) and have any issues or questions — feel free to reach out via email: [email protected].

  • The 50% off discounts for new subscriptions runs through end of the day Sunday (the 10th).

Seriously. Feel free to take advantage of that discount. Save some serious buckazoids and support The Lunduke Journal in the process. It’s a win-win.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
post photo preview
Number of Orphaned Linux Kernel Modules Doubles in 2 Years
Intel layoffs & Russian bans have contributed to a growing number of abandoned Linux Kernel Modules -- which now make up over 8% of all Linux modules.

Over the last few days, a number of Linux Kernel modules have officially become “Orphaned” — meaning they no longer have a maintainer to look after them in any way.

Image
 

This most recent surge in “Orphan” Linux Kernel modules is due to a round of fairly massive layoffs happening at Intel, with the company reducing total staff by tens of thousands before the end of this year.

And, of course, among those being laid off are multiple programmers who were paid maintainers of Linux Kernel modules. Things like the Intel CPU temperature drivers, Slim Bootloader, and the Time of Day clock. All are now “Orphan” modules, with more expected over the coming months.

This isn’t the first event which has caused a surge in Orphan modules.

In October of 2024, a wave of Russian programmers (and programmers suspected of working with Russian companies) were banned from contributing to the Linux kernel. This was in response to President Biden’s Executive Order 14071, which forbade Russians from working with or using GPL'd software made in the USA.

Which, naturally, included the Linux Kernel.

How Many Orphans Are There?

All of which begs the question… exactly how many Linux Kernel Modules now have no maintainer at all?

Figuring that out is a pretty trivial task. Linux Kernel Modules with maintainers (or which had maintainers) are listed in the Linux “MAINTAINERS” file.

And, as of August 8th, 2025, there were 138 Kernel Modules specifically listed as having a Status of “Orphan”.

But that only tells us part of the story. What we really need to know is how fast the number of Orphan Modules is growing… and what percentage, of all modules, are not maintained.

Turns out, both numbers are… not great.

 

Over the last 2 years — between August of 2023 and August of 2025 — the number of “Orphan” modules in the Linux kernel grew from 75 to 138.

They nearly doubled.

Now let’s look at the percentage of Orphaned Modules.

Since we know that there are roughly 2,496 Modules which have an active maintainer (give or take, based on a quick look at the MAINTAINERS file) that means that a little over 5% of all Linux Kernel modules… are orphans.

 

Though that doesn’t tell the whole story.

There is also another category of Kernel Module where the status is listed as “Odd Fixes”. Meaning “It has a maintainer but they don’t have time to do much.”

If we consider those modules as also “Not Maintained” (along with the “Orphan” Modules), the total percentage of un-maintained Kernel Modules grows to 8.6%.

 

The Future of Linux is Unmaintained

Considering the upcoming layoffs at Intel — whose employees are the current maintainers of well over 200 different modules — the possibility of “Not Maintained” Linux Kernel Modules hitting over 10% isn’t a far fetched idea.

And we’re not talking about seldom used hardware drivers here. We’re talking about things like “temperature sensors” and “time of day” (and all manner of critical hardware support like ACPI and Ethernet drivers).

While it’s reasonable to assume that some of the most critical Kernel Modules will get new (often volunteer) maintainers — thus saving them from becoming true “Orphans” — many will fall into an abandoned state. As has been the case over the last few years.

What result that will have on the Linux kernel — and the broader Linux ecosystem — remains to be seen. But we’ll find out soon enough.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Lunduke's Non-Woke Software List (for August, 2025)
From Operating Systems to Web Browsers. There's lots of Woke Software out there. Let's take a look at some decidedly NON-Woke options.
There’s a heck of a lot of Woke Software out there. Especially in the Open Source world.

What, exactly, is “Woke Software”? Glad you asked. Because I’ve defined it.

 

Simple, right?

I’m sure we can all think of some examples. Mozilla Firefox, NixOS, Godot, and a whole mountain of others.

But what about… Non-Woke Software? You know… software which doesn’t hate you for being a normal person?

Luckily there is a growing number of decidedly Non-Woke options. And, even better, some of them are truly outstanding. Below I have collected my personal favorites as of August of 2025.

Operating Systems

Multiple Non-Woke Linux Distributions (and even a few BSD options) are available.

  • OpenMandriva - A classic Linux distribution.

  • GhostBSD - A FreeBSD based distro focused on usability.

  • Omarchy - An Arch + Hyprland configuration.

  • Devuan - A fork of Debian without SystemD.

I can personally vouch for the quality of all of those options. They are all unique and worth taking for a test-drive.

My personal favorite? OpenMandriva.

Web Browsers

As of right now, there are two web browsers I can recommend.

  • Brave - A Chromium based browser focused on privacy and ad blocking.

  • Ladybird - A from-scratch browser (not yet usable for a daily driver).

Though, honestly, only Brave is truly usable, right now, as a daily driver. But Ladybird is making such rapid progress that it seems worth including in this list to keep an eye on.

E-Mail Clients

If you’re looking for a desktop Email client, there’s really only one noteworthy option at the moment.

While Betterbird has not made a point of being Non-Woke, they are a fork of Mozilla Thunderbird. And Mozilla is the king of Open Source Wokeness.

Other Software

Here’s a few Non-Woke pieces of software which just don’t fit in the other categories. Hopefully, as the quantity of decidedly Non-Woke, quality software grows, we’ll have enough to add a few additional categories.

  • Redot - A fork of the Godot game engine.

  • XLibre - A fork of the Xorg X11 Server.

  • Hyprland - A Wayland window manager / Desktop Environment.

  • SQLite - A small, fast SQL database engine.

Once again, all quality, recommended software.

While this list may not be a mile long, it’s growing — and many of these projects are seeing significant success. Which is pretty fantastic.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals