Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Lunduke's Review of "Thor: Love and Thunder"
September 09, 2022

I'll try to keep this spoiler-free, but I finally got around to watching the latest Thor movie and had some thoughts I wanted to share.

Background: I'm a big fan of the Thor comics.  Enjoyed them for years.  I absolutely love some of the various eras of Marvel comics -- though I've found much of the newer stuff to be almost unreadably bad.  But the old-school stuff?  Amazing.  Some of the 1990s and early 2000's stuff (including some of the "Events" like Planet Hulk, Secret Invasion, Civil War, etc.) are also a ton of fun.

When I watch an MCU movie, there are three criteria that I tend to judge it on: "Faithfulness to the Comics", is it "Good for the MCU?", and "Enjoyability".

Faithfulness to the Comics

Was Love and Thunder faithful to the comics?  Well.  In parts... yes.  Sort of.

In fact, some of the more "controversial" parts of the movie were actually (somewhat) based on the comics.

The character of Korg, for example, has been around for decades -- but only got a real important role in the "Planet Hulk" series of comics (which was a fun series).  Within those comics there is a very (VERY) minor part -- almost a throwaway sidenote -- that deals with Korgs personal life.  That is extrapolated on within this movie in a way that proved to be (mildly) controversial.  However... it was semi-canon.  Even if it was done (in the movie) in a way that didn't make all that much sense for the character from the comic.

On the the other hand: Several other parts of Korg are distinctly contradictory to the comics and the established character.  Portions felt shoehorned in to make a point (or to provide a joke) that cheapened the character.

That same criticism applies to... the whole movie.  It is, in many parts, clearly based on various stories from the comics.

Jane's illness being another example.  While it was based (loosely) on the comics... it deviated from the comics in such a significant way that it took the actual story of "Mighty Thor" -- condensed it -- and all but obliterated the portions (in the comic) that were both the most enjoyable and the most emotional.

In many ways, it felt like the writer purchased a small stack of roughly 15 different comic issues (from over 40 years of Marvel).  Then read one page from each (chosen at random)... and based the script on that.  Failing to grasp the awesomeness of the source material.

Multiple times I found myself excited as something would happen in the film -- a line, a character introduction, etc. -- totally psyched that it appeared they were going ot tackle a part of Marvel canon that only the hardcore fans would know about.  Those moment were, as the film progressed, dashed.  Rather severely.  The writer seemed to almost have no idea what actually happened with those characters or plots.

Score: 3 / 10.

Good for the MCU?

Putting the faithfulness to the comics aside for a moment... was this movie good for the overall Marvel Cinematic Universe?

Did it help the characters or larger plot arcs?  Was it good for the vibe and style of the films?  Did it stick to MCU canon established in the other films... or hurt it?

In short: Is the MCU better or worse off for this film existing?

This is an easy one to answer... the overall MCU was damaged by this film.  In several ways.

It significantly cheapened Tønsberg (the MCU version of New Asgard).  It did strange things with the Guardians of the Galaxy that made them feel like throwaway characters.  Thor, himself, feels significantly more shallow (and inconsistent) as a character.

It took (yet another) "mass murder across the Universe" event and made it feel... flat and dull.  A trend that has continued to harm the storytelling of the MCU and this film accelerated that problem.

It introduced some new characters in a way that was... in short... significantly less cool or interesting than it should have been.  And set those characters up very, very poorly.

I can think of no way that Love and Thunder helped the MCU... and multiple ways in which the MCU is weaker, less interesting, and has more plot / canon issues because of it.

Score: 1 / 10

Enjoyability

That's not to say this film is all bad.

The truth is, there are multiple parts of the movie that were pretty enjoyable.  Even quite funny on occasion.

While the jokes tended to fall flat more often than land -- and there were a lot of them... this was more of a comedy movie than anything else -- there were some gems in there.  Enough good laughs that I did not regret watching it.

In fact... the number of jokes was a bit too much.  The whole film felt like a montage of unrelated jokes.  Almost like a clip-show of "Marvel inspired gags", stitched together by a villain recently introduced in the comics (Gorr) who had -- in the end -- almost no impact on the MCU.

Most of the battle sequences were dull and uninteresting.  One of them was a lot of fun.  Goofy.  Silly.  And caused some serious plot problems (both for this film and every other MCU film that Thor is a part of)... but still... fun. 

And the heavy emphasis on "relationships" and "love" was a bit off-putting.  Not because there shouldn't be love or relationships in an MCU film... but because they were both so flat that you really didn't care about the relationships (even though the film clearly wanted us to)... and so prominent that they distracted from the other portions of the plot.  The movie dealt with relationships (and love) of a good half dozen characters.  Which meant that a good portion of the movie was spent on relationships... without investing enough time into any one of them (at least not in any way where the audience could develop an investment into them).

Score 7 / 10

Overall Verdict

Would I watch this movie again?  Well.  Maybe.  But probably not.  Honeslty, if I were doing a marathon of MCU movies... I would probably skip this one entirely (along with Eternals).  Other than introducing a few side characters (poorly)... the events of this film will likely have no (postive) lasting impact on the MCU that won't be easily replaced by a quick throwaway line in a future movie.

Do I recommend others watch it?

Only if you've already invested the time to watch all other MCU films.  Then, honestly, might as well.  At least it's better than Eternals!

Not a glowing endorsement, I know.  But, hey, could be worse.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
5
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
December 31, 2025
GNOME Dishonestly Uses LibXML2 Support as Fundraising Tactic

The GNOME Foundation is using claimed financial support of LibXML2 as a reason people should donate to GNOME. Only one problem: The LibXML2 dev was forced to abandon the project due to lack of support from GNOME.

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:11:28
December 30, 2025
Torvalds: Software Freedom Conservancy "is just pure trash"

Following his criticism of their lawsuit against Vizio, the Linux creator says the Software Freedom Conservancy "is trying to further an agenda", & "is a racket, plain and simple".

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:22:56
December 29, 2025
Rob Pike to AI: "Just fk you. Fk you all."

After receiving an Al generated email, the programming legend (known for his work on Go, Plan 9, UNIX, & UTF-8) says, "F**k you people. Raping the planet."

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:20:36
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

Stewart Cheifet Obituary December 28, 2025 - Goldsteins Funeral
https://obits.goldsteinsfuneral.com/stewart-cheifet

I created a goal on my Ko-Fi to buy an external hard drive to store computer magazines, so I don't have to rely on the Internet Archive and save space on my laptop. It's going to be cheaper than running a server (my previous idea). I need your help archiving this important part of PC history.

https://ko-fi.com/johnpaulw

December 30, 2025

A stargate to nothing...

Investigating OpenAI's $25B (fake?) Data Center - YouTube

December 28, 2025
Reminder: The $89 Lifetime Sub deal ends after New Years Eve

Woah!

The end of December is almost here!

That means the “$89 Lifetime Lunduke Journal Subscription” deal is about to end!

When the ball drops on New Years Eve, and the calendar clocks over to 2026, the Lifetime Subscription price goes back to normal.

So, you know, grab one before that darn ball drops! (Then check out all of the Lunduke Journal Subscriber Perks.)

Because that deal is re-DONK-u-lous.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
December 21, 2025
Lunduke's Nerdy Q&A, Lifetime Sub for $89

Two quick tidbits on this glorious Sunday:

Reminder: $89 Lifetime Subscriptions

Lifetime Subscriptions to The Lunduke Journal are currently discounted to $89. For life. Which is… insane. That’s less than 1/3rd of the regular price.

Monthly and Yearly subscriptions are 50% off. Which is also pretty darned snazzy.

Submit Questions for Lunduke’s Nerdy Q&A!

On Tuesday I will be recording a long-overdue episode of “Lunduke’s Nerdy Q&A”.

Got questions you’d like asked in the show? No guarantees, but I’ll get to as many as I can!

Retro computing. Current computer news. Ridiculous hypotheticals. Any question is fair game... just make sure it’s good and nerdy.

To make it simple for me, there are two ways you can submit questions for this week’s Q&A:

  1. Add a comment to this thread on Forum.Lunduke.com.

  2. Reply to this thread over on X.

  3. Ok. I lied.  There are three ways.  You can also reply to this post, right here, on Locals.

Note: Only Lunduke Journal subscribers can access to Forum.Lunduke.com. All of the details on how to gain access are on the Lunduke Journal Subscriber Perks page.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
December 17, 2025
The FOMO of not having a Lifetime Subscription to The Lunduke Journal

Time for some Fun Lunduke Journal Facts of Fact-ly-ness!

  1. The “per-month” cost of a Lifetime Subscription to The Lunduke Journal is an asymptotic line. The longer you have that subscription, the closer it gets to $0.00.

  2. The Lifetime Subscription was first introduced 3 1/2 years ago… and is still going strong.

  3. The price of a Lifetime Subscription is currently discounted to $89. For life. That’s less than 1/3rd the normal price.

The earlier you pick one up, the quicker that asymptotic line begins approaching zero. Which is fun.

We Don’t Have Time Machines

If you think you might ever want a Lifetime Subscription, now is the time.

Imagine missing this discounted price and missing out on months of, mathematically certain, asymptotic line fun. This is one of those scenarios where Future You (tm) would want to travel back in time to tell Present You (tm) to snag a Lifetime Subscription.

Go. Grab the Lifetime Subscription for $89. That deal is good all December long.

There’s a video of me yammering about it too. Just for good measure.

You’re welcome.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals