Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Commodore SX-64 -- The first color, portable computer
Bonus: The (real) story of the portable Amiga!
January 10, 2023
post photo preview
 

In January of 1983, at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, something amazing happened: The first, full color, portable computer was unveiled to the world.

The “Commodore Executive 64” was a truly amazing beast. A full powered Commodore 64 (itself released a mere 6 months earlier, in the summer of ‘82), in a completely portable form factor… including a color, 5 inch, CRT monitor.

It was an amazing machine that was, perhaps, quite a bit ahead of its time.

Plus — no joke — it laid the groundwork for a (fully functional) portable Amiga prototype at Commodore. Seriously. It’s real. We’ve got pictures and details.

But first… the story of the Commodore Executive (better known as the SX-64).

The Commodore Executive

Weighing in at a svelte 23 pounds — *cough* — the “Commodore Executive” was originally announced as a full line of “affordable” computers that would ship with a variety of options and models.

Some of those options included:

  • Up to two 5 1/4” floppy drives

  • Choice of monochrome or color CRT monitor

  • Battery for truly portable usage

During the first public demonstration — in January of ‘83 — the prototype model was named the “SX-100”. (No “SX-100” ever actually shipped.)

A full line of portable, affordable computers — in a variety of configurations — all compatible with the hugely popular Commodore 64? This was an absolute dream in 1983!

What could possibly go wrong!?

The SX-64

One year later, in January of 1984, the first “Commodore Executive 64” model was ready to ship. Dubbed the “SX-64”, it mostly lived up to the promise of what had been announced a year earlier.

It was a full Commodore 64. Full keyboard, full speed, full color monitor. No battery was included… as the unit already weighed a whopping 23 pounds. And, considering the battery technology of the early 1980s, adding that option would have taken the SX-64 up to a weight that would have made it nearly impossible to “lug” around.

 
An early Commodore Executive print ad.

The SX-64 also only shipped with a single 5 1/4” inch floppy drive… and no datassette port (used to connect a cassette player for loading programs off tape). This also posed some compatibility problems with a few printers of the time.

Remember how the “Executive” was originally demo’d with two floppy drives? Well, since the SX-64 only shipped with one drive… what did Commodore do with that extra empty space in the case? They turned it into a magnetically shielded floppy storage slot. You can then safely store a handful of floppies directly above the floppy drive itself. Not a bad idea, really.

 
Commodore Computing International, March 1984

The initial production units also had just barely capable power supplies… meaning that some peripherals (like some RAM Expansion Units) could not work due to lack of power. (This is also one of the reasons that there was only a single floppy drive… there simply wasn’t enough power to handle two drives at once.)

 
Excerpt from the Commodore SX-64 Users Guide. Note the two floppy drives shown… but not available in the shipping unit.

Finally, due to the small, 5 inch screen size… the decision was made to invert the default text colors on the SX-64 in order to make it easier to read on that size screen. This could result in some compatibility issues with C64 software that assumed the default colors were used. (Though these colors were changeable for SX-64 users.)

 
C64 on the left, SX-64 on the right.

Outside of these issues, the SX-64 was a highly capable, and highly compatible, Commodore 64 computer.

The DX-64

The second announced computer in the “Commodore Executive” line was the DX-64.

Essentially, the DX-64 was going to be identical to the SX-64, with a few minor changes:

  • Beefed up power supply (fixing the issue with RAM Expansion Units, and other peripherals)

  • Adding a second 5 1/4” floppy drive

While the DX-64 engineering was completed — and, ultimately, a few units were produced — it was never shipped and sold in any known capacity.

There are some rumors of DX-64’s in the wild. However it is difficult to know which units are legitimate, “Commodore DX-64” machines… as there were a number of aftermarket modifications to the SX-64. Particularly in Germany.

Thus, the SX-64 was both the first — and last — of the mass produced Commodore Executive line.

The End of the SX-64

While reviews for the SX-64 were generally positive, the sales were… not great. To put it mildly.

Initially released at $995, the retail price was significantly higher than the C64. Add to that concerns about the 5 inch screen size, the 23 pound heft of the unit, and the generally bad marketing… and you’ve got a recipe for poor sales.

 
Ahoy! Magazine, Commodore SX-64 Review

To make matters worse… many potential buyers were waiting for the release of the DX-64 model. They wanted that second floppy drive! Unfortunately, as we now know, the DX-64 was not meant to be. But, in 1984 and 1985, they didn’t know that. So computer buyers held off on buying the SX-64, thinking the better model was right around the corner.

How many SX-64’s actually sold? It’s hard to get exact numbers… the serial numbers for the units are not sequential and no sales numbers were released. But most estimates range between 8,000 and 10,000. Total.

Considering the standard Commodore 64 holds the Guinness World Record as “the best-selling single computer model of all time”… to say the SX-64 was a sales failure (by comparison) would be a wild understatement.

And, understandably, Commodore discontinued the SX-64 (and, with it, the dream of the “Executive” line) in 1986.

The Amiga SX-64?

Now… for a little side story.

If you like the Commodore Amiga… you’ll want to be sitting down for this one.

Did you know that Commodore built a prototype, portable Amiga based on the Commodore SX-64 case? It’s true. Behold!

Amiga 500 in a SX-64 case, called SX-500
 
Source: Twitter Thread

These units were, in essence, an Amiga 500 built into a Commodore Executive case… with a re-done, Amiga style keyboard, 3.5” floppy drives, and a mouse port.

Depending on which source you talk to, there were two code-names for these units: “The SX-500” (aka “An Amiga 500 in an SX-64 case”) or an “SX-52”.

Image
 
Photo source: Twitter thread

These “Amiga’s in an SX case” were created, at Commodore, by Hedley Davis — who also worked on the Amiga 3000, and a high-res Amiga monitor, among other projects. Unfortunately the SX-500’s never saw the light of day… and exist now only as carefully guarded prototype units that pop up at museums and Amiga events every so often.

 
Photo Credit: Dale Luck

How many were built? A grand total of three are known of.

While this isn’t exactly the long-dreamed-of “Amiga Laptop” that so many have yearned for over the decades… it appears to be about as close as we ever got to a portable Amiga hitting production.

All thanks to the Commodore Executive and the SX-64.

Other coverage of the SX-64

Because looking at such things is darn fan, here is a small collection of reviews and articles about the SX-64 from back in 1984. Enjoy.

 
April, 1984, “64’er” Magazine from Germany.
 
Easy Home Computer, June 1984
 
Computers & Electronics, August 1984
community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
6
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Ladybird Web Browser Developer Attacked by Unhinged, Dishonest Activists

Activists concoct wild, meritless accusations of "Transphobia" and "Human Slavery".

Read the article:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5823666/ladybird-web-browser-developer-attacked-by-unhinged-dishonest-activists

00:24:22
Crazy Tech People Who Hate Lunduke - Part II

NixOS banned Lunduke! Linux Mint banned the word "Lunduke"! Drew DeVault says Lunduke is a threat to FOSS!

Read the article:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5827876/crazy-tech-people-who-hate-lunduke-part-ii

00:11:53
NixOS commits "purge" of "Nazi" contributors, forces abdication of founder

The Linux project descends into chaos as political activists enforce extremist politics.

Read the full article:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5819317/nixos-commits-a-purge-of-nazi-contributors-forces-abdication-of-founder

00:19:42
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
We have an LCOS Forum!

It's completely stock at the moment. No categories. No default posts. Nothing. But the forum for The Lunduke Computer Operating System is alive!

https://lcosforum.lunduke.com/

As we get things setup, this will be where we handle all of the primary, day-to-day discussions around the system -- along with tech support, eventually.

FUTO Keyboard review after using it daily on my Pixel 5a for about 3 weeks.

This is alpha software. Not just the swype or voice typing bits. All of it. It's basically unusable. Key "presses" often result in adjacent keys. Swypes almost never produce the word I was after. I've never really used voice transcription before and haven't tried it here, so I can't comment on any experience with it.

Compared to the stock Google keyboard, the FUTO keyboard has a long, long way to go.

I like the privacy ideology, but it needs to work as a keyboard, and it doesn't.

I have a proposal: Those of us in the software development space like to call ourselves "professionals". I think this is a misnomer. One that actually hurts developers and testers, in the job market.

Back in the day, you were a "professional", if you professed a doctrine. This is where the title "doctor" originally comes from. The title signified your capacity to fully profess the doctrine of the school in which you were trained. Be it, medicine, or theology, or law, or philosophy, or even science. So, even though you might be providing a commonly needed service (as is the case in law and medicine), your title is essentially an academic one, and your designation as a "professional" doctor, or "professional" lawyer comes from that academic title, and not from your commercial service.

That's not what we do. in software (or even hardware) development. There is no doctrine of development to be professed. There are only people who need something built, and people with the necessary skills ...

post photo preview
Lunduke Computer Operating System Status - July 5, 2024
Licensing & Governance!

This was a rather quiet week for the Lunduke Computer Operating System (LCOS).  It is Independence Day here in the USA, and I took a little time off to celebrate with the family.  Likewise, one of the key early developers (working on the first version of our image creation script) took the week off to go camping.

Family time is important.  As is good BBQ.

Just the same, two very critical decisions were made this week.  Decisions which will have far reaching implications for the future of the project.

BSD Licensing

For all 100% original code (developed specifically for the Lunduke Computer Operating System), the BSD 2-Clause license will be utilized.

The BSD 2-Clause was selected for a wide variety of reasons.  Notably: simplicity, flexibility, and the fact that it has been well tested for over a quarter of a century (as the primary license of the FreeBSD project).

Also known as the "Simplified BSD License", it contains only two clauses:

  1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
  2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.

This license will be used for the imaging scripts, installation software, and any original software built for LCOS.

Of course, it goes without saying that a complete, functional LCOS installation will include a wide variety of licenses (from a wide variety of pieces of software).  But the parts we specifically build will use the BSD 2-Clause by default.

Government Structure

There are a great many issues plaguing many Free and Open Source Software projects -- often stemming from individuals, with motives contrary to the original vision of the project, gaining control over moderation or governance.

We see this happening in a number of different Linux Distrubutions and projects right now... and it just plain sucks.

In order to prevent this from taking place, The Lunduke Computer Operating System will be a monarchy.

While multiple, specialized governmental organizations may be created within the project (to fill specific needs)... a monarch will sit at the head, with the authority to override any and all decisions made by any such governmental bodies.

Some projects call this role a "Benevolent Dictator".  We call it a monarch.  For no other reason than because I like the sound of it.

All hail, King Lunduke.

Lots To Do

There remains a tremendous amount of work to do in these early days -- with a pretty hefty to-do list to crank through in the weeks ahead.  But progress is being made.  Even during holidays.

Regally yours,
-King Lunduke

Past Status Reports

Read full Article
post photo preview
Crazy Tech People Who Hate Lunduke - Part II
NixOS banned Lunduke! Linux Mint banned the word "Lunduke". Drew DeVault says Lunduke is a threat to FOSS!

My very existence drives many nerds to the brink of madness.  It is... a gift.

Below is a small sampling of nerds -- and Tech Industry folk -- who have lost their gosh-darned minds after reading a few of my Wild and Wooly Words of Wounding.

Here we go.  "Crazy Tech People Who Hate Lunduke - Part II"

Warning: One of the screenshots below contains some naughty words.  I censored those words... but you can probably still figure out what they were.  Also other screenshots, while not filled with naughty words, are mildly retarded.  Which may or may not be contagious.  I don't know.  I'm not a doctor.

Drew DeVault

We kick off this installment with a post from Drew DeVault -- CEO of SourceHut & developer of the Sway Window Manager.

 

Source: Mastodon

 

Drew DeVault wants people to know about an important threat facing Free and Open Source Software: "a small but growing community of right-wing conspiracy theorists ala lunduke et al."

You hear that?  I am a threat to Free Software.  I, Lunduke, am dangerous.  Drew fears me.

Hey, maybe there's something to that!  We've already learned that I am capable of destroying entire Open Source projects entirely with my "Word Magic (tm)".  So, who knows!  Maybe I am a threat!

Also... when describing "right-wing" people in the Free Software world... who do they think of?  Lunduke, that's who.  That, right there, is some serious branding success.

Wait.  "lunduke et all"?  "et al"?

And... others?  Who are the others?  Am I their leader?  Do we have meetings?  Was there punch and pie?

I HAVE SO MANY QUESTIONS.

Endless OS

Cassidy James -- engineer on Endless OS, co-Founder of elementary OS -- spends a tremendous amount of his time talking about that dastardly Lunduke fella.  Pretty much any time a Lunduke Journal article gains traction within the Linux world... Cassidy is there to remind people just how evil I am.

 

Source: Mastodon

 

Deadnaming!  Misgendering!  Regressive commentary!  Asking questions!

This Lunduke menace must be stopped!

I mean... come on!  Regressive commentary!  Regressive!

My favorite part of this is that last line: "[I don't know] if the contents of this post are true--I refuse to visit that site--but I figure you should know what you're linking to."

Everybody take note of what a good person Cassidy is.  You know he's a good person because he refused to read a Lunduke article... and he loudly told you (and everyone one else) about it.  That is the very definition of "good person".

I mean... Cassidy had to tell people how he refused to read a Lunduke article!

Shoot.  That virtue ain't gonna signal itself!

It's OSNews again!

The editor of OSNews.com is back for round 2!  Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you... Thom Holwerda!

 

Source: Mastodon

 

Yessir.  He's a professional.

I'm impressed I was able to find a post of his where I only needed to censor 3 words.

NixOS

Within a few hours of publishing an article on NixOS... the Nix team got to work on their most important and ambitious code submission yet: "Suspend Bryan Lunduke".

 

Source: GitHub NixOS Moderation

 

That's right: "Bryan Lunduke has been suspended on all platforms"

Did I have accounts on the NixOS forums and such?  Apparently!  I guess?

Have I ever posted anything to any NixOS forum or system?  I don't... think so?  I mean... maybe?

But I definitely won't be posting anything now!

"Check mate, Lunduke," exclaimed the NixOS Foundation Team!

Linux Mint

Speaking of being banned from Linux Distribution forums... that reminds me of the time, a few months back, when Linux Mint not only banned me from using their forum... but they banned any usage of the word "Lunduke".

Seriously.

 

Source: Linux Mint Forum

 

A Linux Mint user sent me the screenshot above, showing how the word "Lunduke" was instantly transformed into "violates forum rules".

So, naturally, I had to try this out.  It just sounded too ridiculous to be true.  Well, lo and behold...

 

Source: Linux Mint Forum

 

"I was told that my name (violates forum rules) was listed as a forbidden word here on the Linux Mint forum.  Which... just sounded too preposterous for words.  Thus I am testing it out.  ;)

 

Yours in nerdiness,
violates forum rules"

 

Ironically, this very publication was almost named "The Violates Forum Rules Journal".  Had a nice ring to it, right?

Within minutes of making that test post, my Lunduke (err... I mean "violates forum rules") user account was banned completely.

 

Source: Linux Mint Forum

 

Eventually enough people complained about this... so the Linux Mint folks unbanned my name.  Which means, I believe, you can use the word "Lunduke" again.

So, you know, I've got that going for me.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Ladybird Web Browser Developer Attacked by Unhinged, Dishonest Activists
Activists concoct wild, meritless accusations of "Transphobia" and "Human Slavery"

Two days ago, the Ladybird Web Browser made quite a bit of news -- with a major investment and the establishment of a new Non-Profit organization to build a "from scratch" web browser.

Positive, non-controversial, non-political, very nerdy news.

Unfortunately, within hours of the spotlight being directed at Ladybird, a group of activists launched an all-out-assault on the open source web browser -- by smearing it as "Transphobic", "Mysoginistic", and (this is absolutely not a joke) suggesting that the Ladybird developers actively support and promote human slavery.

Hundreds of posts repeating such smears (among others) -- with one Tech publication declaring a total boycott of Ladybird because of it.

What vile deed were the developers of Ladybird guilty of, which necessitated such an intense response, you ask?

Well, I'll tell you.

The Ladybird team stated... wait for it...

... that they were a "purely technical project".

Seriously.  That was their crime.  Being "technical".

Here's the details.

No politics in Ladybird

When the Ladybird Browser Initiative was launched, earlier this week, their team included a very small statement on "ideologically motivated changes".

 

Source: GitHub

 

That statement reads, in full, "This is a purely technical project.  As such, it is not an appropriate arena to advertise your personal politics or religious beliefs.  Any changes that appear ideologically motivated will be rejected."

Seems incredibly reasonable for a software engineering project to remain focused on... software endingeering.

However...

A number of activists decided to do a little digging and found a 3 year old suggested documentation change -- in a different, but related, software project -- where the word "he" was suggested to be changed to the word "they".

 

Source: GitHub

 

The person who created this suggested change -- who had never contributed to that project before and was completely unkown to the existing developers -- considered it a "minor nitpick" to change one word that wasn't, in his view, "exactly the best".

The change was rejected with the statement, "This project is not an appropriate arena to advertise your personal politics."

And that was that.  No controversy.  No conflict.  

Until this week... when the news spotlight was directed at Ladybird.

The Attacks Begin

Now, ask yourself, what would be the appropriate response to this?

A denied, 3 year old request -- by one person who did not have any involvement in a project -- to change one word that was a "minor nitpick"?

Well, for the writer of OSNews.com, the only reasonable response would be a complete ban on reporting anything about Ladybird (and deleting exisiting articles).

 

Source: Mastodon

 

And, if you ask a variety of activists on Mastodon, the Ladybird lead developer should be smeared as "Transphobe."

 

Source: Mastodon

 

You'll note that, at no point, has the Ladybird team ever mentioned anything regarding "Trans" issues.  At all.  Not one statement.  The Lunduke Journal looked high and low and found absolutely nothing.

And, yet, the label of "Transphobe" is liberally applied.

As is "Misogynist".  Often accompanied by swear words.

 

Source: Mastodon

 

Attack after attack after attack.

Just to kick it up a notch, some activists even began suggesting that the Ladybird project was -- through their use of software version control systems -- advocating for human slavery.

Not a joke.

 

Source: Mastodon

 

You can't make this stuff up.

At one point, responding to one of the various attacks, the lead developer of Ladybird, Andreas Kling, made a short statement on X.

 

Source: X

 

"I have absolutely nothing against gender neutral language," stated Kling.  "I am however against outsiders doing drive-by [code changes] with ideological motivations.  If a regular contributor [had] made these edits, I wouldn't have thought anything of it."

This statement did not stop the attacks -- which continue to be posted across social media.

The Source of the Hate

Transphobe.  Misogynist.  Slave Owner.  That is just a sampling of the insults, accusations, and hate being hurled at the Ladybird team.

And, as is plainly evident from the evidence above, these attacks are not based in reality.  None of the quoted statements or actions, from the Ladybird developers, could even come close to justifying the accusations being thrown around.

Which begs the question... where, exactly, is this hate coming from?

Well, it turns out... we've seen these tactics before.  And, interestingly, we've seen some of these people before, as well.

The Trans Political Activists

Just 24 hours ago, The Lunduke Journal published a story detailing how a group of Political Activists had conducted a "purge" -- of people whom they believed were not sufficiently "Pro Trans" -- from within the NixOS project.

And some of the individuals who conducted (or supported) that "purge" within NixOS... are also at work here... attacking the Ladybird Web Browser.

One activist ("cafkafk") seen below, within the GitHub repository for the developer being attacked, celebrating the fact that other activists -- organized on "The Fediverse" -- had arrived to harass the Ladybird developer.

 

Source: GitHub

 

That same activist ("cafkafk") had spent time within the NixOS project -- both leading up to and during the "purge" of political undesirables -- pushing for bans of people who were deemed insufficiently "pro-Trans".

 

Source: SerenityOS GitHub & NixOS GitHub

 

In fact, multiple key players in the "NixOS Purge" have been actively posting and sharing the anti-Ladybird attacks.

Attacks Across Open Source

Time after time.  We see many of the same tactics -- with many of the same people involved.

So many projects:

SUSE & openSUSEHyprlandAsahi LinuxElementary OSNixOS.

And, most of the time, with a consistent pattern.

  1. People who are not actively, vocally supportive of Trans activities... are attacked.  Smeared.  Vilified.  Typically with dishonest, libelous statements.
  2. No matter what sort of apology, justification, or attempt at appeasement is made -- by those being attacked -- the attacks continue.  Always.
  3. Eventually (typically quickly) the attacks escalate into calls for people to "step down" or be "banned" in some way.

While there are some minor variations, from case to case, the overall patterns remain strikingly similar.  And, seemingly, escalating in frequency -- with three significant attacks in the last few months.

In fact, if recent history is any indication, we're likely to see additional attacks involving Open Source Software projects and companies -- by the Trans Political Activists -- in the near future.

As long as their tactics continue to have even the smallest amount of success...

As long as those being attacked fail to fight back...

The Trans Political Activists will not stop.  They will continue to attack and hurt people.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals