Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
Microsoft's "Revenue Bomb" of the early 1980s
The plan: Develop the same software for every computer platform they could find (including C64, Apple II, and UNIX).
August 25, 2023
post photo preview

It is fascinating to look back at the way Microsoft’s approach to the software industry has changed over the years.

Case in point: In the early 1980s, Microsoft was attempting to make software for every microcomputer they could find. This was an effort they called “The Revenue Bomb”.

Multiplan: The first “Revenue Bomb” software

In 1982, Microsoft released a new spreadsheet program which was envisioned as a direct competitor to VisiCalc (the first commercially successful spreadsheet software).

This is what VisiCalc looked like on an Apple II

Initially, that new Microsoft Software was called “Electronic Paper” (aka “EP”). The idea was to unseat VisiCalc by doing something truly impressive: Releasing Electronic Paper for as many computer platforms as humanly possible.

Microsoft was — at least in the early days — a very “multi-platform” computer company. Developing core operating systems and BASIC implementations for a wide variety of platforms (including Commodore 64, Apple II, Tandy, and so many others). Heck, they even made hardware for the Apple II.

In order to accomplish this task -- of releasing for such a huge number of platforms -- Microsoft developed a P-Code C compiler which they could then, in turn, port to a number of existing 8-bit platforms… all without needing to make any (substantial) changes to the core code of Electronic Paper itself.

P-Code (or Portable Code) is a type of machine code that was intended to run within a virtual machine (to one degree or another). If you could port the underlying virtual machine to a new platform, the P-Code compiled software could (in theory) simply work “out of the box”.

By the time the first version of Electronic Paper was ready to ship — initially for the CP/M operating system (from Gary Kildall’s Digital Research) — the name was changed to “Microsoft Multiplan” (or “MP”)… and Microsoft was off to the races.

Advertisement from the August, 1983 issue of BYTE magazine

Over the years that followed, Microsoft ported Multiplan to as many platforms and operating systems as they possibly could… thanks, in very large part, to their “P-Code written in C” approach.

Microsoft Multiplan for Commodore 64

Multiplan was everywhere in the 1980s.

CP/M, Apple II, the Macintosh, Commodore 64, DOS, Xenix / UNIX, MSX, the TI-99/4a, the TRS-80 (various models), and even the Thomson TO9+.

Microsoft Multiplan for the Macintosh

Yeah. When I say Multiplan was everywhere… I mean it. It was almost hard to find a computer platform that did not have a version of Microsoft Multiplan available.

The man behind “The Revenue Bomb”

This strategy of releasing Multiplan for so many platforms was not accidental. It was a plan laid out by Charles Simonyi, the head of Microsoft’s application software group.

The developer of the P-Code compiler, Richard Brodie (who would go on to develop the first version of Microsoft Word), described it this way:

“Here's how the Revenue Bomb worked. You would list all the different business products that Microsoft would develop on the horizontal axis. On the vertical axis, you would list all the different personal computers that were coming out from the dozens of hardware manufacturers. The p-code C compiler, which I named "CS" and which was used for more than ten years to develop Microsoft application software, would allow us to create separate versions of each product very easily for each of the different machines.

 

What we didn't realize -- nor did most people in those days -- was that there wouldn't be dozens of different PC architectures competing for the market. There would soon be only two: IBM's and Apple's Macintosh. But CS gave Microsoft the upper hand for many years in developing Mac and IBM applications hand-in-hand.”

Charles Simonyi & Richard Brodie (courtesy Richard Brodie)

Using Brodie’s P-Code C compiler, the task to develop Multiplan fell to a programmer, recruited from MIT, named Doug Klunder. As Brodie describes it:

“But Charles's mission was to compete against the surprisingly successful VisiCalc, the first spreadsheet program. He was to develop Microsoft's spreadsheet, a project code-named "EP" (for "Electronic Paper") and later marketed as Microsoft Multiplan. That task he entrusted to Doug Klunder, programmer extraordinaire, who would go on to lead the development of the unmatched Excel after Multiplan's lukewarm market reception in the face of Lotus 1-2-3.”

Ultimately, Multiplan ended up being only mildly successful — while it sold well, it was dominated in the market by Lotus 1-2-3. Microsoft shifted efforts and focused on developing the new “Excel” software only for Windows and Macintosh.

By the end of the 1980’s, Microsoft scrapped the “Revenue Bomb” strategy entirely… opting to focus the bulk of their office software efforts on the IBM PC Compatible market (primarily MS-DOS and Windows) and the Macintosh market.

Still...

It is amazing to look back at Microsoft’s approach in the early 1980s: of bringing software to as many platforms as they could possibly muster.

There’s something awesome about that.

What would the modern computer industry look like had “The Revenue Bomb” approach been more successful? Would there be more viable computing platforms?

Hard to say. But, it sure is fun to dream about…

 
community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
2
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
AI + Rust = More Backdoors

Have a goal of inserting undetected backdoors (and other exploits) into popular software? Rust & Al code generation are here to help.

50% Off Yearly, & Massively Discounted Lifetime Subs Through May 31:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/50-off-yearly-and-massively-discounted

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:16:05
Open Source Projects Banning AI, From QEMU to NetBSD

While the Linux Kernel is becoming "Vibe Coded", other Open Source projects are outright banning all Al / LLM contributions. Including Haiku, OBS, Zig, & more.

50% Off Yearly, & Massively Discounted Lifetime Subs Through May 31:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/50-off-yearly-and-massively-discounted

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:12:29
Omarchy Linux 4 Mostly Written by AI

"Being into open source and recoiling from vibe coding is a contradiction in terms," says the Ruby on Rails & Omarchy Linux creator.

50% Off Yearly, & Massively Discounted Lifetime Subs Through May 31:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/50-off-yearly-and-massively-discounted

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:17:55
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044
10 hours ago

Microsoft is limiting AI usage by engineers. The token cost surpassed the cost of the engineers. Why hire experienced workers if they aren't going to use their well honed skills?

Microsoft discovered boyh through cost and Windows 11 disasters that AI is currently a tool. It is not a replacement for engineers or architects. Maybe in 8 to 10 years, buy not today.

To illustrate this, the article offers this anecdote from Uber.

Uber’s experience illustrates exactly how quickly that can happen. The company deployed Claude Code to 5,000 engineers and watched monthly usage rates climb to 84-95% by April 2026. Per-engineer API costs reached between $500 and $2,000 per month. The result: Uber burned through its entire $3.4 billion 2026 AI budget in four months. Its CTO said the annual budget had already been exhausted before the year was half over, AI Magazine confirmed.

https://www.thestreet.com/technology/microsoft-ceo-sends-shocking-message-to-employees

2 hours ago

I never know Bananas had language!

For a long time, I have held the opinion:
If You Cannot Define a Problem - then Any Effective Solution Is Very Unlikely.
👨‍🔧
@leebase @Lunduke
I hoped for "Internet Searches" to give me some useful results, but most of what I saw was "Weak Sauce." Lately there have been observations of "Spent a $$$ Ton on A.I. Tokens but All I Got Was Mush."
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/7969331/microsoft-is-limiting-ai-usage-by-engineers-the-token-cost-surpassed-the-cost-of-the-engineers-why#comments

see "4. Why..." for the explanation on Disappointing A.I.
Therefore ... here's Grok: starting with - The quote you mentioned is often attributed to Albert Einstein (though the exact wording varies). It perfectly captures a fundamental truth in problem-solving, especially in technical fields.

1. "Defining the Problem" in Tech Support and DevOps

In both Tech Support and DevOps, problem definition is the highest-leverage activity.

Good Problem Definition includes:

  • What exactly is happening? (Symptoms, not assumptions)
  • **When and ...
The "Windows 1.0" Lunduke Lifetime Wall is here!

Two awesome tidbits:

  1. The 7th Lifetime Subscriber Wall (aka “The Solaris Wall”) is full! No room for any more names! You can see the final version on the bottom of Lunduke.com (and at the end of new shows).

  2. The 8th Lifetime Wall will make its debut on Monday! The retro computing platform chosen for Wall number 8 will be… Windows 1.0!

If you would like to see your name immortalized in a screenshot of the very first version of Windows, from 1985, displayed on both Lunduke.com & at the end of all Lunduke Journal shows (you know you do):

Support the Lunduke Journal… and, at the same time, have your name immortalized in a screenshot of the operating system with (arguably) the worst color scheme in human history.

It’s a win-win.

 

-Lunduke

Read full Article
post photo preview
Lifetime "Solaris" Wall almost full!

Just a quick heads up that the 7th “Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscriber Wall”, aka “The Solaris Wall”, is almost full!

The Solaris Wall has enough space for maybe 6 or 7 more names (depending on name length)… before we lock it down and move on to Wall Number 8 (which will be another retro computing platform).

Hard to say how long until the Solaris Wall is full… but no more than a few days. These things fill up fast.

First come, first served.

Huge thank you to every subscriber. The Lunduke Journal wouldn’t be possible without you. You rule.

-Lunduke

 
Read full Article
Last call for the "Amiga" Lifetime Subscriber Wall. It's almost full!

Holy smokes, that was fast.

The 6th Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscriber Wall (aka the “Amiga OS 3.1” Wall) was introduced… what… a week ago?

I kid you not, the darn thing is already almost full! I was wildly unprepared for how popular this would be!

There’s enough space left for maybe 5 or 6 more names. Tops. Then I’ve gotta declare “Wall 6 (Amiga) is Full” and start Wall Number 7!

Here’s what all of the Lifetime Subscriber Walls look like (each shown at the end of every Lunduke Journal video):

 

If you want to get onto the Lifetime Subscriber Wall (and have any chance of making it onto the Amiga Wall before it’s full) here’s what you need to do (and do it quickly):

  1. Grab a Lifetime Subscription to The Lunduke Journal (if you don’t already have one).

    1. A Lifetime Sub includes all the standard perks (plus a few) and can be picked up via Locals, Substack, or Bitcoin (whichever you prefer).

  2. Email “bryan at lunduke.com” and let me know how you would like your name displayed (“Joe A.”, “Joseph Arnold”, “JoeyPants”, “SirJJMcManly”, etc.)

It’s first come, first served.

If you’ve already emailed me about being added to the wall, your spot is secured.

For the rest of you: Chop chop. At the current rate, I would be very surprised if the “Amiga Wall” wasn’t full by some time this weekend.

“Lifetime Wall 7” will be unveiled after the final name is added to the Amiga Wall. And, yes, it will be a different (awesome) retro computing platform.

As always, a huge thank you to every subscriber to The Lunduke Journal. Absolutely none of this would be possible without your support.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals