Lunduke
News • Science & Tech
The History of the First Computer Shell
BASH? PowerShell? It all traces back to 1963. And the work of an amazing Frenchman, CTTS, and Multics.
October 07, 2022
post photo preview

Powerful, “Command Line” computer interfaces have been around for — what seems like — forever. Interfaces where you can run multiple commands, one after another (in a batch)… where you can have simple “scripts” to tie those commands together.

That sort of “Shell” comes in so many forms… from SH and BASH on UNIX-like (and Linux) systems… to COMMAND.COM and PowerShell on Windows.

The text “Shell” is everywhere. And has been for longer than most can even remember.

But it had to start somewhere. Someone had to make the first “Shell”.

This is that story.

And that story starts… with a man. His name is Louis Pouzin.

The Man

Louis Pouzin was born, in 1931, in a small town in almost the smack-dab-middle of France: Chantenay-Saint-Imbert.

Louis Pouzin. With a sweet mustache. Photo credit: Jérémie Bernard

In the 1960’s Pouzin would move from France — and his job managing programmers at Bull (a French computer company) — to Massachusetts. His new job would put him working on an ambitious computing project at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology…

The Compatible Time-Sharing System

In 1961, the world’s first, general purpose, time sharing operating system was demonstrated at MIT.

That system — the “Compatible Time-Sharing System”… or “CTTS” — was originally developed on an IBM 709. And oh, what a beautiful machine it was.

The IBM 709

The IBM 709 was an absolute beast. Capable of adding 42,000 numbers per second, and multiplying two 36-bit integers together at a (then) blinding speed: 5,000 per second.

All contained in a svelte 2,000 pounds.

And this IBM 709, running CTTS, certainly had a text interface… but it wasn’t exactly a “Shell”. At least not in any way we would recognize together. Certainly, no scripting together of commands.

Over the next two years, CTTS continued to improve and evolve. Getting ported, by 1963, to a modified IBM 7094. Which, like the 709 before it, was a gorgeous machine. With enough physical switches to make any Sci-Fi nerd happy.

The IBM 7094 - “The Blue Machine”. Photo credit: IBM

It is around this time, that Pouzin arrives at MIT, where he is (at least partially) responsible for a little program called “MAIL”.

Wait. What? Pouzin invented E-Mail?

 

Well. Not quite. This was several years before what we now call “E-Mail” was created. This original “MAIL”, on CTTS, was a system for sending mail messages to other users… on the same CTTS system. It lacked a mechanism for forwarding messages to users on other systems.

 

Just the same, this work heavily influenced what would later become “E-Mail”.

But we’re not here to talk about MAIL or the many contributions Pouzin made to computer networking (leading to what we call “The Internet”) — that’s a fascinating topic for another day. Let’s focus on a little program that Pouzin wrote… which would change computing forever.

RUNCOM

You see, in those days, there was no “command interpreter” program. No “shell”. You simply instructed the kernel to run a single program.

Nothing like “COMMAND.COM” on DOS. Or BASH, SH, or other shells on UNIX and Linux systems. Nothing at a all like that existed.

That all changed in 1963, when Pouzin came up with “RUNCOM” — short for “RUN COMmand”.

In Pouzin’s words:

“After having written dozens of commands for CTSS, I reached the stage where I felt that commands should be usable as building blocks for writing more commands, just like subroutine libraries. Hence, I wrote "RUNCOM", a sort of shell driving the execution of command scripts, with argument substitution. The tool became instantly most popular, as it became possible to go home in the evening while leaving behind long runcoms executing overnight. It was quite neat for boring and repetitive tasks such as renaming, moving, updating, compiling, etc. whole directories of files for system and application maintenance and monitoring.”

RUNCOM was, truly, the first “Shell” system.

In fact, Pouzin, was the first person to call such a program a “Shell”.

His RUNCOM program would continue to be a critical component of the CTTS system until it ceased operations in 1973.

RUNCOM section from the CTTS Programmers Guide. Courtesy: Internet Archive

But we still didn’t quite have what we would call a “Shell”. Not yet.

The “Shell” had a name, and some of the features, but it wasn’t a truly interactive experience.

Meanwhile, in England…

During 1964, a computer scientist named Christopher Strachey was working at the University of Cambridge… on, what he called, the “General Purpose Macrogenerator”. Or “GPM”, for short.

Christopher Strachey, sporting a most excellent mustache. Photo courtesy: University of Oxford

This language had a heavy influence on much of 1960s and 1970s computing — including on “m4”.

M4 is a macro language, developed by Brian Kernighan and Dennis Ritchie, that was part of the original version of UNIX… and was later adopted as a part of the POSIX standard.

Strachey’s GPM design document. Published in a 1965 issue of The Computer Journal.

Back in Massachusetts…

During 1964, work on Multics (the “Multiplexed Information and Computing Service”) was getting underway at MIT (as a joint project between MIT, General Electric, and Bell Labs).

While Pouzin wasn’t going to be part of the Multics project… boy howdy… he had some ideas.

In his own words:

“Then in 64 came the Multics design time, in which I was not much involved, because I had made it clear I wanted to return to France in mid 65. However, this idea of using commands somehow like a programming language was still in the back of my mind. Christopher Strachey, a British scientist, had visited MIT about that time, and his macro-generator design appeared to me a very solid base for a command language, in particular the techniques for quoting and passing arguments. Without being invited on the subject, I wrote a paper explaining how the Multics command language could be designed with this objective. And I coined the word "shell" to name it. It must have been at the end of 64 or beginning of 65.”

Pouzin made sure his ideas were documented, by publishing a document entitled: “The SHELL: A global tool for calling and chaining procedures in the system”.

The full document is archived by MIT.
 

According to Pouzin:

“The small gang of Multics wizards found it a sleek idea, but they wanted something more refined in terms of language syntax. As time left to me was short, and I was not an expert in language design, I let the issue for them to debate, and instead I made a program flowchart of the shell. It was used after I left for writing the first Multics shell. Glenda Schroeder (MIT) and a GE man did it.”

From Tom Van Vleck, who worked on Multics for 16 years (starting in 1965):

“The first time I remember the name "shell" for the function of finding and running a command was in a Multics Design Notebook document by Louis Pouzin.

 

These memos con[t]ained the idea of having the command processing shell be an unprivileged user program that parsed a command line, located a program to run, and executed it with arguments.”

So. Who created the first “Shell”?

The concept, and first implementation of a “Shell” (RUNCOM for the CTTS), was made by Louis Pouzin.

But the first truly interactive example of a Shell — the one that was part of Multics, and which would most closely resemble the interactive shells of today — was initially designed by Pouzin… and programmed by Glenda Schroeder and a “Mystery Man from General Electric”.

The impact of RUNCOM and the Multics Shell

The impact of these early Shells cannot be understated.

Because of RUNCOM — and the designs of Pouzin — we have the Multics Shell.

Because of Multics… we have UNIX (originally named UNICS… before someone in marketing decided an “X” looked cooler) and SH.

You can trace every single computer Shell in existence — including BASH, PowerShell, and so many others — back to that first work. Back to the ideas of Louis Pouzin.

In fact, that influence expands far beyond just the design ideas of a scriptable, interactive Shell.

According to Brian Kernighan and Dennis Ritchie:

"There was a facility that would execute a bunch of commands stored in a file; it was called RUNCOM for "run commands", and the file began to be called "a runcom". rc in Unix is a fossil from that usage."

That’s right. Have you seen “rc” on your UNIX or Posix systems — such as .cshrc or /etc/rc? Those are named that way, according the the men behind UNIX itself, because of RUNCOM and Louis Pouzin.

To put it simply, modern computing is the way it is, in large part… thanks to Pouzin. A computer scientist that should be a household name.

community logo
Join the Lunduke Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
9
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Proton Mail Apologizes for Sponsoring "Far Right French YouTuber"

Activists on Reddit attacked Proton Mail for advertising with a YouTuber accused of "far-right positioning". Proton quickly caved to the mob and apologized.

Grab a discounted Lifetime Sub & get on the Wall:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/50-off-yearly-and-massively-discounted

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:20:14
Ex Board Member Reveals Corruption & Dysfunction at GNOME Foundation

Unpaid invoices. Threats. Secret bannings of Elected Board Members.
Non-Disparagement Agreements. "Hiding crucial information about staff".

Grab a Discounted Lifetime Subscription & Get on The Wall:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/50-off-yearly-and-massively-discounted

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:26:38
AI Generated Patches to Linux Kernel Hits New Record High

8% of all code submissions to the Linux Kernel are now Al generated.

Grab a discounted Lifetime Sub & get on the Wall:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/behold-the-win-2k-and-mac-system

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

00:14:24
November 22, 2023
The futility of Ad-Blockers

Ads are filling the entirety of the Web -- websites, podcasts, YouTube videos, etc. -- at an increasing rate. Prices for those ad placements are plummeting. Consumers are desperate to use ad-blockers to make the web palatable. Google (and others) are desperate to break and block ad-blockers. All of which results in... more ads and lower pay for creators.

It's a fascinatingly annoying cycle. And there's only one viable way out of it.

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links? Check here:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

The futility of Ad-Blockers
November 21, 2023
openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"

Those in power with openSUSE make it clear they will not allow me anywhere near anything related to the openSUSE project. Ever. For any reason.

Well, that settles that, then! Guess I won't be contributing to openSUSE! 🤣

Looking for the Podcast RSS feed or other links?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4619051/lunduke-journal-link-central-tm

Give the gift of The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4898317/give-the-gift-of-the-lunduke-journal

openSUSE says "No Lunduke allowed!"
September 13, 2023
"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

This episode is free for all to enjoy and share.

Be sure to subscribe here at Lunduke.Locals.com to get all shows & articles (including interviews with other amazing nerds).

"Andreas Kling creator of Serenity OS & Ladybird Web Browser" - Lunduke’s Big Tech Show - September 13th, 2023 - Ep 044

RE: Claude Code - "once things reach a certain level of complexity, things seems to fall off the rails."
@JRico @leebase

https://lunduke.locals.com/post/7993219/i-keep-running-hot-and-cold-with-claude-and-claude-code-i-don-t-know-if-my-prompting-skills-are#comments
(I'm not "DevOps" but...) I remember Apple had "Human Interface Guidelines" - and now I've heard about "Self-Similar Patterns" and Fractal Analysis.
My "Theory" is: Do NOT Make Your Code "Anti-Modular" (where layout/design is "inconsistent", each "sub-section" feels like it came from unrelated projects).

Here's Grok giving its "take" on my question (prompt at bottom):

📑
Yes, you're touching on a very insightful point (self-similar, modular code). AI-assisted coding (especially with LLMs) often struggles with increased complexity because it excels at generating individual pieces quickly but tends to produce inconsistent, bloated, or "vibe-coded" solutions when scaling up.

Fractal / Self-Similar Design Principles in Software

Yes, ...

16 hours ago

I keep running hot and cold with Claude and Claude code. I don’t know if my prompting skills are just bad. It is really good at getting the framework of an application started, but once things reach a certain level of complexity, things seems to fall off the rails. AI keeps wanting to make complex code even more complex - even when easier/more straightforward approaches exist. /rewind is my best friend at the moment.

Ultimately, it seems like the more complicated things become, the more you need to understand the code and give AI increasingly detailed and specific instructions. I’m betting at some point in the complexity curve it will be faster to code it myself than to write the prompt.

Although I can’t complain too much, I vibe coded most of the basic features of an app in a weekend that probably would have taken me weeks by hand. Solid first draft.

21 hours ago

Ride or Die with My 2019 Intel MacBook Pro

The only time I’ve ever spent “big money” on a “desktop replacement” laptop was my 2019 Intel i9 16” MacBook Pro. What a glorious machine. I kitted her out with 64gig ram and 2tb nvme and the fasted gpu available. It was my every OS machine. I could fire up VM’s for Windows and Linux and run all at the same time with no lag at all. As my luck would have it, the new Apple Silicon Macs were announced a few months after my purchase. I feared my beloved MacBook would become obsolete before its time.

Yesterday Apple announced the MacOS 27 would not support Intel Macs. If history is anything to go by, I have 2 years after that to continue to get security updates. After that, my Mac laptop will become a Linux machine.

Even hardware support comes to an end next month as 7+ years after Apple stops selling something it becomes obsolete.

It would be more of a tragedy if it weren’t for that same M1 Air that set the clock on my machine. I ...

post photo preview
TempleOS arrives on The Lunduke Journal Lifetime Wall

“When are you going to add a TempleOS Lifetime Wall??!”

I’ve lost track of the number of times I’ve received that request over the last few weeks. Well. What the heck! Why not?

There are now three Lunduke Journal Lifetime Subscriber Walls (displayed both on Lunduke.com and the end of all new shows) with space available:

  • Macintosh System 1

  • Windows 2000

  • TempleOS

 

A few quick notes:

  1. The Windows 2000 Wall, which was introduced only 2 days ago, is already about half way full. At the current rate, that one will likely be full by the end of the week. Still plenty of space on the Mac System 1 Wall.

  2. The discount on Lifetime Subscriptions ($125… discounted from the normal $300) runs through the end of June.

  3. One Lifetime Subscription = Name Listed on One Wall. These Walls are crazy popular and fill up super fast, so I have to put that limit in place.

  4. Want your name on more than one Lifetime Wall? Grab a second Lifetime Subscription (use the discounted rate) and you can have your name added to one of the Walls with space still available.

Massive high five to everyone who has supported The Lunduke Journal and made these retro-computer Lifetime Walls so much fun to do!

-Lunduke

Read full Article
post photo preview
Behold! The "Win 2K" & "Mac System 1" Lifetime Sub Walls!

Woah! The 8th Lifetime Subscriber Wall of The Lunduke Journal (aka “The Windows 1.0 Wall”) is already full! After only one week! That’s nuts!

So I’m opening up two new, retro computer walls!

  • Wall 9 - “The Macintosh System 1 Wall”

  • Wall 10 - “The Windows 2000 Wall”

 

Show your support for The Lunduke Journal, and be immortalized in a retro computer screenshot. Win-win!

If the past is any indicator, these will fill up crazy fast. First come, first served.

Plus: For the entire month of June, Lifetime Subscriptions are discounted down to $125 (regularly $300).

  1. Scroll down and grab a new Lifetime Subscription (at that bonkers discount).

  2. Choose which of the two new Walls you’d like to be on (Mac System 1 or Windows 2000). Totally optional.

How to Grab a Discounted Lifetime Subscription:

There are 3 different ways to pick up a Lunduke Journal Lifetime sub. All of them work great and include the same perks. Choose whichever works best for you!

Get a Lifetime Subscription via Locals:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Locals.com/support.

  2. Select “Give Once“.

  3. Enter “125“ into the amount field.

  4. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

Get a Lifetime Subscription via Substack:

  1. Go to Lunduke.Substack.com/subscribe.

  2. Select the “Lifetime Subscription” option.

  3. After checking out, Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status. (This usually happens within a few hours.)

If you would also like full, Lifetime access to Lunduke.Locals.com (which is included):

  1. Make a free account on Lunduke.Locals.com.

  2. Email “bryan at lunduke.com” with the email address you use on both Substack and Locals (can be different email addresses).

  3. Lunduke will toss you an email once your account is set to full lifetime status on Locals.

Get a Lifetime Subscription with Bitcoin:

Bonus: Save an extra $10 with the Bitcoin option, as Bitcoin processing has fewer fees associated with it.

bc1qyjakve8fywm8pz2v99v57yhjj0vzr2vjze6fcq

  • Email “bryan at lunduke.com” with the following information: What time you made the transaction, how much was sent (in Bitcoin), and the email address you use (or plan to use) on Locals.com or Substack.com.

-Lunduke

Read full Article
Windows 1.0 Wall almost full! Last call!

Holy Guacamole, Batman!

The 8th Lifetime Subscriber Wall (“The Windows 1.0 Wall”) of The Lunduke Journal launched exactly one week ago… and it’s already almost full! Bonkers!

 

At the current rate, the “Windows 1.0 Wall” will be full sometime tomorrow (Saturday).

Want your name immortalized in that glorious 1985 styled goodness, proclaiming to the world your support of The Lunduke Journal?

Don’t have a Lifetime Subscription?

  1. Grab one for $125 (normally $300).

  2. You’ll get a confirmation email (within just a few hours). Reply to that email with how you would like your name displayed on a Lifetime Wall.

  3. Then enjoy the other perks of being Lunduke Journal subscriber. Forum access, MP4 downloads, and PDF eBooks.

Already have a Lifetime Subscription?

  1. Just toss an email to bryan [at] lunduke.com with how you would like your name displayed on a Lifetime Wall.

Easy peasy.

First come, first served. Once the “Windows 1.0 Wall” is full, the final version will be added to Lunduke.com and the 9th Lifetime Wall will debut!

-Lunduke

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals