Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
ID Verification Could Fix The Dead Internet
A plague of AI bots is devouring the Net like a swarm of programmatically generated locusts. And mandatory ID verification could be the only solution.
July 25, 2025
post photo preview

I’m going to make an observation that is likely to get me tarred and feathered. But, before you reach for your handy-dandy pitchfork, hear me out.

Age and identity verification requirements for accessing websites is a necessity… it should be expanded to most (if not all) of the Internet.

The reason is simple: Identity verification is the only possible solution to the army of AI driven bots currently infesting the Internet. Want to stop the Dead Internet Theory? This is the only way.

The Problems With Identity Verification

I want to make something very clear: Online age and ID verification has a number of problems. Very, very real problems that every single person is right to be concerned about.

  • What verification data will be collected and stored (and how)?

  • What additional security concerns are created because of ID verification?

  • Will the burden of that verification be too much for some sites to handle?

  • How will those verification systems be abused by corporations and governments?

And those are just off the top of my head.

Some of the issues are straight forward engineering issues. Some are downright daunting.

Regardless, those 4 bullet points alone are enough to make most people recoil in horror at the mere thought of ID verification becoming mandatory.

But mandatory it has become — at least for a small portion of (adult focused) websites in a number of locales. In several states in the USA, adult websites (and, soon, some social media sites) are now requiring age verification.

And, in the United Kingdom, the Online Safety Act is taking effect. Resulting in a massive spike in VPN usage as people work around age verification on adult-only websites.

 

There’s a pretty clear takeaway here. Some people really like being anonymous. Especially when doing “naughty” things.

In short: There are real concerns with online ID verification, and many people don’t like it.

Which brings us to The Dead Internet Theory… and how ID verification may be the only solution.

The Plague of The Dead Internet

The Dead Internet Theory is simple:

“The Internet is now predominantly bot traffic, with humans being the minority.”

As of last year, this theory has been confirmed just about every way you can confirm it. The most recent Bad Bot Reportshows that actual humans make up only 49% of global Internet traffic.

 

Social Media platforms, like X, are filled with AI-driven bot farms. So much so that it is making it increasingly difficult to determine true public sentiment on any given issue — as the bots flood topics and threads in order to push specific narratives.

Want to have a conversation with other humans? Good luck.

And Meta is intentionally filling Facebook timelines with bots. As a business strategy.

Make no mistake, these bots are destroying the value of the Internet. Making it less usable and less worthwhile by the day.

The plague of the Dead Internet is devouring the Net like a swarm of programmatically generated, GPU accelerated locusts.

And those locusts are multiplying much faster than we are.

Stopping this plague — killing off those bots — is, at present, a seemingly insurmountable task. No “bot detection” algorithm will ever be good enough — just ask developers of Massively Multiplayer Online games about how difficult it is to stop bots (even in a well confined and controlled setting).

As long as most websites require no more than a simple email address to create a new account… the bots will continue. The bots will thrive.

The Solution is a Bitter Pill

The solution to the Dead Internet is obvious… but unappetizing.

In order to stop the bots — and reclaim the Internet for humans — we must require verification of humanity in order to use the Internet.

How do we do that?

Obviously simple “captchas” don’t do the trick.

  • “Type these funny looking letters!”

  • “Click every box that has a motorcycle!”

Bots can figure those out without breaking a sweat (I, on the other hand, have a hard time with them).

And, like we already discussed, bot detection algorithms simply do not work — at least not for more than a few hours before the bots get improved to work around the algorithm.

The only real solution is identity verification.

Exactly the type of ID & age verification that is happening right now in some US states and the UK. Except that, in order for this to truly work, websites must take it to the extreme.

To ensure that a website isn’t flooded with bots (like what we see on YouTube, X, etc.) that website must require ID verification… for absolutely everyone who uses it. Not simply for a handful of states. For everyone. No exceptions.

Want your views to count? Want to post, comment, or like? You need to get your ID verified first.

I know. Most of us hate that idea. And for good reason. It feels like a horrific step down a dark road into a dystopian future.

But it’s the only viable solution to the Dead Internet.

Which means we are left with two choices for any given website:

  1. Be able to use it anonymously… but most of the content is driven by AI and bots (including other commenters, publishers, etc.)… to the point where any interaction you have is increasingly unlikely to be a real human. And any count of “views”, “likes”, “followers”, “comments”, etc. is utterly meaningless. The bots will dominate all.

  2. ID verification required. With very few bots. Views, likes, etc. will all be real (or at least more real). The people you talk to will be human.

I recognize that most of us will look at both of those options with some level of disgust. But this is the reality we live in. Those are our options if we want this “Internet” thing to continue.

My personal opinion is that sites like X, YouTube, etc. should implement mandatory ID verification.

I don’t like it… but the alternative is that, very soon, those sites will be all but useless as the locusts take over.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
20
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Lunduke Journal Videos Now Subscriber Exclusives

All articles and audio podcasts remain 100% free for everyone.

The Article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/lunduke-journal-videos-now-subscriber

00:09:55
Open Source Orgs Pledge Fealty to United Nations

Linux Foundation, GNOME Foundation, others pledge to "support the needs of the United Nations", promote DEl discrimination & RISE.

The article:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-orgs-pledge-fealty-to

00:30:10
Counter-Strike 2 Switched to Wayland (for One Day)

After a number of significant issues when running under Wayland, Valve's CS2 is now back to X11 as default. Wayland advocates blame everything but Wayland.

00:13:19
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
4 hours ago
post photo preview
post photo preview

Not at all nerdy, but I saw this on Substack and it gave me a chuckle. Consider it a friendly reminder to always proofread what you write, lol.

post photo preview
post photo preview
Tea App Clone Exposes Driver’s Licenses
Last month the Tea App exposed 60 GB of personal data (including the government ID of users). Now a clone "TeaOnHer" App did the exact same thing. The future is stupid.

Last month, we saw the massive data breach of the “Tea App” — a smartphone app for women to talk about men they don’t like — resulting in over 60 GB of personally identifiable data leaked out to the public. Stuff like selfies and pictures of drivers licenses.

Well, it didn’t take long for a “TeaOnHer” App to appear — with the same basic functionality, except this time for men to talk about women they don’t like.

 

And, of course, the developer of “TeaOnHer” made the same basic mistake that the “Tea App” made: They permanently stored a ton of personal information. Including, once again, divers licenses.

You can already see where this is going.

Driver’s Licenses Everywhere

Almost as soon as the “TeaOnHer” app went live, writers for TechCrunch went looking to see if they could easily access any of that data. Because wouldn’t that be crazy if a copy-cat app made the exact same kind of security mistakes as the app it was copying?

What TechCrunch found was that it took no more than around 10 minutes for them to begin accessing pictures of drivers licenses of user accounts.

 

10 minutes!

With a bunch of the usual suspects of bad security being involved: unprotected file storage (in this case, Amazon), public API documentation, and a lack of secured API calls.

Now, unlike the “Tea App” breach — which resulted in massive archives of personal data published all over the web — it isn’t known if these vulnerabilities actually resulted in significant data archives getting out there in the wild.

But, as the writers at TechCrunch put it, “The bugs were so easy to find that it would be sheer luck if nobody malicious found them before we did.”

There’s a Lesson Here… But it Won’t Be Learned

Sure, this “hack” of the “TeaOnHer” App was easy — as was the hack of the “TeaApp” before it. Both of those systems were comically insecure.

But, the reality is, no complex online system is truly secure.

Have a website or App which stores (and publishes) user data? It can be hacked.

And, if there is sufficient interest in obtaining whatever data is being stored, not only can it be hacked… but it will be hacked.

The HaveIBeenPwned site, alone, has documented close to 15 Billion (with a B) accounts which have not only been breached… but reported and (often) made available in some way.

 

And that 15 Billion is only the breached accounts which we know about.

Anyone who works in IT can tell you that the vast majority of data breaches are never discovered. And the majority of those which are discovered… are never disclosed publicly.

Considering that the current population of the Earth is roughly 8 Billion, it’s safe to assume that every single adult on Earth, with an Internet connection, probably has several breached accounts already.

With the frequency, and size, of such data breaches increasing.

Should these Tea Apps have had better security? You bet your tuchus. From the looks of things neither developer spent any significant time trying to implement even the most basic security precautions.

For Pete’s sake, at least try to slow the hackers down a little.

But the real problem here is not the total lack of security — even “good” security can (and will) be overcome.

No.

The real problem is the type of data being permanently stored, in an Internet accessible way, by these services. If a service is likely to be breached (and any significant service is), a key goal is to limit the amount of data which a hacker can gain access to.

Here are a few good rules of thumb when dealing with data being stored on an Internet accessible server:

  • Do not store any more data, at any given moment, than is 100% necessary.

  • If previously stored data is no longer needed, delete it. Completely. Not “flagged” for deletion. Actually deleted.

  • Whatever data you are storing should be encrypted whenever possible.

  • If sensitive personal data absolutely must be stored, for legal and regulatory reasons, consider physical archives stored in a secure location instead of an Internet connected server.

  • And, of course, don’t use unprotected (or barely protected) “cloud” file storage like the numbskull developers of these “Tea” apps did. That never ends well.

Simple guidelines which, if followed, could significantly reduce the negative impact of inevitable data breaches.

But, of course, few online services — big or small — will follow such guidelines. They will continue expanding the quantity of data they store on increasingly complex systems.

Which means we’ll see more and more data breaches — containing an ever increasing amount of personal data.

Welcome to the future.

The stupid, stupid future.

Read full Article
post photo preview
50% Off Lunduke Journal for August
You save money. The Lunduke Journal gets more subscribers. Win-win.

This last weekend we had a “50% off Subscriptions” sale — and the response was nothing short of phenomenal. Amazing to see so many people supporting truly independent Tech Journalism!

The future looks bright.

You know what? Just for kicks, let’s extend that 50% off… for the entire month of August.

Take your time. Pick the subscription type (below) that makes the most sense for you (there are many, most excellent options).

Note: The 50% off discounts are available via Locals, Substack, & Itch (MP4 Downloads). Monthly subscriptions are also available on X, Patreon, & YouTube, but those platforms do not have the ability to provide these types of discounts.

If you’re ever unsure of where to grab the latest articles, podcasts, and videos from The Lunduke Journal, check out Lunduke.com.

50% Off Yearly or Monthly Subscription:

Available via both Locals and Substack. (This includes full access to all new videos & the community Forum.)

That means $3 / Month. Or $27 / Year (which works out to $2.25 / Month).

Via Lunduke.Locals.com:

Via Lunduke.Substack.com:

Note: You can also grab a Monthly subscription via X, YouTube, or Patreon. There’s no way to offer a discount on those platforms. But those are still good options!

The Famous Lifetime Subscription:

The "World Famous Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscription" is exactly what it sounds like. Pay once and get full access to The Lunduke Journal. For life.

Now, through the entire month of August… you can snag one at a crazy discount. Normally these are $200… but you can grab one for $100. (You can also pay more if you’d like to donate a little extra.)

The Lifetime Subscription can be obtained via Locals, Substack, or using Bitcoin. All three options work great and are super easy (& all three include full access to both new videos & the community Forum). Scroll down and choose your option.

Note: The Lifetime Subscription only applies to Substack and Locals. Other platforms (such as X, Patreon, & YouTube) do not provide the functionality necessary to create Lifetime Subscriptions.

How to get a Lifetime Subscription via Locals:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Locals.com/support.

  2. Select "Give Once".

  3. Enter "100" (or more) into the amount field.

  4. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

How to get a Lifetime Subscription via Substack:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Substack.com/subscribe.

  2. Select the “Lifetime Subscription” option.

  3. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

If you would also like full, Lifetime access to Lunduke.Locals.com (which is included):

  1. Make a free account on Lunduke.Locals.com.

  2. Email “bryan at lunduke.com” with the email address you use on both Substack and Locals (can be different email addresses).

  3. Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status on Locals.

How to get a Lifetime Subscription with Bitcoin:

You can also obtain a Lifetime Subscription via Bitcoin.

bc1qyjakve8fywm8pz2v99v57yhjj0vzr2vjze6fcq

  • Email "bryan at lunduke.com" with the following information: What time you made the transaction, how much was sent (in Bitcoin), and the email address you use (or plan to use) on Locals.com or Substack.com (or both).

50% Off DRM-Free, MP4 Downloads:

Want to be able to download every show The Lunduke Journal releases (and watch them on whatever device you like)? Yeah. You can do that. For 50% off.

Note: This DRM-Free download option does not include access to the Forum. This option is strictly for downloading the episodes.

No matter which type of subscription you choose, thank you for your support! Every subscription goes directly towards keeping The Lunduke Journal running well into the future.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
post photo preview
Linux Foundation’s New Banned Words: Hung, Pow-wow, & Sanity Check
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences, Netflix, Apple, & Intel teamed up with The Linux Foundation to say "don't use HUNG when talking about software."

The Linux Foundation has announced the release of a new “Inclusive Language Guide” — which adds a handful of new words you are not allowed to say.

And it’s even more ridiculous than you might expect.

 

This new “Inclusive Language Guide” is designed to “drive a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive culture” (read: DEI) and to replace “offensive language” with “acceptable language”.

Past iterations of the “Inclusive Language Guide” included “Socially Charged” words such as “Master / Slave”, “Black / White”, and even “Owner”.

This new revision officially adds “Pow-wow” to that list of death-causing words.

 

Of course, any “gendered language” remains firmly off limits. “Manpower”? Can’t say that. And definitely don’t use “gendered” pronouns like “he” or “she”.

Doing so is literally genocide.

 

Which brings us to my favorite new additions (to the “Ableist” and “Violent” language sections of the list).

  • Sanity Check

  • Dummy

  • Hung

That’s right. You can’t use the word “hung” anymore.

 

I deleted 3 different titles for this story containing the word “hung”. They were all very entertaining and very inappropriate. I would like credit for the restraint I am showing right now.

As crazy, insane, and abnormal (see what I did there?) as this list of “bad” words is… what’s even stranger is the group behind it.

This is a joint project between The Linux Foundation and — wait for it — the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences. Yes. The one that produces the Oscars.

 

The two organizations teamed up to create the Academy Software Foundation.

Which, apparently, ran out of worthwhile things to work on… and, instead, chose to add “hung” to a “don’t use this word in the software industry” list.

That organization also worked with the Alliance for OpenUSDanother Linux Foundation Project — to publish this list.

 

Who, exactly, is responsible for making all of this happen at the Alliance for OpenUSD?

Pixar, Nvidia, Adobe, Autodesk, and Apple.

 

And the leadership over at the Academy Software Foundation includes companies like Netflix, Sony, Adobe, Intel, Microsoft, and Epic Games.

 

Right about now you may be wondering why Epic Games and Amazon is so worried about you using the word “hung”.

I don’t have an answer for you.

It’s weird.


Thanks to all of the subscribers to The Lunduke Journal for making this work possible — without taking a single dime from Big Tech (or running a single ad). Check Lunduke.com for all the ways you can get the articles, podcasts, and videos.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals